HISTORY
PAPER 1
GRADE 12  
NSC PAST PAPERS AND MEMOS
FEBRUARY/MARCH 2018

1. SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS 
1.1 The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-based  questions: 

1.2 The information below indicates how source-based questions are  assessed: 

• In the marking of source-based questions, credit needs to be given to any  other valid and relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or examples.
• In the allocation of marks, emphasis should be placed on how the  requirements of the question have been addressed. 
• In the marking guideline, the requirements of the question (skills that need to  be addressed) as well as the level of the question are indicated in italics.
• Learners are expected to take a stance when answering ‘to what extent’  questions in order for any marks to be awarded 

1.3 Assessment procedures for source-based questions 

• Use a tick (✔) for each correct answer 
• Pay attention to the mark scheme e.g. (2 x 2) which translates to two reasons  and is given two marks each (✔✔✔✔); (1 x 2) which translates to one reason  and is given two marks (✔✔) 
• If a question carries 4 marks then indicate by placing 4 ticks (✔✔✔✔) 

 Paragraph question  
Paragraphs are to be assessed globally (holistically). Both the content and  structure of the paragraph must be taken into account when awarding a mark. The  following steps must be used when assessing a response to a paragraph question:

• Read the paragraph and place a bullet (⚫) at each point within the text where  the candidate has used relevant evidence to address the question. 
• Re-read the paragraph to evaluate the extent to which the candidate has  been able to use relevant evidence to write a paragraph.
• At the end of the paragraph indicate the ticks (✔) that the candidate were  awarded for the paragraph as well as the level (1, 2 or 3), as indicated in the  holistic rubric and a brief comment, e.g.
  ______________⚫_____________________⚫________________________
  _____________________⚫__________________________ ✔✔✔✔✔
                                                                                                          Level 2
  Used mostly relevant evidence to write a basic paragraph. 
• Count all the ticks for the source-based question and then write the mark in the bottom right-hand margin, e.g. 32/50 
• Ensure that the total mark is transferred accurately to the front/back cover of  the answer script. 

2. ESSAY QUESTIONS 
2.1 The essay questions require candidates to:  

• Be able to structure their argument in a logical and coherent manner. They  need to select, organise and connect the relevant information so that they are  able to present a reasonable sequence of facts or an effective argument to  answer the question posed. It is essential that an essay has an introduction, a  coherent and balanced body of evidence and a conclusion. 

2.2 Marking of essay questions 

• Markers must be aware that the content of the answer will be guided by the  textbooks in use at the particular centre. 
• Candidates may have any other relevant introduction and/or conclusion than  those included in a specific essay marking guideline for a specific essay. 
• When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should be  credited for any other relevant answers. 

2.3 Global assessment of the essay 
The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires the  teacher to score the overall product as a whole, without scoring the component  parts separately. This approach encourages the learner to offer an individual  opinion by using selected factual evidence to support an argument. The learner will  not be required to simply regurgitate 'facts' in order to achieve a high mark. This  approach discourages learners from preparing 'model' answers and reproducing  them without taking into account the specific requirements of the question. Holistic  marking of the essay credits learners' opinions supported by evidence. Holistic  assessment, unlike content-based marking, does not penalise language  inadequacies as the emphasis is on the following: 

• The construction of argument 
• The appropriate selection of factual evidence to support such argument
• The learner's interpretation of the question.

2.4 Assessment procedures of the essay 
2.4.1 Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing the essay. 
2.4.2 During the first reading of the essay ticks need to be awarded for a relevant  introduction (indicated by a bullet in the marking guideline/memorandum),  each of the main points/aspects that is properly contextualized (also  indicated by bullets in the marking guideline/memorandum) and a relevant  conclusion (indicated by a bullet in the marking guideline/memorandum) e.g.  in an answer where there are 5 main points there will be 7 ticks. 
2.4.3 The following additional symbols can also be used: 

• Introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly contextualised  ^ 
• Wrong statement _________________ 
• Irrelevant statement |
                                   |
                                   | 
• Repetition R 
• Analysis A√ 
• Interpretation 1√ 

2.5. The matrix 
2.5.1 Use of the matrix in the marking of essays  
In the marking of essays, the criteria as provided in the matrix should be used.  When assessing the essay note both the content and presentation. At the point of  intersection of the content and presentation based on the seven competency  levels, a mark should be awarded. 
(a) The first reading of the essay will be to determine to what extent the  main aspects have been covered and to allocate the content level (on  the matrix). 

(b) The second reading of the essay will relate to the level (on the matrix)  of presentation. 

(c) Allocate an overall mark with the use of the matrix.

