ACCOUNTING
GRADE 12
NOVEMBER 2020
MEMORANDUM
NATIONAL SENIOR CERTIFICATE
MARKING PRINCIPLES:
QUESTION 1
1.1
1.1.1 B (bad debts)
1.1.2 D (production wages)
1.1.3 E (bank charges)
1.1.4 C (depreciation of factory machinery)
1.1.5 A (raw material to production)
1.2 BERGVIEW MANUFACTURERS
1.2.1 FACTORY OVERHEAD COST NOTE
Salary of factory foremen | 150 000 |
Depreciation on factory equipment | 145 000 |
Indirect material (12 400 + 33 100 – 14 300) | 31 200 |
Insurance 60 000 x 3/6 or – 30 000 | 30 000 |
Water and electricity (115 000 + 12 000 ) x 80% OR 127 000 – 25 400 OR 92 000 + 9 600 | 101 600 |
Rent expense 113 000 x 7 200 / 9 000 OR 113 000 – 22 600 | 90 400 |
Be alert to various permutations of amounts and award marks accordingly | 548 200 *one part correct |
(16)
1.2.2 PRODUCTION COST STATEMENT FOR YEAR ENDED 29 FEBRUARY 2020
*one part correct
Direct material cost | 2 200 000 |
Direct labour cost | 1 209 300 |
Prime cost DMC + DLC | 3 409 300 |
Factory overhead cost see 1.2.1 | 548 200 |
Total production cost operation | 3 957 500 |
Work-in-progress at beginning | 130 000 |
4 087 500 | |
Work-in-progress at end balancing figure (accept +ve difference) | (40 500) |
Cost of production of finished goods (140 000 + 4 062 500– 155 500) 6 500 000 x 100/160 Accept alternative workings e.g. Ledger format | 4 047 000 |
(10)
-1 P Poor presentation (max -1) (no details); accept recognisable abbreviations such as DLC, FOHC
1.3 EASY FOODS
1.3.1 Explain why the change in units produced affected the fixed costs per unit.
Any ONE valid reason✓✓part marks for incomplete / unclear answer
1.3.2 Give TWO possible reasons for the increase in direct material cost per unit. Any TWO valid reasons✓✓part marks for incomplete / unclear answers
Reason 1
Reason 2
1.3.3 Explain why the business should not be satisfied with the level of production and the break-even point. Compare and quote figures for both years.
Comparison ✓ ✓figures for each year ✓✓✓✓
Any TWO of: Compare BEP of 2019 to production of 2019;
Compare production of 2019 to production of 2018
Compare BEP of 2019 to BEP of 2018
1.3.4 Explain ONE reason against this option.
ONE reason ✓ part marks for incomplete / unclear answers
TOTAL MARKS:45
QUESTION 2
2.1 VAT
No part marks for workings
Calculate the VAT amounts and indicate the effect of EACH.
DETAILS | VAT AMOUNT | EFFECT Accept + or – | |
Total sales | R81 675 | Increase | |
Purchases of stock | (i) | R26 235 | Decrease |
Drawings of stock | (ii) | R4 800 | Increase |
Bad debts | (iii) | R915 | Decrease |
2.2 BANK RECONCILIATION AND INTERNAL CONTROL
2.2.1 Show the entries that must be recorded in the Cash Journals.
Cash Receipts Journal (figures only) | two marks for both 11 850* 14 550* CRJ CPJ 33 500* 44 000* CRJ CPJ no part marks two marks for both* 600 (CRJ) 1 200 (CPJ) | Cash Payments Journal (figures only) |
65 570 | 64 790 | |
31 350 | 2 700* | |
150 | 10 500* | |
9 750 | ||
3 375 | ||
600* | ||
97 070 | 91 715 |
(10)
-1 foreign items (max -1) for any amount that earns a mark in 2.2.3.
