INFORMATION FOR THE MARKER

In assessing a candidate's work, the following aspects, among others, drawn from the assessment rubric, must be borne in mind:

  • The overall effect of planning, drafting, proofreading and editing of the work on the final text produced
  • Awareness of writing for a specific purpose, audience and context – as well as register, style and tone – especially in SECTION B
  • Grammar, spelling and punctuation
  • Language structures, including an awareness of critical language
  • Choice of words and idiomatic language
  • Sentence construction
  • Paragraphing
  • Interpretation of the topic that will be reflected in the overall content: the introduction, the development of ideas and the conclusion

SUGGESTED APPROACH TO MARKING
SECTION A: ESSAY

Refer to SECTION A: Rubric for Assessing an Essay found on pages 7 and 8 of these marking guidelines.

CRITERIA USED FOR ASSESSMENT
 CRITERIA  MARKS
 Content and planning (60%)  30
 Language, style and editing (30%)  15
 Structure (10%)  5
 TOTAL  50

 

  1. Read the whole piece and decide on a category for CONTENT AND PLANNING.
  2. Re-read the piece and select the appropriate category for LANGUAGE, STYLE AND EDITING.
  3. Re-read the piece and select the appropriate category for STRUCTURE.

SECTION B: TRANSACTIONAL TEXTS

Refer to SECTION B: Rubric for Assessing Transactional Texts found on page 9 of these marking guidelines.

CRITERIA USED FOR ASSESSMENT
 CRITERIA MARKS
Content, planning and format (60%) 15
Language, style and editing (40%) 10
 TOTAL  25

 

  1. Read the whole piece and decide on a category for CONTENT, PLANNING AND FORMAT.
  2. Re-read the piece and select the appropriate category for LANGUAGE, STYLE AND EDITING.

NOTE:

  • Various formats of transactional/referential/informational texts have been taught/ are in current practice. This has to be considered when assessing the format.
  • Give credit for appropriateness of format.
  • Look for a logical approach in all writing.

 NOTE

  • The points given below each topic in these marking guidelines serve only as a guide to markers
  • Allowance must be made for a candidate's own interpretation of the topic, even if it differs from the given points or a marker's own views or interpretations. 

 

SECTION A: ESSAY
QUESTION 1

Candidates are required to write ONE essay of 400–450 words (2–2½ pages) on ONE of the given topics. Candidates may write in any genre: narrative, descriptive, reflective, discursive, argumentative, or any combination of these.
1.1 My stumbling blocks became my stepping stones.

  • Responses could include circumstances/challenges that the narrator had overcome and that helped him/her to progress.
    [50]

1.2 'If I were not African, I wonder whether it would be clear to me that Africa is a place where the people do not need limp gifts of fish but sturdy fishing rods and fair access to the pond.'

– Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

  • Candidates could address self-reliance as opposed to charity.
  • Focus could be on fair opportunity.
  • The misunderstood African identity could be discussed.
    [50]

1.3 There is no place for traditional values in modern society.

  • Candidates could argue for or against the motion.
  • Candidates could also present a mixed response.
    [50]

1.4 The magic of a South African summer

  • The unique appeal of a South African summer should be explored.
    [50]

1.5 A mask … a mistake … hilarious!

  • Candidates should recount a humorous story/anecdote, relating to a mask.
  • Credit literal/figurative interpretations of the topic. [50]

1.6 NOTE: There must be a clear link between the essay and the picture chosen.
1.6.1 Child and cat

  • Credit literal, figurative and/or mixed responses. [50]

1.6.2 Robot and human hand

  • Credit literal, figurative and/or mixed responses.
    [50]

1.6.3 The Car

  • Credit literal, figurative and/or mixed responses.
    [50]

TOTAL SECTION A: 50

SECTION B: TRANSACTIONAL TEXTS

QUESTION 2
Candidates are required to respond to TWO of the topics set. The body of each response should be 180–200 words (20–25 lines) in length. The language, register, style and tone must be appropriate to the context.

