DRAMATIC ARTS
NATIONAL SENIOR CERTIFICATE
GRADE 12
MEMORANDUM
SEPTEMBER 2018
GENERAL COMMENT FOR EXAMINERS/EDUCATORS:
SECTION A: 20TH CENTURY THEATRE MOVEMENTS
QUESTION 1: 20TH CENTURY THEATRE MOVEMENTS (-ISM)
Topic | 12.1: 20th Century ‘isms 12.3: Absurd or Epic or Postmodern Theatre 12.4: Play Text 1: 20th Century Theatre Movements, Epic or Absurd or Post-Modern theatre | ||||||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Analyse, Evaluate, Create | ||||||||
Command verb | Discuss, Evaluate, Create | ||||||||
Explanation of command verb | To determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding. | ||||||||
Complexity of thinking process | Metacognitive | ||||||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Very difficult | ||||||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response | ||||||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 9 | Middle | 12 | High | 9 |
Quality Level | MARK Allocation | QUALITY OF EVIDENCE |
High End | Score point | The response indicates application of a reasonable strategy that leads to a correct solution in the context of the problem. The procedural representations are correct. The explanation and/or justification is logically sound, clearly presented, fully developed, supports the solution, and does not contain significant conceptual errors. The response demonstrates a complete understanding and analysis of the problem. |
24–30 | ||
Average and Above Average | Score point | The response indicates application of a reasonable strategy that may or may not lead to a correct solution. The use of content/skill is essential correct. The explanation and/or justification is generally well developed, feasible, and supports solution. The response demonstrates a clear understanding and analysis of the problem. |
15–23 | ||
Achieved | Score point | The response indicates an incomplete application of a reasonable strategy that may or may not lead to a fit-for-purpose solution. The use of content/skill is fundamentally correct. The explanation and/or justification support the solution and are plausible, although it may not be well developed or complete. The response demonstrates a conceptual understanding and analysis of the problem. |
11–14 | ||
Weak | Score point | The response indicates little or no application of a reasonable strategy. It may or may not have the correct answer. The use of content/skill is incomplete or missing. The explanation and/or justification may be incomplete or missing. The response demonstrates a minimal understanding and analysis of the problem. |
1 – 10 | ||
Not Achieved | Score point | The response is completely incorrect or irrelevant. There may be no response, or the response may state, ‘I don’t know’ |
0 |
The following content pointers serve as guide:
The candidate must:
The content of the essay must cover the following:
Markers’ note:
DESCRIPTOR | MARKS | THE CANDIDATE DEMONSTRATES THE FOLLOWING: |
Outstanding Metacognitive Knowledge Create | 27−30 90−100 A+ |
|
Excellent Metacognitive Knowledge Evaluate | 24−26 80−89 A |
|
Meritorious Procedural Knowledge Analyse | 21−23 70−79 B |
|
Substantial Procedural Knowledge Apply | 18−20 60−69 C |
|
Adequate Conceptual Knowledge Understand | 15–17 50–59 D |
|
Moderate Conceptual Knowledge Understand | 12–14 40–49 E |
|
Elementary Factual Knowledge Remember | 10–11 30–39 F |
|
Not Achieved Factual Knowledge Remember | 1–10 20–29 G |
|
Not Achieved Factual Knowledge Remember | 0 H |
|
IMPORTANT NOTES WHEN MARKING THE ESSAY:
In addition to referring to all knowledge and skills outlined in the rubric per descriptor, please take note of the following:
One factual statement about the theatre style or the play does not equal one mark. Carefully consider the thinking process and cognitive level involved in the overall discussion by the candidate. An essay filled with factual statements about the play and theatre style at best falls into the Elementary descriptor category (30%–39%).
Essays assessed as being in the Excellent and Outstanding Descriptor category (80% and above) must include all knowledge and skills outlined in the rubric and must include a discussion/comparison of the socio-political contexts of the modern and 20th century worlds. The socio-political context is implied in the question for higher order cognitive level answers.
The following content that candidates should refer to is taken from the Via Afrika Grade 12 Learners Textbook and other sources. This may be used as an aid to assessment of the content of the essay and as further study resource material.
ABSURD THEATRE
Socio-Political context
Philosophies/20th century –isms
Influential thinkers/philosophers of the time:
Existentialism
The main concern of this philosophy is the meaning of existence, which is seen as illogical, pointless, arbitrary and cruel. We exist because we exist – there is no pre-ordained plan and after life we become dust – there is no proof of after-life existence. This makes living in the moment very important because the present is the only reality we can count on.
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900) first claimed that ‘God is dead’. He meant that people’s relationship with God was broken, and that God was as good as dead.