MARKING MATRIX FOR ESSAY: TOTAL: 50 

*Guidelines for allocating a mark for Level 1: 

• Question not addressed at all/totally irrelevant content; no attempt to structure the essay = 0
• Content selection includes basic and generally irrelevant information; no attempt to structure the  essay = 1–6
• Question inadequately addressed and vague; little attempt to structure the essay = 7–13 

SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS 
QUESTION 1: HOW DID THE DEPLOYMENT OF SOVIET MISSILES IN CUBA  INTENSIFY COLD WAR TENSIONS BETWEEN THE UNITED  STATES OF AMERICA AND THE SOVIET UNION? 
1.1 
1.1.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1] 

• Two years earlier the Eisenhower administration had hired members of the  Mafia to assassinate Castro 
• The USA had begun training anti-Castro Cuban exiles for an invasion of  Cuba/their homeland 
• The Kennedy administration had inherited the project that led to the Bay of Pigs
• Kennedy's administration sponsored a CIA campaign of harassment and  sabotage (any 2 x 1) (2)    

1.1.2 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1] 

• As Cuba's protector (To protect Cuba) 
• To deter American aggression/ CIA campaign of harassment and sabotage   (any 1 x 2) (2)  

1.1.3 [Interpretation of information from Source 1A – L2] 

• Castro was initially opposed to Soviet missile installation in Cuba
• Khrushchev convinced Castro as to why it was necessary to deploy missiles to Cuba 
• Castro eventually agreed with Khrushchev for the deployment of missiles to Cuba  
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4)    

1.1.4 [Interpretation of information from Source 1A – L2] 

• Make the USA/the world aware that Cuba had an alliance/relationship with the  Soviet Union 
• To show that Cuba would no longer be vulnerable to an attack by the USA 
• Show Cuba's sovereignty and independence 
• The Soviet Union had every right under international law to send the missiles 
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4)  

1.2 

1.2.1 [Interpretation of information from Source 1B – L2] 

• Shows evidence that Soviet missiles were deployed to Cuba, e.g. the missile  shelter tent 
• Evidence that the missile site was concealed/hidden (the missile site is  surrounded by dense vegetation) 
• The photograph shows Cuba is arming/militarising itself to counter American  aggression (missile erector) 
• The photograph shows the deployment of Soviet military equipment (oxidizer  tank trailers) to Cuba 
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2 ) (4)

1.2.2 [Ascertain the usefulness of the evidence in Source 1B – L3] 
Learners MUST take a stance on the usefulness of the source in order to be  awarded any marks 
The source is USEFUL to a large extent because:  

• It is an original source, a photograph taken on 14 October 1962 
• It is relevant as it depicts equipment deployed by the Soviet Union to Cuba
• The source can be corroborated by many other sources on the deployment of  missile to Cuba  
• It provides information on the type of missiles which had been installed by the  Soviet Union 
• It shows the missile site which became a threat to the security of the USA
• Any other relevant response  

The source is USEFUL to a lesser extent because: 

• The CIA could have been subjective in identifying what they considered as  threats as depicted in the photograph 
• The photograph serves as a propaganda tool for the USA 
• The photograph could have been manipulated  
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4)   

1.3 
1.3.1 [Extraction of information from Source 1C – L1] 

• The defence of the United States of America ('our own security') 
• The defence of the entire Western Hemisphere (2 x 1) (2) 

1.3.2 [Explanation of a historical concept from Source 1C – L1] 

• A strict quarantine was imposed by the USA to prevent offensive military  equipment being shipped to Cuba/the USA tried to stop the shipment of  missiles to Cuba 
• To physically prevent Soviet vessels from carrying missiles to Cuba
• Any other relevant response (any 1 x 2) (2)    

1.3.3 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1] 

• To halt this offensive build-up, a strict quarantine will be initiated on all offensive  military equipment 
• Increased close surveillance of Cuba and its military build-up 
• I have directed the Armed Forces…any eventualities 
• To regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the  Western Hemisphere as an attack by the Soviet Union 
• Dismantling and withdrawal of all offensive weapons in Cuba 
• Called upon Khrushchev to halt and eliminate … solutions (any 2 x 1) (2) 

1.3.4 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2] 

• To inform American citizens about the deployment of Soviet missiles to Cuba
• To assure US citizens that Kennedy and his administration were in control 
• To inform the American citizens of the steps he intended taking against the  Soviet Union (if learners use an example credit should be given)
• To win the support of the US government in his ideological war against the  Soviet Union 
• To threaten the Soviet Union to withdraw its missiles from Cuba 
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4)   

1.4 [Comparison of evidence in Source 1B and Source 1C –L3] 

