INFORMATION FOR THE MARKER
In assessing a candidate's work, the following aspects, among others, drawn from the assessment rubric, must be borne in mind:
SUGGESTED APPROACH TO MARKING
SECTION A: ESSAY
Refer to SECTION A: Rubric for Assessing an Essay found on pages 7 and 8 of these marking guidelines.
CRITERIA USED FOR ASSESSMENT | |
CRITERIA | MARKS |
Content and planning (60%) | 30 |
Language, style and editing (30%) | 15 |
Structure (10%) | 5 |
TOTAL | 50 |
SECTION B: TRANSACTIONAL TEXTS
Refer to SECTION B: Rubric for Assessing Transactional Texts found on page 9 of these marking guidelines.
CRITERIA USED FOR ASSESSMENT | |
CRITERIA | MARKS |
Content, planning and format (60%) | 15 |
Language, style and editing (40%) | 10 |
TOTAL | 25 |
NOTE:
NOTE
|
SECTION A: ESSAY
QUESTION 1
Candidates are required to write ONE essay of 400–450 words (2–2½ pages) on ONE of the given topics. Candidates may write in any genre: narrative, descriptive, reflective, discursive, argumentative, or any combination of these.
1.1 My stumbling blocks became my stepping stones.
1.2 'If I were not African, I wonder whether it would be clear to me that Africa is a place where the people do not need limp gifts of fish but sturdy fishing rods and fair access to the pond.'
– Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
1.3 There is no place for traditional values in modern society.
1.4 The magic of a South African summer
1.5 A mask … a mistake … hilarious!
1.6 NOTE: There must be a clear link between the essay and the picture chosen.
1.6.1 Child and cat
1.6.2 Robot and human hand
1.6.3 The Car
TOTAL SECTION A: 50
SECTION B: TRANSACTIONAL TEXTS
QUESTION 2
Candidates are required to respond to TWO of the topics set. The body of each response should be 180–200 words (20–25 lines) in length. The language, register, style and tone must be appropriate to the context.
2.1 FORMAL SPEECH
2.2 MAGAZINE ARTICLE
2.3 E-MAIL
2.4 DIALOGUE
2.5 LETTER TO THE PRESS
2.6 FORMAL REPORT
TOTAL SECTION B: 50
GRAND TOTAL: 100
NOTE:
ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR ESSAY – HOME LANGUAGE [50 MARKS]
Criteria | Exceptional | Skilful | Moderate | Elementary | Inadequate | |
CONTENT AND (Response and ideas)
|
Upper | 28 - 30 | 22 - 24 | 16 - 18 | 10 - 12 | 4 - 6 |
-Outstanding/Striking response beyond normal expectations -Intelligent, thought-provoking and mature ideas -Exceptionally well organised and coherent, including introduction, body and conclusion | -Very well-crafted response -Fully relevant and interesting ideas with evidence of maturity -Very well organised and coherent, including introduction, body and conclusion | -Satisfactory response -Ideas are reasonably coherent and convincing -Reasonably organised and coherent, including introduction, body and conclusion | -Inconsistently coherent response -Unclear ideas and unoriginal -Little evidence of organisation and coherence | -Totally irrelevant response -Confused and unfocused ideas -Vague and repetitive -Unorganised and incoherent | ||
Lower | 25 - 27 | 19 - 21 | 13 - 15 | 7 - 9 | 0 - 3 | |
-Excellent response but lacks the exceptionally striking qualities of the outstanding essay -Mature and intelligent ideas -Skilfully organised and coherent, including introduction, body and conclusion | -Well-crafted response -Relevant and interesting ideas -Well organised and coherent, including introduction, body and conclusion | -Satisfactory response but some lapses in clarity -Ideas are fairly coherent and convincing -Some degree of organisation and coherence, including introduction, body and conclusion | -Largely irrelevant response -Ideas tend to be disconnected and confusing -Hardly any evidence of organisation and coherence | -No attempt to respond to the topic -Completely irrelevant and inappropriate -Unfocused and muddled | ||
LANGUAGE, STYLE AND EDITING Tone, register, style, vocabulary appropriate to purpose/effect and context; 15 MARKS | Upper Level | 14 - 15 | 11 - 12 | 8 - 9 | 5 - 6 | 0 - 3 |