Jean-Paul Sartre said that ‘Man is condemned to be free’: condemned also because we did not create ourselves. Having been hurled into the world, we are responsible for everything that we do. As such people feel alien in a world that has no meaning, and this feeling of alienation creates despair, boredom and a sense of absurdity. He did not believe in a system of absolute morals we have to adhere to. We were created as free individuals and this freedom condemns us to make choices throughout our lives. Facts and events in live only have meaning because we have attached such meaning to them. An action is therefore only immoral because we chose to label it as such. Our choices are significant. We must find our own values and act in accordance with them – and then accept the consequences. In existentialist philosophy, this is called ‘authenticity’.
Albert Camus was the first theorist to use the term ‘Absurd’ in relation to the human existence. By this we mean that human beings are ridiculous creatures, out of harmony with their surroundings. The term expresses the gulf between our aspirations and the meaningless universe in which we exist. Our problem is to find our own way and our own standards in a world of chaos. He reinforces the idea of solipsism – a belief that one can only know oneself. Camus believed that human beings lost the comfort to explain the world in terms of logic and reason after WW2. The modern world makes no sense. People are also isolated and cut-off from each other through difficulties in communication.
Camus’ ideas are summed up in an essay, The Myth of Sisyphus (1942), in which he describes the plight of human beings through the Greek myth about Sisyphus, who angered the gods and was condemned to push a boulder up a hill, only to have it roll back down as soon as he reached the top. He saw this act of seemingly pointless repetition similar to existence for post-war society.
Absurdist characters
Other Absurd Theatre conventions
Plot structure
The plots of Absurd Theatre do not follow traditional structural forms. There is no unity of action, time and place as in the mirrored society of traditional theatre. Action, time and place is dislocated to reflect a world out of harmony. Playwrights employ a circular, episodic structure emphasising the lack of progress to a logical resolution. All events have equal insignificance and the only resolution is the inevitable moment of death. The structure gives the audience an experience of living a senseless live in a meaningless world through either following a circular pattern or spiral descending into futility. There is little exposition and nothing seems to happen. The climax is postponed. Characters fill the time with trivial activities such as circus clowning, music-hall banter, repetitive dialogue, farce and futile attempts at understanding their universe.
Language/Dialogue
Performance space
Stage used to reflect the emptiness of the existentialist world where people feel isolated in their environment.
The stage becomes a metaphor for the world itself.
The performance space focuses attention on themes and symbolic meaning rather than the external realities of life.
Beckett’s empty performance spaces reflect the oppressive emptiness of the lives of the characters.
Ionesco clutters the performance space yet achieves the same effect of oppressive emptiness (of spirit). A cluttered environment that is still empty of meaning.
EPIC THEATRE
Socio-political context
Brecht
Philosophies/20th century –isms
Influential thinkers/philosophers of the time:
Marxism was based on Hegelian dialectics, which can be described as ‘the coexistence of opposites, the merging of thesis and antithesis, the fact that order cannot be conceived without disorder – in a word, dynamic ambiguity’. This became for Brecht the essence of drama, as it showed that human life was never static, but always developing.
All causes, effects and relationships are dynamic, involving ongoing conflict and contradictions. Conflicting forces pull a person, family or society in opposite directions, which, in turn, bring about movement, development or change.
In the early 20th century, the artistic world was involved in a rebellion against the romantic and naturalistic styles, and movements, such as Dadaism, cubism, surrealism and expressionism, were opposed to naturalism and realism.
Expressionism was first applied to respectively the Dutch and French painters Van Gogh and Gauguin who worked in a style different from the Impressionist painters. It focused on the artist’s emotions rather than on the objects that aroused these emotions.
In drama, it refers to the movement that first grew in Germany around the time of First World War. It captured feelings of dissatisfaction with authority and the materialism associated with the war. Expressionism used sarcasm and satire to attack increasing industrialisation and materialism.
The expressionists believed that there is no absolute truth but that fundamental truth is to be found within humankind – its spirit, desires and visions – and external reality should be reshaped until it is brought into harmony with these internal attributes. They believed that beneath the social façade there is a vast hidden reality consisting of secrets and unconscious desires, aspirations, conflicts, frustrations and hallucinations. It is this subjective reality that Expressionists wished to explore.
The aim of Expressionistic writers was to expose the inner feelings and experiences of the characters, rather than the outer reality in which they existed. The focus was on the journey of the soul of the main character, so normal order of events and the unities of time, place and action were disrupted to create a heightened effect.
Epic characters
Other Epic Theatre Conventions
Plot Structure
The epic play was structured as a montage of independent incidents (episodes which are complete within themselves), which Brecht believed could connect dissimilar in such a way as to ‘shock’ people into new recognitions and understandings. In Kanna Hy Kô Hystoe the structure forms a montage through the unstructured connecting of important moments, happenings and conversations in the life of the family. As the text indicates ‘the characters speak across distances, years, dreams and death’.
In an episodic structure the episodes are linked by thematic threads, which Brecht wanted his audience to confront, ponder, debate and reflect upon. The audience could make connections between the past and present.