• Source 1B shows the deployment of Soviet missiles to Cuba and in Source 1C  Kennedy refers to the deployment of missiles as a threat to the security of the  USA and the entire Western hemisphere 
• Source 1B shows a build-up of offensive military equipment on the USA's  doorstep (Cuba) and in Source 1C Kennedy reacted by imposing a quarantine  (blockade) of offensive military equipment to Cuba 
• The military equipment in Source 1B was within reach of American cities and in  Source 1C Kennedy responded by calling on the US armed forces to be  prepared for any eventuality 
• Both Sources 1B and 1C indicate that the missiles were hidden/secretly  deployed  
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4) 

1.5 
1.5.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1D – L1] 

• To strengthen its (Cuba’s) defensive potential  
• Allowing Cuba to live peacefully 
• Develop as its people desire (2 x 1) (2)   

1.5.2 [Interpretation of information from Source 1D – L2] 

• To challenge the USA in terms of the US missiles in Turkey/Italy 
• To provide a deterrent to a potential US attack against Cuba 
• To show the USA and the rest of the world its (USSR) power and strength
• To spread/strengthen communism in Cuba/Latin America 
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4)  

1.5.3 [Extraction of information from Source 1D – L1] 

• Respect the integrity of the frontiers  
• Respect the sovereignty of Turkey 
• Not to intervene in Turkey's domestic affairs 
• Not to invade Turkey 
• Not to make its territory as a place d'armes (military base) for an invasion
• Restrain others who would think about launching an attack on Turkey from the  Soviet territory (any 2 x 1) (2) 

1.6 [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of evidence from relevant sources – L3] Candidates could include the following aspects in their response: 

• The Soviet Union's involvement in Cuba (Source 1A)  
• The USA established EXCOMM which discussed different options regarding the  deployment of missiles to Cuba (own knowledge) 
• Meetings were held between Kennedy and Gromyko (own knowledge)
• The 14 October 1962 photographs indicated the installation of Soviet missile  sites in Cuba (Source 1B) 
• Deployment of Soviet missiles to Cuba led to surveillance by the USA (Source  1B) 
• Kennedy announced a blockade and further steps that were to be taken against  the Soviet Union (Source 1C) 
• The US armed forces were ready for any eventuality (Source 1C) 
• Kennedy accused the Soviet Union of threatening world peace (Source 1C)
• Khrushchev responded to Kennedy and indicated the danger of US missiles  that were placed in Turkey (Source 1D) 
• Both Kennedy and Khrushchev communicated via letters (intensification of Cold  War) (Source 1D / own knowledge) 
• Any other relevant response   (8)   [50]

Use the following rubric to allocate a mark: 

QUESTION 2: WHY DID CUBA BECOME INVOLVED IN THE ANGOLAN CIVIL  WAR IN 1975? 
2.1 
2.1.1 [Explanation of a historical concept from Source 2A – L1] 

• Leaders of nationalist/liberation movements in Angola working together to form  a government 
• The Alvor Agreement led to power sharing among the leaders of the three  nationalist movements (MPLA, UNITA and FNLA) / leading political role players  until multi-party elections were held in November 1975 
• Any other relevant response (1 x 2) (2)   

2.1.2 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]  

• The Alvor Agreement had been strongly endorsed by other African countries  through the OAU (1 x 2) (2)  

2.1.3 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2] 

• The MPLA, UNITA and the FNLA requested support from foreign countries who  had supported their struggle for independence  
• Angola was strategically important and rich in minerals – both sides in the Cold  War wanted Angola within their sphere of influence 
• The MPLA was supported by Cuba and the Soviet Union (Communism)
• UNITA was supported by South Africa and the USA (Capitalism) 
• The civil war between the MPLA and UNITA became of an ideological conflict  between capitalism and communism  
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4) 

2.2 
2.2.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]  

• The given situation on the ground of our movement and the country
• The exploratory trip by the official Cuban delegation (any 1 x 2) (2) 

2.2.2 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]  

• To establish a military school for cadres 
• To create a company of security staff 
• A ship to transport war material from Dar es Salaam 
• Weapons 
• Means of transportation (any 2 x 1) (2) 

2.2.3 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1] 

• Communism/Socialism (1 x 2) (2)

2.2.4 [Evaluate the usefulness of evidence in Source 2B – L3] 
 The source is USEFUL because: 

• It gives first-hand information (letter) from the leader of MPLA (Neto) to Cuba  (Castro)  
• The letter requesting military assistance was delivered on 26 January 1976 less  than two weeks after the MPLA had agreed to power sharing deal at Alvor
• The information in the letter can be corroborated by other sources
• The information is relevant to research Cuba's involvement in the Angolan Civil  War 
• The information sheds light on the specific requests for military assistance from  Castro  
• Any other relevant answer (any 2 x 2) (4) 

