MUSIC
EXAMINATION GUIDELINES
GRADE 12
2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS | Page |
1.INTRODUCTION | 3 |
2. ASSESSMENT IN GRADE 12 2.1 Format of the Music papers 2.2 Practical performance examinations 2.2.1 Organisation 2.2.2 Conduct during the examinations 2.2.3 Standardisation of the examination 2.3 Taxonomy | 4 4 9 9 9 9 10 |
3.FOUNDATIONAL KNOWLEDGE 3.1 Practical component (Topic 1) 3.2 Written examination Paper 1 3.3 Music comprehension Paper 2 | 12 12 12 |
4.QUALITY OF CONTENT, THE USE OF LANGUAGE AND PRESENTATION | 13 |
5.ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 5.1 Technical work Sample of Technical Assessment 5.2 Sight-reading 5.3 Aural Tests Sample of Aural Assessment: For Examiner Sample of Aural Assessment: Answer Sheet for Candidate 5.4 Performance pieces | 14 14 18 19 21 |
6.CONCLUSION | 22 |
1. INTRODUCTION
The Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS) for Engineering Graphics and Design outlines the nature and purpose of the subject Engineering Graphics and Design. This guides the philosophy underlying the teaching and assessment of the subject in Grade 12.
The purpose of these Examination Guidelines is to:
This document deals with the final Grade 12 external examinations. It does not deal in any depth with the School-based Assessment (SBA), Performance Assessment Tasks (PATs) or final external practical examinations as these are clarified in a separate PAT document which is updated annually.
These Examination Guidelines should be read in conjunction with:
The following tables provide an overview of the assessment of Music as a subject:
Topic | Marks |
Practical examinations | |
Topic 1 Music Performance and Improvisation | 150 |
Written examinations | |
Topics 2 and 3 Paper 1 Music Literacy and General Music Knowledge Paper 2 Music Comprehension | 120 30 |
TOTAL MARK | 300 |
Practical Examinations
Marks | |
Technical development (scales and study) or Technical development (two studies) | 10 + 20 = 30 or 15 + 15 = 30 |
Performance pieces | 3 x 30 = 90 |
Sight-Reading | 15 |
Aural tests | 15 |
TOTAL | 30 |
2. ASSESSMENT IN GRADE 12
2.1 Format of the Music papers
MUSIC PAPER 1: MUSIC LITERACY AND GENERAL MUSIC KNOWLEDGE
SECTIONS A, B and C/D/E (120 MARKS)
SECTION A: MUSIC LITERACY (60 MARKS) - Compulsory
Question 1: Theory of Music (15 marks)
Question 2: Composition (15 marks)
Question 3: Harmonic Analysis (15 marks)
Question 4: Harmonisation (15 marks)
SECTION B: GENERAL MUSIC KNOWLEDGE (10 MARKS) - Compulsory
Question 5: South African Music Industry (10 marks)
SECTION C: INDIGENOUS AFRICAN MUSIC (50 MARKS) – Chosen Stream
Note the following important aspects:
The section will have the following types of questions on the given descriptions:
Short questions (20 marks)
Paragraphs/Comparisons/Brief notes/Tables etc. (15 marks)
Essay (15 marks)
OR
SECTION D: JAZZ (50 MARKS) – Chosen Stream
Note the following important aspects:
Short questions (20 marks)
Paragraphs/Comparisons/Brief notes/Tables etc. (15 marks)
Essay (15 marks)
OR
SECTION E: WESTERN ART MUSIC (50 MARKS) – Chosen Stream
Note the following important aspects:
Short questions (20 marks)
Paragraphs/Comparisons/Brief notes/Tables etc. (15 marks)
Essay (15 marks)
MUSIC PAPER 2: MUSIC COMPREHENSION
SECTIONS A, B AND C (30 MARKS)
SECTION A: AURAL RECOGNITION (10 MARKS) - Compulsory
The following types of questions may be asked:
SECTION B: RECOGNITION OF CONCEPTS (12 MARKS) – Chosen Stream
There will be choice questions for the IAM, JAZZ and WAM streams:
SECTION C: FORM ANALYSIS (8 MARKS) - Compulsory
2.2 Practical Performance Examinations
2.2.1 Organisation
2.2.2 Conduct during the examinations
2.2.3 Standardisation of the examinations
Teachers must ensure that the standard of the chosen repertoire is at an acceptable level. Level descriptors can be found on page 11 paragraph 2.6 of the CAPS document. Any uncertainties about the required standard should be followed up with the provincial subject advisor at the beginning of the Grade 12 year. Presenting pieces below this standard will result in proportional penalisation calculated as follows:
Intermediate Level (Higher) | Grade IV | Mark × 4/5 |
Intermediate Level (Lower) | Grade III | Mark × 3/5 |
Elementary Level (Higher) | Grade II | Mark × 2/5 |
Elementary Level (Lower) | Grade I | Mark × 1/5 |
2.3 Taxonomy
30% | Low-level questions (Levels 1 and 2) |
40% | Medium-level questions (Levels 3 and 4) |
30% | High-level questions (Levels 5 and 6) |
The table below gives an indication of the different levels at which questions may be set.