Brecht’s plays were structured according to Marxist dialectics: argument, clash and confrontation. The thesis-antithesis structure of an argument can be found in the structure and placement of the scenes. Brecht referred to the ‘gest’ of each scene – its well-defined action and purpose.
The chain of events exists to present a solid case from which a socio-political lesson can be learned. Brecht maintained that his plays were like scientific experiments that examined human behaviour to see what morals and principles influence them, and whether there is scope for improvement.
Historification
Historification (or setting the play in a distant past or distant location away from the audience’s reality) contributes significantly to keeping the audience critical of what they are watching, while allowing them to draw parallels with the present. He wanted the audience to experience an objective distance, so they could participate in alternative decision-making. Historification refers not only to the historical setting of the action, but also to the geographical setting.
Verfremdungseffect
Verfremdung (sometimes translated as ‘alienation’ or ‘distancing’, but literally meaning ‘to make strange’) is an important Brechtian term. The verfremdungseffekt (or V-effect) refers to the way Brecht went about ensuring that his audience’s empathy was broken, so that they remained critical of the events they were watching.
POST-MODERN THEATRE
Socio-Political context
Philosophies/20th century –isms
Influential thinkers/philosophers of the time
The term ‘postmodern’ came into the philosophical lexicon with the publication of Jean-Francois Lyotard’s La Condition Postmodern in 1979 (The Postmodern Condition: A report on knowledge, 1984).
One of the themes in postmodern philosophy is a denial of universal, objective truth. This is clearly declared in Jean-Francois Lyotard’s statement ‘incredulity towards metanarrative’. A metanarrative refers to a unifying story that seeks to explain how the world is – in other words a metanarrative is a worldview. Lyotard suggests that we should be sceptical of such broad explanations. For example, the statement ‘God so loved the world’ is nonsensical to Postmodernists for two reasons: (1) they deny the existence of God, and (2) statements reflecting the whole world (metanarratives) are impossible.
The computer age has transformed knowledge into information, that is, coded messages within a system of transmission and communication. We live in a world where we are bombarded with messages and information and shy away from accepting only one absolute truth about the world we live in.
Postmodernism is a repetition of the modern as the ‘new,’ and this means the ever-new demand for another repetition. Sam Shepard’s plays are peopled with characters from the mythic landscape of America: heroes, rock-stars and cowboys. He combines storytelling with experimental forms. His plays seem to border on realism but it really is a container for stories that explore the post-modern condition in America.
His theatrical style is marked by monologues with a hallucinatory quality, dialogue that seems bizarre and sometimes nightmarish. The language is meant to transport the audience into moments of heightened consciousness. Another notable aspect of his work is pastiche: he juxtaposes pop culture images and characters on stage.
Post-modern characters
Post-Modern conventions
Pastiche: The taking of various ideas from previous writings and literary styles and pasting them together to make new styles.
Intertextuality: The acknowledgement of previous literary works within another literary work.
Metafiction: The act of writing about writing or making readers aware of the fictional nature of the very fiction they are reading. In theatre, this becomes Meta-theatre, making the audience aware of the fact that it is only a play.
Temporal Distortion: The use of non-linear timelines and narrative techniques in a story.
Minimalism: The use of characters and events which are decidedly common and non-exceptional characters.
Maximalism: Disorganised, lengthy, highly detailed writing.
Magical Realism: The introduction of impossible or unrealistic events into a narrative that is otherwise realistic.
Faction: The mixing of actual historical events with fictional events without clearly defining what is factual and what is fictional.
Reader Involvement / Audience Involvement: Often through direct address to the reader/audience and the open acknowledgement of the fictional/unreal nature of the events being described.
TOTAL SECTION A: 30
SECTION B: SOUTH AFRICAN THEATRE (1960–1994)
QUESTION 2: WOZA ALBERT! BY BARNEY SIMONS, PERCY MTWA AND MBONGENI NGEMA
2.1
2.1.1
Topic | 10.11: SA Theatre, Workshop Theatre 12.5: SA Theatre (1960-1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Name | |||||
Explanation of command verb | To identify, specify or mention by name | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Short Specific Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 0 | Middle | 1 | High | 1 |
Workshop method. (1)
2.1.2
Topic | 10.11: SA Theatre, Workshop Theatre 10.8: Text Interpretation | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Analyse | |||||
Command verb | Discuss | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Write about the topic in detail, take into account or consider different issues or ideas or opinions related to it. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Procedural | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Short Extended Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 3 |
Markers to mark with discretion. The following is a guideline:
With regards to Workshop theatre making method, ‘Interpretive freedom’ refers to the following.
One mark for a simple response and THREE marks for a well-motivated answer.