2.3 
2.3.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1] 

• A battalion of regular troops 
• Anti-tank weapons (2 x 1) (2) 

2.3.2 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1] 

Related Items

• To help the Angolan patriots resist the South African invasion (1 x 2) (2) 

2.3.3 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C – L2] 

• Castro argued that Cuba alone bore responsibility for their involvement in  Angola, they did not follow Soviet Union orders 
• Castro argued that the Soviet Union had worked with the Cubans to support the  MPLA in Angola 
• Castro considered the relationship between the Soviet Union and Cuba, with  regards to the MPLA, to be based on equal relations which were 'extraordinarily  respectful' 
• Only the Cuban Communist Party could make the decision to send troops to  support MPLA in Angola 
• Castro shared the same ideology (communism) with the MPLA and the Soviet  Union 
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4) 

2.3.4 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2C – L2] 

• The USA (Ford and Kissinger) had spread the lie that Cuba was only involved  in Angola because of Soviet Union orders  
• They did not want to accept that Cuba had acted on its own  
• Any other relevant response (2 x 2) (4) 

2.4 
2.4.1 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D – L2] 

• Angola is controlled by foreign powers; both Cuba and the USSR are shown  'winding up' Angola as though they were a clockwork toy with no ability to act  independently 
• The cartoon suggests that Cuba is controlling Angola but Cuba is controlled by  the USSR; Cuba is also a wind-up toy without the ability to act independently
• The Soviet Union is spreading communism through Cuba to Angola (the key  which the USSR used to 'wind-up' Cuba is represented as a hammer and  sickle, a symbol of communism) 
• The Soviet Union is more powerful than Cuba and Angola (shown by the  relative size of figures depicted in cartoon) 
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4) 

2.4.2 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D – L2] 

• The hammer and sickle is the symbol of communism  
• The hammer and sickle is the symbol of workers and farmers  
• The USSR was responsible for spreading the Communist ideology to Cuba and  indirectly to Angola 
• Any other relevant answer (any 2 x 2) (4) 

2.5 [Comparison of evidence from Sources 2C and 2D – L3] 

• Source 2C is a communist viewpoint of Cuba’s assistance to the MPLA in  Angola, whereas Source 2D is an America viewpoint of the Soviet Union’s  involvement in Cuba and Angola 
• In Source 2C Castro states that Cuba's involvement in Angola was their  decision alone; while in Source 2D the cartoonist suggests that Cuba was acting under Soviet control 
• In Source 2C Castro states that the Soviet Union had sent support directly to  Angola; while in Source 2D the cartoonist suggests that the USSR was using  Cuba as an intermediary (a 'middle man') rather than sending direct support 
• In Source 2C Castro says that the USSR is 'extraordinarily respectful' in its  relationship with Cuba while in Source 2D the cartoonist gives the impression  that Cuban independence or viewpoints were not taken into consideration, they  were a 'puppet' or a 'toy' of the USSR's communist ideology  
• Any other relevant answer (any 2 x 2) (4)

2.6 [Interpretation, analysis and synthesis of evidence from relevant sources – L3]  Candidates could include the following in their response: 

• South Africa invaded Angola so Cuba came to the MPLA's defence (Source 2A and 2C) 
• The civil war in Angola turned into a Cold War struggle and Cuba was  committed to defending the MPLA against an attack from the West (Source 2A)
• Neto (MPLA) asked Cuba for specific assistance, for example a military school,  a ship to transport war materials, weapons (Sources 2B and 2C) 
• Neto (MPLA) was committed in the 1970s to establishing an independent,  democratic and communist Angola, Cuba shared this ideology (Source 2B)
• Cuba was committed to supporting Angola in their struggle for independence  from colonialism (Source 2C) 
• The USA claimed that Cuba was involved in Angola because of the USSR  (Sources 2C and 2D) 
• Cuba was under the control of Soviet communist ideology (Source 2D)
• Cuba was committed to fighting against imperial forces (own knowledge)
• Cuba and Angola had historical links as a result of slavery (own knowledge) 
• Any other relevant response   (8)  [50]

Use the following rubric to allocate a mark: 

QUESTION 3: HOW DID THE BLACK POWER MOVEMENT MOBILISE AFRICAN  AMERICANS DURING THE 1960s? 
3.1 
3.1.1 [Explanation of a historical term from Source 3A – L1] 