2.2.2 Calculate the Bank Account balance on 30 April 2020.
See CRJ total See CPJ total
– 3 450 + 97 070 – 91 715 Accept ledger account format
CRJ and CPJ totals must include the provisional totals given
Answer:
1 905 one part correct
2.2.3 Bank Reconciliation Statement on 30 April 2020
One column method | Debit | Credit | |
Balance per Bank Statement | 11 955 | Balancing figure / could be debit | 11 955 Do not accept 19 500 |
Credit outstanding deposit | 27 750 | 27 750 | |
Debit outstanding cheques/EFT: | |||
No. 615 | (15 750) | 15 750 | |
No. 965 | (6 750) | 6 750 | |
No. 980 | (8 600) | 8 600 | |
EFT | (7 300) | 7 300 | |
Correction of error/wrong entry | 600 | 600 | |
Balance per Bank Account | 1 905 | 1 905 | see 2.2.2 (Dr / Cr) |
-1 Presentation (max -1) for no details | 40 305 | 40 305 |
-1 foreign items (max -1) for any amount that earns a mark in 2.2.1.
(9)
2.2.4 As internal auditor you are not happy with the control of cash in this business. Explain TWO problems to confirm your suspicion. Quote figures. Give advice on how EACH problem can be avoided in future.
Explanation with evidence | Advice | |
Problem 1 | - Theft / Fraud / Internal control measures are lacking. Cash slips have not been recorded, R10 500 . - Rolling of cash / security risk. Deposit of R50 400 occurs 14 days later / Deposit of R27 750 outstanding from 24 April. | - Supervision (checking) of cash slips against deposit slip / bank notifications (sms) for all transactions / Recon / EFT / Use security company for deposits - Cash collected must be deposited immediately/ Sales person must not deposit cash/Divide duties / Supervisor must check before depositing. |
Problem 2 | Delayed payments. Post-dated cheques; R15 750 (30 Oct 2020) and R6 750 (30 May 2020) | Purchase goods according to resources available; schedule / plan purchases (budget) |
Accept the same advice if appropriate / relevant to both problems identified, such as ‘Division of duties’.
(6)
2.3 DEBTORS' AGE ANALYSIS
2.3.1 Explain how the debtors' age analysis will assist the business in managing debtors' more effectively.
Valid explanation ✓✓✓✓part marks for incomplete / unclear answers
2.3.2 Explain TWO separate problems highlighted by the age analysis. Provide evidence for EACH.
Evidence must be shown. May be in explanation column; Accept name or explanation or amount.
Any TWO of:
Explanation | Evidence | |
Problem 1 | - Certain debtors are exceeding the credit terms (slow payers) possible bad debts - Debtors are exceeding credit limit | - D Duma, S Swart 90 days ; 60/90 days (1 425) (6 000; 12 750) - P Palm: 20% above limit R1 050 / (R6 300 – R5 250) |
Problem 2 | Granting slow-paying debtors to continue purchasing / to exceed credit limits (internal control) | D Duma, S Swart |
2.3.3 State TWO strategies that Tonga Hardware can use to ensure that only reliable applicants are granted credit.
Any TWO valid strategies ✓✓TWO different options form the list:
Perform credit checks (references / listing / credit bureau)
Check employment history / salary advice / bank statement
Contact details (residential or postal address / contact numbers or emails)
(2)
TOTAL MARKS: 45
QUESTION 3
3.1
3.1.1 First in first out FIFO
3.1.2 Weighted average method WA
3.1.3 Specific identification method SI / SIM Accept abbreviations
3.2 JJ FASHION HOUSE
3.2.1 Calculate: Value of the closing stock using the weighted-average method
1 858 200 two marks
(124 500 + 1 813 000) (130 x 610)
1 937 500 – 79 300 x 380
3 390 –130
(240 + 3 150)
3 260 two marks
WA: 570 four marks
Answer:
216 600 one part correct
Calculate: Gross profit
see above see above
2 764 800 – (1 858 200– 216 600)
1 937 500 – 79 300
1 641 600 two marks
IF UNITS ARE USED: (960 – 570) x 2 880
one mark one mmark one mark
Answer:
1 123 200 one part correct
3.2.2 Calculate how long (in days) it will take to sell the closing stock of the jeans.
see 3.2.1
216 600 x 365
1 641 600 see 3.2.1 (COS)
OR: IF UNITS ARE USED
one mark one mark one mark
380 x 365 OR 380
2 880 2 880 / 365
one mark one mark one mark
Answer:
48,2 days one part correct
3.2.3 Calculate: Value of closing stock using the FIFO method
400 – 130 270 x 610 = 164 700 one part correct 110 x 580 = 63 800 one part correct 380 – 270 see above
228 500 one part correct
State ONE advantage of using the FIFO method.