2.1.3
Topic | 10.1: Introduction to Drama 10.Staging Conventions 11.11: Poor Theatre 12.3: Epic Theatre 12.5: SA Theatre (1960-1994), Playtext Woza Albert! | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Analyse | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Make Something clear, easy to understand by describing more in detail or revealing facts or information. Give a reason so as to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Analyse | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-2 | Middle | 3-4 | High | 5-6 |
Consider the following as guidelines (Refer to ANNEXURE A).
Award marks for FOUR different aspects discussed individually or TWO well explained aspects.
The traditional plot for plays usually looks like this:
Sometimes the playwright leaves us to think about the theme or future possibilities for the characters.
Candidate may oppose the plot by discussing the structure as Episodic. An episodic structure is characterised by the following:
Candidate may argue against traditional using the above information.
COSTUME:
In Woza Albert!
2.2
Topic | 10.12: Staging Conventions 11.1: Realism and Stanislavski 11.10: Poor Theatre 12.5: SA Theatre (1960-1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Analyse | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Make Something clear, easy to understand by describing more in detail or revealing facts or information. Give a reason so as to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-2 | Middle | 3-4 | High | 5-6 |
Candidate agrees or disagrees with the given statement. However, in the beginning of the play Woza Albert! It is clearly stated that the actors, Mbongeni and Percy went under a strict actor training method i.e. Poor theatre techniques. Consider the following:
Award full marks for THREE well-motivated reasons.
In Woza Albert! the following are true to the acting:
2.3
Topic | 10.12: Staging Conventions 12.5: SA Theatre (1960-1994) Cognitive level difficulty | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Evaluate | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth, condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Meta cognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Very difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-2 | Middle | 3-4 | High | 5-6 |
Candidates’ own response. Markers must mark with discretion.
Award full marks for THREE well-motivated reasons with examples.
The following might be the reasons:
2.4
Topic | 11.10: Poor Theatre 12.5: SA Theatre (1960-1994) Woza Albert! | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Suggest | |||||
Command verb | Explain, Describe | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Make Something clear, easy to understand by describing more in detail or revealing facts or information. Give a reason so as to justify or excuse (an action or event) To give, narrate, relate, tell, describe, express a detailed account of | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Procedural | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-2 | Middle | 3-4 | High | 5-6 |
Award full marks for THREE well explained, with examples reasons given by candidates.
These are some of the motivations behind the meaning of the term Poor Theatre.
2.5
Topic | 10.12: Staging Conventions 12.5: SA Theatre (1960–1994) Woza Albert! | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Suggest | |||||
Command verb | Discuss | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Write about the topic in detail, taking into account or considering different issues or ideas or opinions related to it. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Metacognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Very difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 0-3 | Middle | 4-7 | High | 8-10 |
Refer to staging conventions of Poor Theatre. Consider the school environment in candidates’ responses.
Use the rubric in ANNEXURE B. (10)
[40]
OR
QUESTION 3: SOPHIATOWN BY JUNCTION AVENUE THEATRE COMPANY
3.1
3.1.1
Topic | 12.5: SA Theatre (1960–1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Name, Identify and Select | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Specify time or place as something desired. Prove what or who someone or something is. Carefully choose, determine or decide the best or most suitable. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-2 | Middle | 3-4 | High | 5-6 |
The character of Jakes introduces the audience to the socio-political background of the play in a monologue. The audience is then introduced to the characters of Mingus and the writing of the love letter introducing the theme of love as contrast to the conflict of the struggle. The exposition carries on in scene 2 as we are introduced to Mamriti’s shebeen and the characters of Lulu and Princess. The exposition comes to an end with the triggering event which is when Ruth enters. (4)
3.1.2
Topic | 10.12: Staging Conventions 12.5: SA Theatre (1960 – 1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Creating | |||||
Command verb | Create | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Evolve from one’s own thought or imagination, as a work of art, an invention or something new. Cause to come to being. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Metacognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-2 | Middle | 3-4 | High | 5-6 |
Award marks for knowledge of positioning on stage as well as the use of movement and lighting.
Following is an example of a possible response:
Shafts of light illuminates the cast spread over the stage on different levels with Jakes centre stage. Theu move around the stage as they dance to the opening song. Characters move to their designated positions at the end of the song to establish their characters: Lulu to school desk, Mamriti to arm chair, Mingus and Princess to the street lamp and Charlie at Mingus’ feet. Jakes to typewriter. Jake rises and moves down stage as he addresses the audience. Mingus joins him until scene two where all characters are illuminated in Mamariti’s house. (6)
3.2
Topic | 12.5: SA Theatre (1960 – 1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Applying | |||||
Command verb | Suggest | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Cause, argue, demonstrate, show that something exists or is the case. Put forward for consideration. Mention an idea, possible plan, or action for other people to consider. Produce an idea in mind | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Moderate to difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-3 | Middle | 4-6 | High | 7-8 |
Award TWO marks per well explained response or ONE mark per briefly stated fact.