• An idea that wanted African Americans to work together and establish  community programmes to improve socio-economic conditions 
• A philosophy that grew out of the Civil Rights Movement in the USA in the 1960s that promoted black pride 
• A philosophy that promoted social equality through the creation of political and  cultural institutions among African Americans 
• A call to African Americans to promote their culture, identity, self-reliance and  self-defence 
• Any relevant response (any 1 x 2) (2) 

3.1.2 [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1] 

• To call African American people in this country to unite 
• To bargain from a position of strength  
• To share in the total power of the society 
• To recognise African American heritage 
• To build a sense of community  
• For African Americans to define their own goals 
• For African Americans to lead their own organisations and support those  organisations (any 2 x 1) (2) 

3.1.3 [Extraction of evidence from Source 3A – L1] 

• There has been no national organisation which could speak to the growing  militancy of young black people 
• The Civil Rights Movement's tone has been adapted to middle class whites
• It served as a sort of buffer zone between that audience and angry young black Americans 
• It claimed to speak for the needs of a community, but it did not speak in the  tone of that community 
• None of its so-called leaders could go into a rioting community and be listened  to (any 2 x 1) (2) 

3.1.4 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3A – L2] 

• Integration was a token of change offered by the US Federal government
• Integration would mostly benefit black moderates who were in the minority
• African Americans were expected to adapt / assimilate to a white American lifestyle 
• According to the philosophy of Black Power it did not recognise African Americans as equal to white Americans 
• White Americans were still in a superior position / Black people were perceived  as inferior 
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4)

3.2 
3.2.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 3B – L1] 

• Political oppression 
• Economic exploitation 
• Social degradation (3 x 1) (3) 

3.2.2 [Interpretation of evidence in Source 3B – L2]  

• The US government preached democracy to the whole world but failed to apply  it in its own country (African Americans still faced obstacles to education,  registration to vote, job reservations) 
• The Federal government failed to enforce the constitution of the USA (e.g. the  qualified right to vote, poor living conditions, social inequalities) 
• The rights of African Americans were not protected in courts of law
• African Americans continued to face police brutality 
• Discrimination (social, economic and political) against African Americans was  still vigorously applied in most states in the USA 
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4)  

3.2.3 [Interpretation of evidence in Source 3B – L2] 

• The Black Power philosophy demanded that African Americans start doing  things for themselves 
• To show African Americans what they could achieve if they were united
• They helped African Americans not to rely on moderate whites for help/ support 
• They helped African Americans to adopt the principle of self-reliance
• They helped African Americans to promote unity and pride among themselves
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4) 

3.2.4 [Evaluate the usefulness of the evidence in Source 3B – L3] 
The source is USEFUL because: 

• It gives first-hand information (speech) by Malcolm X, leader of the Black Power  Movement  
• It highlights how African Americans were mobilised to fight for themselves
• The speech was delivered in 1964 at the time when the Black Power Movement was growing 
• The information in the speech can be corroborated by other sources
• It sheds light on the philosophy of the Black Power Movement 
• It highlights the challenges that the African Americans had to face
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4) 

3.3 
3.3.1 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3C – L2] 

• It shows the success of the Black Panther Party's Community Programmes (e.g. African American women received free food parcels) 
• It shows the philosophy of self- reliance which was advocated by Black Panther Party 
• It shows African Americans working together to uplift their respective communities
• It shows that the Black Panther Party had its own newspaper to conscientise  African Americans 
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4) 

3.3.2 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3C – L2] 

• The newspaper spread the Black Power philosophy 
• It enlightened African Americans about their rights 
• It increased access to information for poor African American families
• It provided information on activities/programmes of the Black Panther Party and  Black Power movement in general 
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4) 

3.4 [Comparison of evidence from Sources 3A and 3C - L3] 

• In Source 3A Stokely Carmichael called on African Americans to build a sense  of community and in Source 3C African American women were seen benefiting  from community programmes 
• Source 3A states that African Americans should lead their own organisations  and Source 3C shows one of the programmes of the Black Panther Party, a  black led, community based organisation 
• Both Sources 3A and 3C promoted the goals and ideas of Black Power 
• Any other relevant response (any 2 x 2) (4)   

3.5 
3.5.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 3D – L1] 

• Repressed the political possibility the Black Panther Party represented 
• Belittled the Black Panther Party  
• Federal agents sought to promote factionalism  
• Attacked the Black Panther Party as enemies of the state 
• FBI promoted violent conflict between Black Panther leaders 
• Prevented black nationalist groups and leaders from gaining respectability by  discrediting them (any 1 x 2) (2) 

3.5.2 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 3D – L2] 