2.1 FORMAL SPEECH

  • The speech could be inspirational/motivational and/or galvanise public support/provide updates.
  •  Register should be appropriate.
    [25]

2.2 MAGAZINE ARTICLE

  • The candidate should appeal to the reader's patriotism and dispel the notion that emigrating is a solution.
  •  Format: headline is essential; by-line is optional
    [25]

2.3 E-MAIL

  • The candidate must motivate the organisation's suitability to be a beneficiary, by focusing on the profile of the organisation/the needs and possibly the management plan designed for the distribution of the personal protective equipment.
  • Format: sender's and recipient's e-mail addresses; subject line; salutation and signing off; appropriate register/tone
    [25]

2.4 DIALOGUE

  • The employee could acquiesce or object to the employer's request.
  • Valid dialogue format should be used.
    [25]

2.5 LETTER TO THE PRESS

  • The candidate should present his/her views on beauty pageants.
  • Format: own address, date, addressee, subject line, salutation and signing-off [25]

2.6 FORMAL REPORT

  • The report should focus on under-utilisation of public libraries.
  • Format: headline; terms of reference; procedure; findings; conclusion; recommendations
    [25]

TOTAL SECTION B: 50
GRAND TOTAL: 100

NOTE:

  • Always use the rubric when marking the creative essay (Paper 3, SECTION A).
  • Marks from 0–50 have been divided into FIVE major level descriptors.
  • In the Content, Language and Style criteria, each of the five level descriptors is divided into an upper-level and a lower level sub-category with the applicable mark range and descriptors.
  • Structure is not affected by the upper-level and lower-level division.

ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR ESSAY – HOME LANGUAGE [50 MARKS]

Criteria   Exceptional Skilful Moderate Elementary Inadequate

CONTENT AND
PLANNING

(Response and ideas)


Organisation of ideas for planning;
Awareness of purpose, audience and context


30 MARKS   

 

 

 

Upper
Level 

 28 - 30  22 - 24  16 - 18  10 - 12  4 - 6 
-Outstanding/Striking response beyond normal expectations
-Intelligent, thought-provoking and mature ideas
-Exceptionally well organised and coherent, including introduction, body and conclusion
-Very well-crafted response
-Fully relevant and interesting ideas with evidence of maturity
-Very well organised and coherent, including introduction, body and conclusion 
-Satisfactory response
-Ideas are reasonably coherent and convincing
-Reasonably organised and coherent, including introduction, body and conclusion 
 -Inconsistently coherent response
-Unclear ideas and unoriginal
-Little evidence of organisation and coherence
 -Totally irrelevant response
-Confused and unfocused ideas
-Vague and repetitive
-Unorganised and incoherent

 

 

Lower
level

 25 - 27 19 - 21  13 - 15  7 - 9  0 - 3 
 -Excellent response but lacks the exceptionally striking qualities of the outstanding essay
-Mature and intelligent ideas
-Skilfully organised and coherent, including introduction, body and conclusion
 -Well-crafted response
-Relevant and interesting ideas
-Well organised and coherent, including introduction, body and conclusion
 -Satisfactory response but some lapses in clarity
-Ideas are fairly coherent and convincing
-Some degree of organisation and coherence, including introduction, body and conclusion
 -Largely irrelevant response
-Ideas tend to be disconnected and confusing
-Hardly any evidence of organisation and coherence
 -No attempt to respond to the topic
-Completely irrelevant and inappropriate
-Unfocused and muddled

LANGUAGE, STYLE AND EDITING

Tone, register, style, vocabulary appropriate to purpose/effect and context;
Word choice;
Language use and conventions, punctuation, grammar, spelling