Mamariti:
(A respectable shebeen queen with a motherly figure above her, the oldest in the house, the leader of a home)
Mingus:
(A gangstar kingpin, a thug, a fashion lover with an obvious inclination to brand names)
Candidate must provide reasons for their choice of costume.
Use rubric in ANNEXURE A (8)
3.3
Topic | 10.2: SA Theatre 11.4: SA Theatre 12.5: SA Theatre (1960 – 1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Evaluate | |||||
Explanation of command verb | To determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth, or condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-3 | Middle | 4-6 | High | 7-8 |
Consider the following from candidates’ responses.
Two marks for ONE well-motivated opinion.
Use rubric in ANNEXURE A
(8)
3.4
Topic | 12.2: Theme/Audition Programme 12.5: SA Theatre (1960 – 1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Creating | |||||
Command verb | Create | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Evolve from one’s own thought or imagination, as a work of art, an invention or something new. Cause to come to being. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Metacognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructive Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-2 | Middle | 3-4 | High | 5-6 |
Candidate may mention any physical or vocal quality or technique or any acting technique. Give credit for clear practical advice. The following is an example of a response:
Movements should be awkward and submissive.
Voice is not well-articulated and controlled – may use involuntary or sudden noises to emphasise emotions or reactions.
Fearful and respectful towards Mingus.
Actor will need to use imagination in order to portray a mentally challenged personality – limited focus and attention paid to actions and reactions or obsessive attention such as the attempted polishing of Ruth’s shoes. (4)
3.5
Topic | 10.2: SA Theatre 12’5: SA Theatre (1960–1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Discuss | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Write about the topic in detail, taking into account or considering different issues or ideas or opinions related to it. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Procedural | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-3 | Middle | 4-7 | High | 8-10 |
Mark holistically according to candidate’s own opinion. Give credit for candidates showing an understanding of the similarities and differences in the socio-political contexts of the play and the current state of affairs. Candidates must refer to the play to illustrate their points. The following could be discussed:
Overpopulation of residences in Sophiatown and modern South Africans still dealing with poverty in informal settlements as well as slums in the city. (Hill brow)
Gangsterism in Sophiatown and modern gangsterism (Cape Flats and other cities)
Standing together as a community for an important human rights cause is still important in today’s society.
Acceptance and tolerance of different cultures (Sophiatown culture and Jewish culture in the play).
Use ANNEXURE B to assess the candidate. (10)
[40]
OR
QUESTION 4: SIENER IN DIE SUBURBS BY P.G. DU PLESSIS
4.1
Topic | 12.5: SA Theatre (1960–1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Identify | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Recognise a problem, need, fact, etc. and to show what it is and that it exists. To prove who or what someone or something is. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2-3 | High | 4 |
Tjokkie is the protagonist of the drama as his experience and emotions are at the core of the plot. The title already suggests that the drama is about the Seer (Siener). His ability to ‘see’ places him in a specific relationship towards all the other characters. His ability to ‘see’ is mentioned in the exposition, causes the triggering event and drives the development of the drama leading to the climax and fatal ending. (4)
4.2
Topic | 12.5: SA Theatre (1960 – 1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Applying | |||||
Command verb | Suggest | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Cause, argue, demonstrate, show that something exists or is the case. Put forward for consideration. Mention an idea, possible plan, or action for other people to consider. Produce an idea in mind | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Moderate to difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-2 | Middle | 3-4 | High | 5-6 |
Mark globally according to candidate’s opinion. The following should be included in the candidate’s response:
4.3
Topic | 12.5: SA Theatre (1960-1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Name | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Specify time or place as something desired, suggested, or decided on. To identify, specify, or mention by name | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2-3 | High | 4 |
Award marks for the description of an appropriate scene (2 MARKS) and for the correct identifying of the theme expressed in the scene (2 MARKS).
As example:
Tiemie’s exchange with her mother about her being different than her mother, highlighting her desire to leave the suburbs and exposing the theme of escaping or overcoming one’s circumstances.
(4)
4.4
Topic | 12.5: SA Theatre (1960 – 1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Evaluate | |||||
Explanation of command verb | To determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth, or condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2-3 | High | 4 |
Both Ma and Tiemie made the mistake of becoming pregnant before marriage and in so doing trapping themselves in the suburban existence. (2 marks per similarity)
They are different in the sense that Ma has accepted her reality in contrast with Tiemie’s obsession of parting with her suburban existence. (2 marks per contrast)
(4)
4.5
Topic | 11.1: Theatre of Realism and Stanislavski 12.5: SA Theatre (1960 – 1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Applying | |||||
Command verb | Suggest | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Cause, argue, demonstrate, show that something exists or is the case. Put forward for consideration. Mention an idea, possible plan, or action for other people to consider. Produce an idea in mind | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Moderate to difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-3 | Middle | 4-6 | High | 7-8 |
Candidate must identify all aspects of the dramatic structure by referring to the plot:
Exposition: All necessary facts about the characters, their relationship towards each other and the situation are given to the audience. Tjokkie’s ability to see the future is the most important aspect in the exposition that drives the conflict and development of the drama. Tjokkie and Tiemie’s desire to leave the suburbs is also referred to.