-Tone, register, style and vocabulary highly appropriate to purpose, audience and context -Exceptionally impressive use of language -Compelling and rhetorically effective in tone -Virtually error-free in grammar and spelling - Very skilfully crafted | -Tone, register, style and vocabulary very appropriate to purpose, audience and context -Language is effective and a consistently appropriate tone is used -Largely error-free in grammar and spelling -Very well crafted | -Tone, register, style and vocabulary appropriate to purpose, audience and context -Appropriate use of language to convey meaning -Tone is appropriate -Rhetorical devices used to enhance content | -Tone, register, style and vocabulary less appropriate to purpose, audience and context -Very basic use of language -Tone and diction are inappropriate -Very limited vocabulary | -Language incomprehensible -Tone, register, style and vocabulary not appropriate to purpose, audience and context -Vocabulary limitations so extreme as to make comprehension impossible | ||
Lower level | 13 | 10 | 7 | 4 | ||
-Language excellent and rhetorically effective in tone -Virtually error-free in grammar and spelling -Skilfully crafted | -Language engaging and generally effective -Appropriate and effective tone -Few errors in grammar and spelling -Well crafted | -Adequate use of language with some inconsistencies -Tone generally appropriate and limited use of rhetorical devices | -Inadequate use of language -Little or no variety in sentences -Exceptionally limited vocabulary | |||
STRUCTURE Features of text; 5 MARKS | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 - 1 | |
-Excellent development of topic -Exceptional detail -Sentences, paragraphs exceptionally well-constructed | -Logical development of details -Coherent -Sentences, paragraphs logical, varied | -Relevant details developed -Sentences, paragraphs well-constructed -Essay still makes sense | -Some valid points -Sentences and paragraphs faulty -Essay still makes some sense | -Necessary points lacking -Sentences and paragraphs faulty -Essay lacks sense | ||
CONTENT, PLANNING AND FORMAT Response and ideas; 15 MARKS | 13 -15 | 10 - 12 | 7 - 9 | 4 - 6 | 0 - 3 | |
-Outstanding response beyond normal expectations -Intelligent and mature ideas -Extensive knowledge of features of the type of text -Writing maintains focus -Coherence in content and ideas -Highly elaborated and all details support the topic -Appropriate and accurate format | -Very good response demonstrating good knowledge of features of the type of text -Maintains focus – no digressions -Coherent in content and ideas, very well elaborated and details support topic -Appropriate format with minor inaccuracies | -Adequate response demonstrating knowledge of features of the type of text -Not completely focused – some digressions -Reasonably coherent in content and ideas -Some details support the topic -Generally appropriate format but with some inaccuracies | -Basic response demonstrating some knowledge of features of the type of text -Some focus but writing digresses -Not always coherent in content and ideas -Few details support the topic -Has vaguely applied necessary rules of format -Some critical oversights | -Response reveals no knowledge of features of the type of text -Meaning is obscure with major digressions -Not coherent in content and ideas -Very few details support the topic -Has not applied necessary rules of format | ||
LANGUAGE, STYLE AND EDITING Tone, register, style, purpose/effect, audience and context; 10 MARKS | 9 - 10 | 7 - 8 | 5 - 6 | 3 - 4 | 0 - 2 | |
-Tone, register, style and vocabulary highly appropriate to purpose, audience and context -Grammatically accurate and well-constructed -Virtually error-free | -Tone, register, style and vocabulary very appropriate to purpose, audience and context -Generally grammatically accurate and well-constructed -Very good vocabulary -Mostly free of errors | -Tone, register, style and vocabulary appropriate to purpose, audience and context -Some grammatical errors -Adequate vocabulary -Errors do not impede meaning | -Tone, register, style and vocabulary less appropriate to purpose, audience and context -Inaccurate grammar with numerous errors -Limited vocabulary -Meaning obscured | -Tone, register, style and vocabulary do not correspond to purpose, audience and context -Error-ridden and confused -Vocabulary not suitable for purpose -Meaning seriously impaired |