Any ONE point ✓ part marks for incomplete / unclear / partial responses
3.2.4 Calculate the number of jackets stolen.
(1 760 + 6 500)
8 260 – 2 980 – 5 020
OR – 8 260 + 2 980 + 5 020
Answer:
260 one part correct
Give TWO solutions to solve the problem. Any TWO valid points✓✓ part marks for incomplete / unclear / partial responses
Expected responses for 2 marks:
Solution 1
Solution 2
3.2.5 The internal auditor is concerned about the stock levels and selling price of jackets. Explain reasons for his concern, with figures, and give different advice in EACH case. Be alert to advice that may apply to both, such as ‘reduce mark-up%”
Concern | Explanation (with figures) | Advice |
Stock level | Stock holding period increased from (103 days) to 216 days (by 113 days) / high closing stock balance 2 980 (1 220 more than opening stock / 36% of available stock; possible obsolescence or theft | Clearance sale to get rid of excess stock / Order in line with demand |
Selling price | Mark-up % increased (from 70%) to 107% (to R1 450 or by R380) Customers find the price of R1 450 as being too high | Reduce mark-up% / selling price / Offer trade discounts / Advertise to increase customers |
TOTAL MARKS: 40
QUESTION 4
4.1
4.2 ORDINARY SHARE CAPITAL:
ISSUED SHARE CAPITAL
800 000 | Shares in issue at beginning | 4 800 000 |
400 000 | shares issued during year | 3 600 000 balancing figure |
(60 000) | shares re-purchased (ASP: R7.00) | (420 000) |
1 140 000 | shares in issue at end closing number of shares x R7.00 | 7 980 000 |
-1 P if no details (max -1) *one part correct
RETAINED INCOME:
Balance at beginning | 1 181 250 |
Net profit after tax | 2 534 400 |
Shares re-purchased 60 000 x R3,80 ignore brackets OR 648 000 – 420 000 10,80 – 7,00 | (228 000) |
Dividends ignore brackets operation | (2 377 200) |
Interim 1 200 000 x 124 cents or 124% or x 1,24 or 124/100 | 1 488 000 |
Final | 889 200 |
Balance at end operation; shares repurchased and OSD must be subtracted | 1 110 450 |
*one part correct
4.3 BALANCE SHEET (STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION) ON 31 MARCH 2020
ASSETS | |
Non-current assets | 11 458 500 |
Fixed assets at carrying value | 11 458 500 |
Current assets TA – 11 458 500 | 2 715 750 |
Inventories balancing figure | 1 303 850 |
Trade and other receivables (881 000+ 2 500 + 41 900 + 32 500) | 957 900 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 454 000 |
TOTAL ASSETS See Total Equity + Liabilities | 14 174 250 |
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | |
Ordinary shareholders' equity OSC + RI | 9 090 450 |
Ordinary share capital see 4.2 OSC | 7 980 000 |
Retained income 3 see 4.2 RI | 1 110 450 |
Non-current liabilities | 2 382 000 |
Mortgage loan: 642 000 two marks – 258 000 one mark (2 508 000 + 258 000 – 384 000) | 2 382 000 |
Current liabilities | 2 701 800 |
Trade and other payables* could include other CL items (1 318 000 + 32 000 + 65 000) | 1 415 000 |
Shareholders for dividends see 4.2 | 889 200 |
SARS: Income tax (985 600 – 972 000) # | 13 600 |
Current portion of loan see NCL above | 384 000 |
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES SE + NCL + CL | 14 174 250 *one part correct |
(34)
-1 foreign items (max -2); misplaced items: mark workings only. -1 Presentation (no details) max -1 # SARS: Income tax could be a DR (CA) if Income tax incorrectly calculated
TOTAL MARKS:65
QUESTION 5
5.1
5.1.1 External
5.1.2 Directors
5.1.3 Balance Sheet
5.1.4 Cash Flow Statement
5.2 BOMBAY LTD
CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR YEAR ENDED 29 FEBRUARY 2020
CASH EFFECTS OF OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |
Cash generated from operations | |
Interest paid | |
Income tax paid | |
Dividends paid 121 000 two marks 126 000 + 286 000 – 165 000 OR – 126 000 – 286 000 + 165 000 Accept other arrangements for calculations eg: brackets ; ledger account | (247 000) |
CASH EFFECTS OF INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |
Fixed assets purchased 4 830 000 + 34 500 + 312 600 – 3 760 100 OR – 4 830 000 – 34 500 – 312 600 + 3 760 100 Accept other arrangements for calculations eg: brackets ; ledger account | (1 417 000) |
Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets | 34 500 |
Change in fixed deposit | |
CASH EFFECTS OF FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |
Proceeds from shares issued | 1 240 000 |
Repurchase of shares 5 880 000 – 1 240 000 – 5 360 000 – 96 000 OR – 5 880 000 + 1 240 000 + 5 360 000 + 96 000 OR 120 000 one mark x 6,80 three marks Accept other arrangements for calculations eg: brackets ; ledger account | (816 000) |
Change in loan 1 300 000 – 950 000 one mark if 350 000 with no brackets | (350 000) |
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS operation (from bottom) | (82 700) |
Cash and cash equivalents (opening balance) | 56 400 |
Cash and cash equivalents (closing balance) – 28 800 + 2 500 | (26 300) one part correct |
one part correct and must be in brackets / if no brackets, full marks for workings If inappropriate use of brackets, or not, full marks cannot be earned on that line.