• Wanted to reduce the influence of the Black Panther Party 
• Wanted to prevent the Black Panther Party from getting support from the  moderate African and white Americans 
• Wanted to reduce the spread of the Black Panther Party's revolutionary ideas
• Any other relevant response (any 1 x 2) (2) 

3.5.3 [Extraction of evidence from Source 3D – L1] 

• Forged documents 
• Paid provocateurs 
• Supplied them with explosives 
• Incited members to blow up public buildings 
• Promoted kangaroo courts  
• Encouraging Panther members to torture suspected informants (any 1 x 1) (1) 

3.6 [Interpretation, evaluation and synthesis of evidence from relevant sources – L3]   
 Candidates could include the following aspects in their response:

• The Black Power Movement called for African Americans to unite (Source 3A)
• The Black Power Movement inspired African Americans not to accept being  discriminated against (Source 3A) 
• The Black Power Movement influenced African Americans to recognise their  heritage, to set their own goals and to lead own organisations (Source 3A)
• Leaders of the Black Power Movement exposed the limitations of the Civil  Rights Movement, which resulted in young African Americans joining the Black  Panther Party (Source 3A) 
• The Black Power Movement encouraged African American to stand up against  political oppression, economic exploitation and social degradation (Source 3B)
• The Black Power Movement encouraged African Americans to be militant  (Source 3B)  
• The Black Power Movement encouraged African Americans to fight their own  battles (own knowledge) 
• The Black Panther Party established different programmes to uplift African American communities (Source 3C) 
• The Black Panther Party published community-based newspapers to keep African American communities informed of their rights and matters which affected them (Source 3C) 
• Black Panther leaders cautioned its members about the possible infiltration by  the FBI (Source 3D) 
• The Black Panther Party established legal offices and provided legal advice to  African Americans (own knowledge) 
• The Black Panthers monitored the police to ensure that they did not abuse their power (own knowledge) 
• Any other relevant response   (8)  [50]

Use the following rubric to allocate a mark: 

SECTION B: ESSAY QUESTIONS 
QUESTION 4: CASE STUDY – CHINA 
[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical and interpretative skills] 
SYNOPSIS  
Candidates are expected to explain whether Mao Zedong's policies of the Great Leap  Forward and the Cultural Revolution were a dismal failure or not. They should refer to  Mao Zedong's policies between 1958 and 1969. 
MAIN ASPECTS  
Candidates could include the following aspects in their response:  

• Introduction: Candidates should state whether they agree or disagree with the  statement. They need to highlight whether Mao Zedong's policies of the Great Leap  Forward and Cultural Revolution were a dismal failure or not and indicate how they  would support their line of argument. 

ELABORATION 
In agreeing with the statement, candidates could include the following points in  their answer:  

• Mao’s rise to power, the first five year plan and the hundred flowers campaign  (background)  
• Mao's policies included the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution which  was an attempt to entrench communism 

The Great Leap Forward: 

• Mao Zedong's Second Five Year Plan that started in 1958 
• It aimed to industrialise China to overtake capitalist countries; improve agricultural  production to equal western countries 
• End privatisation  
• Rural cooperatives were amalgamated into 'People's Communes' (collectivisation) 
• Forceful amalgamation of farmers into 'people's communes' 
• Propaganda used to promote production 

How the Chinese responded to the Great Leap Forward:  

• Owing to bad planning; poor support to peasants; corrupt local officials; high taxation  on farm products; backyard industries produced inferior goods; industries collapsed
• It depended on peasants rather than on machinery to industrialise China
• It encouraged peasants to set up backyard industries (industrialisation on the  countryside) 
• It resulted in famine which led to the starvation of millions of people
• The economy collapsed 
• The Great Leap Forward failed within 3 years, also referred to as 'Three Bitter Years' /  the ‘Great Leap Backwards’
• Mao Zedong was forced to allow a return to some form of capitalism
• This resulted in the Great Leap forward being a dismal failure 
• Mao eventually admitted that mistakes had been made and resigned as President of  China but kept his job as Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party
• In 1962 he handed over responsibility for the economy to President Liu Shaoqi and  CCP general secretary Deng Xiaoping and withdrew from the political scene 

The Cultural Revolution:  