The triggering event happens when Tjokkie pretends to ‘see’ the truth about Tiemie’s pregnancy after being urged to do so by Fe and others. This sets the conflict and development in motion towards the climax
The drama drives to a clear climax when Jakes attacks Tiemie and Tjokkie commits suicide.
The dénouement or falling action is short and to the point when Jake comes out of the house and throws the bloodied pulpit cloth to Ma.
Use the rubric at ANNEXURE A with the assessment of this question. (8)
4.6
Topic | 12.5: SA Theatre (1960 – 1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Name | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Specify time or place as something desired, suggested, or decided on. To identify, specify, or mention by name | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 0 | Middle | 1 | High | 2 |
Ma is referring to her own weakness for men and the fact that her lust caused her to become pregnant before marriage. The weakness can be seen as the weakness of the flesh. (2)
4.7
Topic | 10.2: SA Theatre 12’5: SA Theatre (1960 – 1994) | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Discuss | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Write about the topic in detail, taking into account or considering different issues or ideas or opinions related to it. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Procedural | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-5 | Middle | 6-9 | High | 10-12 |
Candidate might mention the following: (Give credit for own original thought)
Constant repetition establishes the importance of the ‘sien’-element (to see) in the development of the drama.
Refers to ‘sien’ on different levels. Not just supernatural ability to see the future but also the seeing or realisation of other people’s motives, to see through people, also to fix problems with the ability to see.
Each character wants Tjokkie to ‘see’ for a different reason: Giel - Tjokkie must see which horse will win; Ma – He must see what happened to her previous husband; Tiemie – He must see whether she is pregnant or not; Jakes – wants him to see if Tiemie is pregnant.
To see but also not to see – Fe wants Tjokkie to lie about Tiemie’s pregnancy in order to stop Jakes from possessing her.
Tjokkie says he can’t see when he wants to which alludes to his own will in the process – He is fighting against his ability.
Use the rubric at ANNEXURE C with the assessment of this question. (12)
TOTAL SECTION B: 40
SECTION C: CONTEMPORARY SOUTH AFRICAN THEATRE
QUESTION 5: NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH BY JOHN KANI
5.1
Topic | 12.6: Contemporary SA Theatre 12.7: Play text Contemporary SA Theatre | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Identify, name | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Recognise a problem, need, fact, etc. and to show what it is and that it exists. To prove who or what someone or something is. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2-3 | High | 4 |
Award ONE mark per fact mentioned:
5.2
Topic | 12.6: Contemporary SA Theatre 12.7: Play text Contemporary SA Theatre | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Identify, name | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Recognise a problem, need, fact, etc. and to show what it is and that it exists. To prove who or what someone or something is. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 0 | Middle | 1 | High | 2 |
Consider ANY answer that is in proximity to the following guideline:
The subtext is what’s going on beneath the lines – the unspoken themes, emotions, and ideas a play is trying to put across. An actor’s understanding of a show’s implicit meaning can really impact his performance. (2)
5.3
5.3.1
Topic | 12.6: Contemporary SA Theatre 12.7: Play text Contemporary SA Theatre | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Applying | |||||
Command verb | Suggest | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Cause, argue, demonstrate, show that something exists or is the case. Put forward for consideration. Mention an idea, possible plan, or action for other people to consider. Produce an idea in mind | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Moderate to difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-3 | Middle | 4-6 | High | 7-8 |
An actor playing the character of Mandisa has to think about the following:
5.3.2
Topic | 12.6: Contemporary SA Theatre 12.7: Play text, Contemporary SA Theatre | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Analyse | |||||
Command verb | Evaluate | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth, condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Meta cognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-3 | Middle | 4-6 | High | 7-8 |
Award TWO marks for an answer that is well-motivated and has an example from the play.
Use the rubric in ANNEXURE A. (8)
5.3.3
Topic | 11.1: Theatre of Realism and Stanislavski 11.10: Poor Theatre 11.11: Preparation of Practical Work 12.2: Theme Programme | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Evaluate | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth, condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Meta cognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Very difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-3 | Middle | 4-6 | High | 7-8 |
Mark holistically according to candidate’s own ideas and opinions. The following could be mentioned:
A character that is not believable will not draw the audience into the narrative of the play
The play is in the style of realism and demands characters to be well-rounded and psychologically believable.
The relationships between characters in this play are important and can only be portrayed effectively if each character is real and reacts truthfully and realistically towards the others.
All the characters develop and are affected by the happenings in the play – this character development can only be believable if the actor clearly uses motivation and considers cause and effect in their characterisation.