5.2.2 Calculate: % operating profit on sales
1 122 500 x 100
4 824 000
Answer:
23,3% one part correct; accept 23% express as %; sign not necessary
Calculate: Acid-test ratio
(NOTE: The current ratio is 1,6 : 1.)
774 000 x 1,6 two marks
(1 238 400 – 619 000) : 774 000
619 400 three marks
Answer:
0,8 : 1 one part correct as x : 1
Calculate: Net asset value (NAV) per share
6 422 800 two marks
(5 880 000 + 542 800) x 100
980 000 one part correct
(900 000 + 200 000 – 120 000)
Answer:
655,4 cents one part correct or 655 cents accept R6,55
Note: The 100 is not regarded as ‘one part correct’ for the method mark
5.3 TWO COMPANIES: LULU LTD AND COCO LTD
5.3.1 Explain which company has the better liquidity. Quote TWO financial indicators to support your opinion.
Part marks for incomplete / unclear / partial explanation
Explanation and Financial Indicators for Lulu:
Liquidity ratios of Lulu Ltd are more efficient than that of Coco Ltd.
Current ratio 1,7 : 1
Acid test ratio 0,9 : 1
OR
Explanation and Financial Indicators for Coco:
Liquidity ratios of Coco Ltd one mark are higher / they have more CA one mark
Coco has more liquid assets than stock (0,6 : 1 compared to 0,8 : 1 in Lulu)
Current ratio 4,2 : 1 one mark
Acid test ratio 3,6 : 1 one mark
5.3.2 Comment on the earnings per share and the % return on equity of Lulu Ltd. Give TWO reasons why the shareholders will be satisfied with these indicators. Quote figures.
Financial indicators with figures and trend ✓✓ Explanation
EPS increased (from 233 cents) to 273 cents (by 40 cents / 17,2%)
ROSHE increased (from 14%) to 25% (by 11% / 78,6%)
This exceeds the returns on alternative investments (such as interest on fixed deposits which is 6%).
5.3.3 Comment on the market value of the shares in Coco Ltd. Explain TWO points. Quote figures.
TWO valid points. ✓✓Figures ✓✓
5.3.4 Compare the dividend pay-out rates of both companies and explain why the directors of EACH company decided on these pay-out rates. Quote figures or calculations.
Lulu Ltd: 110c (DPS)/273 cents(EPS) or 40,3%
They retained 59,7% of the EPS for future growth / expansion
OR This is to benefit shareholders through the NAV and share price
Coco Ltd: 200c (DPS)/171 cents (EPS) or 117%
They decided to keep shareholders happy / reward shareholders for low dividends in previous years / have no plans for growth
Be alert to different presentation of information.
5.3.5 Noah says that the dividend of 110 cents per share he earned from Lulu Ltd is better than the dividend of 200 cents per share from Coco Ltd. Give ONE point to prove that he is incorrect. Quote figures or calculations.
ONE explanation / comparison (with figures)
No marks for individual / random amounts stated.
200 cents – 110 cents = 90 cents more per share was earned in Coco Ltd.