15 MARKS  

Upper
Level
 14 - 15 11 - 12  8 - 9  5 - 6  0 - 3 
-Tone, register, style and vocabulary highly appropriate to purpose, audience and context
-Exceptionally impressive use of language
-Compelling and rhetorically effective in tone
-Virtually error-free in grammar and spelling
- Very skilfully crafted
-Tone, register, style and vocabulary very appropriate to purpose, audience and context
-Language is effective and a consistently appropriate tone is used
-Largely error-free in grammar and spelling
-Very well crafted
-Tone, register, style and vocabulary appropriate to purpose, audience and context
-Appropriate use of language to convey meaning
-Tone is appropriate
-Rhetorical devices used to enhance content
 -Tone, register, style and vocabulary less appropriate to purpose, audience and context
-Very basic use of language
-Tone and diction are inappropriate
-Very limited vocabulary
 -Language incomprehensible
-Tone, register, style and vocabulary not appropriate to purpose, audience and context
-Vocabulary limitations so extreme as to make comprehension impossible
Lower
level
 13 10   
-Language excellent and rhetorically effective in tone
-Virtually error-free in grammar and spelling
-Skilfully crafted
-Language engaging and generally effective
-Appropriate and effective tone
-Few errors in grammar and spelling
-Well crafted
-Adequate use of language with some inconsistencies
-Tone generally appropriate and limited use of rhetorical devices
-Inadequate use of language
-Little or no variety in sentences
-Exceptionally limited vocabulary
 

STRUCTURE

Features of text;
Paragraph development and sentence
construction

5 MARKS

5 4 3 2 0 - 1
-Excellent development of topic
-Exceptional detail
-Sentences, paragraphs exceptionally well-constructed
-Logical development of details
-Coherent
-Sentences, paragraphs logical, varied
-Relevant details developed
-Sentences, paragraphs well-constructed
-Essay still makes sense
-Some valid points
-Sentences and paragraphs faulty
-Essay still makes some sense
-Necessary points lacking
-Sentences and paragraphs faulty
-Essay lacks sense

CONTENT, PLANNING AND FORMAT

Response and ideas;
Organisation of ideas for planning;
Purpose, audience, features/conventions and context

15 MARKS

13 -15 10 - 12 7 - 9 4 - 6 0 - 3
-Outstanding response beyond normal expectations
-Intelligent and mature ideas
-Extensive knowledge of features of the type of text
-Writing maintains focus
-Coherence in content and ideas
-Highly elaborated and all details support the topic
-Appropriate and accurate format
-Very good response demonstrating good knowledge of features of the type of text
-Maintains focus – no digressions
-Coherent in content and ideas, very well elaborated and details support topic
-Appropriate format with minor inaccuracies
-Adequate response demonstrating knowledge of features of the type of text
-Not completely focused – some digressions
-Reasonably coherent in content and ideas
-Some details support the topic
-Generally appropriate format but with some inaccuracies
-Basic response demonstrating some knowledge of features of the type of text
-Some focus but writing digresses
-Not always coherent in content and ideas
-Few details support the topic
-Has vaguely applied necessary rules of format
-Some critical oversights
-Response reveals no knowledge of features of the type of text
-Meaning is obscure with major digressions
-Not coherent in content and ideas
-Very few details support the topic
-Has not applied necessary rules of format

LANGUAGE, STYLE AND EDITING

Tone, register, style, purpose/effect, audience and context;
Language use and conventions;
Word choice;
Punctuation and spelling

10 MARKS

9 - 10 7 - 8 5 - 6 3 - 4 0 - 2
-Tone, register, style and vocabulary highly appropriate to purpose, audience and context
-Grammatically accurate and well-constructed
-Virtually error-free
-Tone, register, style and vocabulary very appropriate to purpose, audience and context
-Generally grammatically accurate and well-constructed
-Very good vocabulary
-Mostly free of errors
-Tone, register, style and vocabulary appropriate to purpose, audience and context
-Some grammatical errors
-Adequate vocabulary
-Errors do not impede meaning
-Tone, register, style and vocabulary less appropriate to purpose, audience and context
-Inaccurate grammar with numerous errors
-Limited vocabulary
-Meaning obscured
-Tone, register, style and vocabulary do not correspond to purpose, audience and context
-Error-ridden and confused
-Vocabulary not suitable for purpose
-Meaning seriously impaired

   

Last modified on Wednesday, 30 November 2022 13:14