• The intentions of China's Communist party (practical policies to improve economy;  authoritarian form of government; empower landless peasant farmers; land reform  process; nationalisation of heavy industries) 
• Classless society (focused on improving conditions of peasants and workers;  educated all Chinese to work together for a better China)  
• He launched the Cultural Revolution in 1966 to regain the power he lost after the  failure of the Great Leap forward 
• He set up the Red Guards who: studied and spread ideas in the Little Red Book;  educated peasants on principles of Communism; taught reading and writing; set up  the purges (opponents of Communism & moderates were eliminated and millions of  opponents of Communist were killed); destroyed anti-communist art and books 
• The Role of the Red Guards (Campaign to attack the 'Four Olds': changing of old  ideas, traditional culture, customs and habits) 
• Huge demonstrations were held in Tiananmen Square, Beijing and posters and  pictures of Mao were put up everywhere  
• The Little Red Book (contained Mao's philosophies about Communism; all citizens  expected to memorise principles of communism; a source of Communist propaganda  in China)  
• Elimination of officials: Deng Xiaoping and Liu Shaoqi were removed from office; got  rid of professionals (engineers, scientists, educators etc.) 
• Closure of schools, colleges and universities (for being critical, liberal and elitist)
• Industry suffered and production stopped by 1968 
• Any other relevant response  
• Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion.  

If candidates should state they disagree, they should substantiate their line of  argument with relevant historical evidence. [50]
QUESTION 5: INDEPENDENT AFRICA: COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY – THE  CONGO AND TANZANIA 
[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical and  interpretative skills] 
SYNOPSIS 
In writing this essay, candidates should show how both Mobuto Sese Seko in the Congo  and Julius Nyerere in Tanzania promoted economic, social and cultural development after  their countries gained independence from colonial rule. Candidates should substantiate  their answers with reference to economic, social and cultural policies. 
MAIN ASPECTS 
Candidates could include the following aspects in their response: 

• Introduction: Candidates should contextualise the question by mentioning that the  economies of the Congo and Tanzania were undeveloped at the time of  independence. In addition colonialism had undermined and de-valued African culture  and social structures. Leaders of the Congo and Tanzania both promoted economic,  social and cultural development within their countries after decolonisation.  

ELABORATION 
ECONOMIC 

• The Congo and Tanzania inherited single-product from their respective colonisers;  The Congo embraced a capitalist economic system; whereas Tanzania adopted a socialist economic model. Both struggled to develop their economies 
• At independence the Congo and Tanzania lacked a vibrant manufacturing industry 
• The Congo aimed to industrialise the economy and develop a manufacturing base  (largely failed); whereas Tanzania built on its agricultural base, villagisation policy and  Ujamaa (faced opposition from independent African farmers)  
• The Congo relied heavily on foreign aid and expertise from the early 1960s; whereas  Tanzania attempted to be self-sufficient and rejected neo-colonialism
• Both countries remained reliant on the export of agricultural products and minerals
• Mobutu and Nyerere nationalised land and industry to distribute wealth equally 
• Neither the Congo nor Tanzania had oil reserves so both suffered economic crisis  when oil prices rose in the 1970s  
• Both Mobutu (1970s) and Nyerere (1980s) decided to privatise sectors of the economy  due to an economic crisis 
• Both countries took loans from foreign countries and organisations; from the 1960s the  Congo received financial aid from the capitalist west; while from the 1980s Tanzania  was forced to take World Bank loans and was subjected to structural adjustment  policies 
• The Congo's economy was characterised by elitism and nepotism; whereas Tanzania  reduced corruption of government officials through a 'Leadership Code'
• The economy of the Congo produced vast differences in wealth between rich and  poor; while Tanzania attempted to minimise economic inequality

SOCIAL AND CULTURAL 
Education and language 

• Colonial education promoted Eurocentric values 
• Under colonialism few African children received more than a primary education. The  Congo and Tanzania had a few qualified technicians and engineers  
• Children were taught European history and languages and western knowledge was  privileged over African knowledge 

Education in Tanzania 

• Nyerere promoted the use of Swahili (a common language spoken by most  Tanzanians) over English 
• Between 1961 and 1981 illiteracy in Tanzania dropped from 80% to 20%. But as few  resources given to tertiary education. Primary school enrolments rose 
• Structural adjustment in the 1980s resulted in drastic cuts made in social spending  resulting in lack of textbooks, desks and teachers  
• Nyerere (Tanzania) wrote a pamphlet 'Education for self-reliance' (1967) – he  expanded primary education in rural areas and focussed on basic literacy 

Education in the Congo 

• In the Congo at independence there were 14 university graduates and therefore after  independence, the higher education system was expanded  
• Between 1960-1974 primary education in the Congo rose from 1.6 million to 4.6 million
• French remained the language of instruction in the Congo 