Use the rubric in ANNEXURE A. (8)
5.3.4
Topic | 11.9: Director Designer | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Creating | |||||
Command verb | Create | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Evolve from one’s own thought or imagination, as a work of art, an invention or something new. Cause to come to being. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Metacognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-3 | Middle | 4-7 | High | 8-10 |
Candidate selects a scene and writes notes to the actors
Use the rubric in ANNEXURE B to assess the response. (10)
[40]
OR
QUESTION 6: MISSING BY REZA DE WET
6.1
Topic | 11.7: Stylised Theatre 12.6: Contemporary SA Theatre 12.7: Play Text, Contemporary SA Theatre | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Motivate | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Provide a reason, present facts and arguments in support of doing, stating something. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Specific Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2-3 | High | 4 |
Magical realism is a seemingly realistic setting and characters containing aspects that are supernatural. (2 marks) Any example from the text such as the Constable’s transformation a further 2 marks. (4)
6.2.1
Topic | 12.6: Contemporary SA Theatre 12.7: Play text Contemporary SA Theatre | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Motivate | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Provide a reason, present facts and arguments in support of doing, stating something. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Specific Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 0 | Middle | 1-2 | High | 3 |
The play does comment on the patriarchal Afrikaner society (1 MARKS). A further 2 MARKS for referring to the character of Gabriel as ironically being a constant presence in the lives of the women and having to be served by them (food and the slop bucket) even though he has removed himself to the attic of the house where he is living. (3)
6.2.2
Topic | 12.6: Contemporary SA Theatre 12.7: Play text Contemporary SA Theatre | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Make Something clear, easy to understand by describing more in detail or revealing facts or information. Give a reason so as to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-3 | Middle | 4-6 | High | 7-9 |
Each of the three female characters represent a certain type of Afrikaner woman: All of them oppressed and subdued and unable to express their inner beings as sensual women.
Miem stays loyal and obedient towards her husband even though he has removed himself completely from both the household and the problems of a day to day existence. She is also a typical hospitable Afrikaner woman and is respectful towards her guests.
Gertie is a small, drab, middle-aged woman with her hair in a bun. She is a typical spinster and is very conservative. Her obsession with physical exercise and fresh air is a mask behind which she hides her sexual frustration.
Meisie is a pretty young woman with long hair and wears an old dress. Her posture is bent and her hands show signs of manual labour. She is typically obedient and is being oppressed and manipulated by Miem. (9)
6.3.1
Topice | 11.9: Director Designer 12.6: Contemporary SA Theatre 12.7: Play text Contemporary SA Theatr | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Creating | |||||
Command verb | Create | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Evolve from one’s own thought or imagination, as a work of art, an invention or something new. Cause to come to being. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Metacognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-2 | Middle | 3-4 | High | 5-6 |
TWO MARKS for a voice note and TWO MARKS for a physical note and TWO MARKS for a reference to the text.
As example:
Konstabel should have a confident, strong, conservative presence in the beginning and his movements should encourage trust through polite mannerisms. Like greeting them politely with a bow or pulling out the chair for Miem at the table. (6)
6.3.2
Topic | 11.9: Director Designer 12.6: Contemporary SA Theatre 12.7: Play text Contemporary SA Theatre | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Creating | |||||
Command verb | Create | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Evolve from one’s own thought or imagination, as a work of art, an invention or something new. Cause to come to being. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Metacognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-2 | Middle | 3-4 | High | 5-6 |
TWO MARKS for a voice note and TWO MARKS for a physical note and TWO MARKS for a reference to the text.
As example
His voice should become more like an announcer at a circus and his movements should become flamboyant and larger than life. When he opens the door for Meisie to go outside it could be accompanied by a grand gesture. (6)
6.4
Topic | 11.1: Theatre of Realism and Stanislavski 11.9: Director Designer 12.6: Contemporary SA Theatre 12.7: Play text Contemporary SA Theatre | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Creating | |||||
Command verb | Create | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Evolve from one’s own thought or imagination, as a work of art, an invention or something new. Cause to come to being. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Metacognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2-3 | High | 4 |
2 marks for a valid opinion and 2 marks for a valid motivation.
As example:
I would advise the actors to use the Stanislavski system since the style of the play is magical realism and it should have the appearance of realism. Stanislavski’s system is most effective for creating psychologically believable characters. (4)
6.5
Topic | 11.9: Director Designer 11.10: Poor Theatre | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Evaluate | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth, condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Meta cognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Very difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-3 | Middle | 4-6 | High | 7-8 |
Candidate should show awareness of the proscenium arch stage as being suitable to the realistic setting of Missing. Using Grotowski’s ideas about performance space as being a confrontation between actor and audience member would considerably change the style of the play.