OR: He earned 90 cents more per share in Coco Ltd. four marks
Also be alert to learners who commented in the following way to prove Noah is correct:
In Lulu Ltd, he earned 110c on a share which cost him 700c (16%) two marks
In Coco Ltd, he earned 200 cents on a share which cost him 2 800c (7%) two marks
OR:
In total he earned dividends of R440 000 from Lulu Ltd, and R200 000 from Coco Ltd four marks
5.3.6 Comment on the risk and gearing of EACH company. Quote TWO financial indicators.
THREE marks per company: Financial Indicator with figure and Comment
Accept the correct figures (if financial indicators are not mentioned)
Lulu Ltd:
Debt/equity ratio is 0,8 : 1
ROTCE is 20%
Comment
The business makes extensive use of loans (high risk) /
ROTCE is higher than the interest rate of 13%, indicating positive gearing
Coco Ltd:
Debt/equity ratio is 0,2 : 1
ROTCE is 10%
Comment
The business does not rely on loans (low risk) /
ROTCE is lower than interest rate of 13%, indicating negative gearing
Arrangement of information may vary; financial indicators and/or comment may be compared in the same statement
5.3.7 Noah wants to buy shares in Lulu Ltd on the JSE at current market value to become the majority shareholder and CEO. Calculate how much Noah will have to pay for the shares that he needs.
Workings:
1 100 000 / 2 + 1 (550 001 – 400 000 ) x R9,50 = R1 425 009,50 one part correct
150 001 two marks
OR 50% + 100
(550 100 – 400 000) x R9,50 = R1 425 950
150 100
OR 51%
(561 000 – 400 000) x R9,50 = R1 529 500
161 000
OR 14% x 1 100 000 or 15% or 13,7%
154 000 x R9,50 = R1 463 000
TOTAL MARKS: 70
QUESTION 6
6.1
6.1.1 False
6.1.2 True
6.1.3 True Accept T or F
6.2 KURUMAN (PTY) LTD
6.2.1 Calculate the missing amounts indicated by (i) and (ii) in the Debtors' Collection Schedule.
41 250 x 38/100
Answer:
15 675 ✓✓ one part correct
16 530 x 100/38
OR 25 056 x 100/60 x 100/96
OR 130 500 x 25/75
Answer:
43 500 ✓✓ one part correct
Calculate the percentage discount allowed to debtors who settle in the month of the sales transactions.
990 three marks
41 250 x 60%
24 750 – 23 760 x 100
24 750
OR: July: June:
1 152 1 044
(28 800 – 27 648) (26 100 – 25 056)
28 800 26 100
4% one part correct as a %, sign not necessary
6.2.2 Calculate budgeted amounts:
Total sales
for July 2020
48 000 + 144 000
OR 48 000 x 100/25
OR 144 000 x 100/75
Answer:
192 000 one part correct
Payment to creditors during June 2020
123 750 + 41 250 / 41 250 x 100/25 / 123 750 x 100/75
165 000 ✓x 100/150✓ x 80%✓
OR 22 000 x 80/20
one mark two marks
Answer:
88 000 one part correct
Additional loan to be acquired on 1 June 2020
(7 500 – 6 000)
1 500 x 100/20 ✓ x 12✓
OR 1 500 x 12 / 20%
one mark one mark one mark
OR 450 000 – 360 000
two marks one mark
Be aware of alternative ways to calculate this figure
Answer:
90 000✓ one part correct
6.2.3 The directors did not adhere to the Cash Budget during May 2020. Identify TWO overpayments. Provide figures. Give a valid reason for EACH overpayment.
Overpayment (with figures) | Reason | |
Point 1 | Advertising Paid R8 400 or R2 800 more than budgeted or 50% over the budget | Wanted to increase sales OR Special clearance sales required greater advertising. |
Point 2 | Vehicle maintenance Paid R36 350 or R24 150 more than the budgeted or 198% over the budget | To get a reasonable price when vehicle was sold / in order to use vehicle until replaced OR Vehicles are old or damaged OR used more frequently for free deliveries to increase sales |
6.2.4 Why are the auditors concerned that the agreement with Tradecor is unethical or possibly a crime? Explain THREE points.
Any THREE valid concerns ✓✓✓ part marks for incomplete / unclear / partial responses
Point 1
Point 2
Point 3
Other valid answers
TOTAL MARKS:35
TOTAL:300