Africanisation 

• In Tanzania: Villagisation – Nyerere, promoted 'traditional' community values through  Ujamaa ('familyhood') villages; Tanzanians were encouraged to focus on agriculture,  traditional values and becoming self-reliant. Tanzanians worked the land communally  rather than producing cash crops for export 
• In the Congo: Zairianisation: Mobuto promoted African beliefs and culture through his  policy of authenticité.  
• Mobuto encouraged people to wear African clothing, play and listen to African music  and eat African food  
• Mobuto renamed many towns and cities in the Congo with African names (e.g. Leopoldville became Kinshasa  

CLOTHING 

• Mobutu and Nyerere adopted Kwame Nkrumah and Maoist style of dressing 

ART 

• Promotion of African art in literature as well as in handcraft 
• Any other relevant response  
• Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion. [50]

QUESTION 6: CIVIL SOCIETY PROTESTS FROM THE 1950s TO THE 1970s:  THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT 
[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical and  interpretative skills] 
SYNOPSIS 
Candidates should explain to what extent the various forms of protests by the civil rights  activists were successful in ensuring that all Americans regardless of race were treated  equally in the United States of America in the 1960s. Candidates must select examples of  mass-based, non-violent protest that the Civil Rights Movement embarked on such as  Montgomery Bus Boycott, sit-ins, mass demonstrations and marches until the passing of  the Civil Rights Act in 1964 and the Voters Act in 1965.  
MAIN ASPECTS 
Candidates could include the following aspects in their response: 

• Introduction: Candidates should take a stance by explaining to what extent various  forms of protests by the civil rights activists were successful in ensuring that all  Americans regardless of race were treated equally in United States of America. 

ELABORATION 
Candidates can agree to a large extent: 

• Background – segregation and discrimination in the United States of America
• Background - Montgomery Bus Boycott (1955) – Protest action by Rosa Parks  resulted in a mass boycott of city's bus systems; Martin Luther King Jnr rose to  prominence and argued for non-violent mass protest. Led to desegregation on busses  by the end of 1955, Federal court declared segregation of public transport  unconstitutional 
• Sit-Ins (from 1960) – (Greensboro, North Carolina, four students staged a 'sit-in' at a  'whites-only' lunch counter; (In summer 1961 businesses in Greensboro  desegregated); Sit-in spread across the segregated south; Black and white students  formed the Student non-violent Coordinating Committee to support Civil Rights  Movement; Concept of 'sit-in' spread to other segregated facilities such as 'pray-ins',  'read-ins', 'wade-ins' – six lunch counters in Nashville changed their policy and  desegregated their counters  
• 'Freedom Riders' (non-racial/non-violent) – ('sat-in' buses and travelled from north  to deep south to test new federal laws prohibiting segregation on national bus system  attacked by mobs, bombed, thrown in jail and not protected by local police – thousands volunteered and President Kennedy was forced to order federal marshals  to protect Freedom Riders; Tough new legislation introduced by federal order  1 November 1961 officially desegregated all interstate public facilities 
• Demonstrations and Marches: 
• Birmingham 1963: (Mass demonstrations, including a children's march were met with  violent and vicious reaction from police (water cannons, dogs, etc. all used to terrorise  non-violent protestors) President Kennedy stated on TV that 'racial segregation' was a  'moral issue' which 'had no place in American life'. On 10 May 1963 the city's  businesses and municipality announced that municipal facilities would be  desegregated. Attacks and murders of African Americans in the city continued  (Medgar Evans, Bombing of 16th Street Baptist church) 
• March on Washington 1963: (250 000 people took part in a non-racial, non-violent  march on Washington to demand full equality and jobs; Martin Luther King Jnr gave 'I  have a dream speech').  
• Selma-Montgomery marches (March 1965): (To demand that African American be  allowed to register to vote (only 2.5% of black people were registered voters due to  intimidation and racist attacks) – after three attempts, brutal police attacks on non violent demonstrators (Bloody Sunday) and mass support from across the country  they reached Montgomery. President Johnson was pressurised to pass the 1965 Voting Rights Act) 
• Freedom Summer (1964) – (Thousands of activists and volunteers (more than 70 000 students many from northern states, local SNCC, CORE and NAACP activists) worked  to register African Americans in Mississippi and teach in Freedom Schools (literacy,  history); Activists and volunteers were met with violence from white segregationist  mobs and police officers; 1964 (2 July) Civil Rights Act passed – barred  discrimination and segregation in employment and all public facilities 
• 1965 (6 August) Voting Rights Act passed – (outlawed obstacles (such as literacy  tests, poll taxes) to voting which had been put in place to prevent black people  registering as voters; CRM achieved equality before the law 
• Any other relevant response 
• Conclusion: Candidates should tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion  

If candidates should state they agree to a lesser extent, they should substantiate  their line of argument with relevant evidence  [50] 

TOTAL: 150