Use the rubric in ANNEXURE A to assist in the assessment of this question. (8)
TOTAL SECTION C: 40
SECTION D: THEATRE HISTORY, PRACTICAL CONCEPTS, CONTENT AND SKILLS
QUESTION 7: THEATRE HISTORY, PRACTICAL CONCEPTS, CONTENT AND SKILLS
7.1
7.1.1
Topic | 10.1: Introduction to drama 10.12: Staging Conventions 10.13: Group Performance 11.1: Theatre of Realism and Stanislavski 11.12: Revision 12.2: Theme Programme | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Describe | |||||
Explanation of command verb | To give, narrate, relate, tell, describe, express a detailed account of | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2-3 | High | 4-5 |
ONE mark for correct theatre style mentioned and TWO marks per reason given with an explanation.
Realism
7.1.2
Topic | 10.1: Introduction to drama 10.12: Staging Conventions 10.13: Group Performance 11.1: Theatre of Realism and Stanislavski 11.12: Revision 12.2: Theme Programme | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Describe | |||||
Explanation of command verb | To give, narrate, relate, tell, describe, express a detailed account of | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-2 | Middle | 3-4 | High | 5-6 |
TWO marks per difference explained
Costumes
Setting
Body language (6)
7.1.3
Topic | 11.3: Voice and Body 11.6: Physical Theatre | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Identify | |||||
Explanation of command verb | To recognise a problem, need, fact, etc. and to show what it is and that it exists. To prove who or what someone or something is. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2-3 | High | 4 |
Candidate may select between SOURCE 1 and 4.
Award TWO marks per well-motivated statement or ONE mark per brief response.
The two sources may require more physical effort due to the evident use of the following:
7.1.4
Topic | 10.12: Staging Conventions 11.1: Theatre of Realism and Stanislavski | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Identify | |||||
Explanation of command verb | To recognise a problem, need, fact, etc. and to show what it is and that it exists. To prove who or what someone or something is. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Brief Constructed Response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2-3 | High | 4-5 |
SOURCE 3 and 4
The following are the conventions of realism the candidate may refer to when answering this question with regard to the sources. Mark holistically:
7.2
Topic | 10.4: Scene Study 10.13: Group performance 11.3: Voice and Body 11.11: Preparation of Practical 12.2: Theme/Audition Programme | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Discuss | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Write about the topic in detail, taking into account or considering different issues or ideas or opinions related to it. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Metacognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Very difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-3 | Middle | 4-7 | High | 8-10 |
Markers must consider the following:
Use the rubric in ANNEXURE B. (10)
7.3
Topic | 10.4: Scene Study 10.2: South African Theatre 11.4: SA Theatre 12.5: SA Theatre 1960-1994 12.6: Contemporary SA Theatre | |||||
Cognitive level difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Discuss | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Write about the topic in detail, taking into account or considering different issues or ideas or opinions related to it. | |||||
Complexity of thinking process | Procedural | |||||
Level of Complexity/Problem-solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed response | |||||
Weighting of mark allocation | Low | 1-3 | Middle | 4-7 | High | 8-10 |
Marker must consider the following from candidate’s response:
Mark holistically.
Use the rubric in ANNEXURE B. (10)
TOTAL SECTION D: 40
GRAND TOTAL: 150
ANNEXURE A:
QUESTION: 2.1.3, 3.2, 3.3, 4.5, 5.3.1, 5.3.2 and 6.5
DESCRIPTOR | MARKS | CANDIDATE DEMONSTRATES THE FOLLOWING: |
Outstanding Metacognitive Knowledge Create | 8 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Meritorious Procedural Knowledge Evaluate | 6-7 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Average Conceptual Knowledge Analyse | 4-5 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Elementary Factual knowledge Apply | 3 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Achieved Factual knowledge Understand | 2 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Not achieved Factual knowledge Remember | 0 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
ANNEXURE B: QUESTIONS: 2.5, 3.5, 5.3.4, 7.2 and 7.3
DESCRIPTOR | MARKS | CANDIDATE DEMONSTRATES THE FOLLOWING: |
Outstanding Metacognitive Knowledge Create | 9-10 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Meritorious Procedural Knowledge Evaluate | 7-8 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Average Conceptual Knowledge Analyse | 5-6 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Elementary Factual knowledge Apply | 3-4 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Achieved Factual knowledge Understand | 1-2 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Not achieved Factual knowledge Remember | 0 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
ANNEXURE C: QUESTION 4.7
DESCRIPTOR | MARKS | CANDIDATE DEMONSTRATES THE FOLLOWING: |
Outstanding Metacognitive Knowledge Create | 11-12 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Meritorious Procedural Knowledge Evaluate | 9-10 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Average Conceptual Knowledge Analyse | 7-8 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Elementary Factual knowledge Apply | 5-6 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Achieved Factual knowledge Understand | 3-4 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|
Not achieved Factual knowledge Remember | 0-2 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels
|