Knowledge | Comprehension | Application | Analysis | Evaluation | Creation |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 5 | Level 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE: The level of difficulty of questions will not be determined by the verb used – rather by the context of the question/content asked.
GUIDELINES FOR USING VERBS WHEN SETTING A QUESTION
Level 1
List | State in the briefest form, e.g. Name two maskandi artists/performers |
Name | Label something, e.g. Name the composer of the Pastoral Symphony |
Identify | Single out an item hidden among other information, e.g. Identify the type of non-chordal note |
Describe | Give a brief account of something, e.g. Describe the instruments used in a performance of Pata Pata by Miriam Makeba |
Define | Give the exact meaning of a term or concept, e.g. Define an overture |
Level 2
Explain | Make something clear, e.g. Explain what maskandi is in your own words |
Summarise | Give a shortened version of essential facts, e.g. Write a short summary of the story line of the Magic Flute |
Outline | Give the bare essentials, e.g. Give an outline of the history of Cape jazz |
Do | Follow an instruction, e.g. Write down the major scale which has four sharps |
Level 3
Compare/ Contrast | Show how concepts/styles/works are alike or different, e.g. |
Use | Utilise information in order to clarify meaning, e.g. Use the following list of elements to write a paragraph on the style characteristics of Mozart |
Apply | Use knowledge and understanding to clarify, e.g. Rewrite the following melody in the relative minor key |
Level 4
Discriminate | Tell the difference between concepts, e.g. Show the difference between the exposition and the recapitulation in the sonata |
Distinguish | Identify the characteristics which indicate difference, e.g. What is the difference between a programme symphony and a symphonic poem? |
Critique | Give an opinion on solid factual grounds, e.g. How do the characteristics of African jazz manifest in this piece? |
Analyse | Break down into constituent parts to be able to understand, e.g. Analyse the form of the following song/aria |
Figure chords | Describe chords and progression, e.g. Provide figuring for the chords in bars 5 and 6 by writing the key, chord and position (inversion) |
Level 5
Assess | Make a statement on the quality, e.g. Assess the stylistic accuracy of the following jazz solo |
Examine | Make an in-depth study of a certain aspect, e.g. How does the texture of this composition vary between bars 12 and 20? |
Debate | Write about something from more than one perspective, e.g. Debate, in your own words, if Beethoven can be considered a Classical or Romantic composer |
Level 6
Compose | Create new music, e.g. Compose a melody using the given opening |
Harmonisation | Harmonise or write an accompaniment for a given melody, e.g. Write an accompaniment for the following piano melody |
Opinion | Give a substantiated view of a work or performance, e.g. Give two reasons why you regard this performance as aesthetically pleasing or not |
3. FOUNDATIONAL KNOWLEDGE
3.1 Practical (Topic 1)
The prior knowledge acquired and skills developed up to Grade 12 are absolutely essential for the successful presentation of Music as a subject in the final year of study.
Candidates cannot start with Music as a subject in Grade 12 unless they have already acquired the required practical performance skills.
3.2 Written Examination: Paper 1 (Topic 2 and Topic 3)
Music Literacy (Topic 2), by its very nature, is accumulative in the FET phase. Therefore, the content of the Music Literacy section of the paper will include foundational knowledge.
General Music Knowledge (Topic 3) includes the study of the music industry which is compulsory for all three streams. The specific questions of the three streams (IAM, JAZZ, WAM) will be asked from the Grade 12 content. It is important, however, that candidates have a general knowledge of the basic elements of music, styles of music, instruments and form.
3.3 Music Comprehension: Paper 2
All skills and application of knowledge acquired in Grades 10 and 11 will be assessed together with the new content knowledge acquired in Grade 12.
4. QUALITY OF CONTENT, THE USE OF LANGUAGE AND PRESENTATION
Presentation
Types of answers in General Music Knowledge
5. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
The assessment criteria for technical work, sight-reading and performance pieces are provided below.
5.1 Technical assessment
OPTION 1: WESTERN INSTRUMENTS
Candidates must prepare all the scales and arpeggios of a recognised examination body's list. Examiners will choose scales and arpeggios according to the list below.
SCALES AND ARPEGGIOS
(2 MARKS EACH)
Scales and Arpeggios
1. Major scale: ___________________
2. Minor scale: ___________________
3. Chromatic scale: ___________________
4. Major arpeggio: ___________________
5. Minor arpeggio: ___________________
TOTAL _______________
10
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA OF TECHNICAL WORK
5 x 2 = 10
2 | Fluent, accurate and even with a competent technical facility High quality of tone and secure intonation Prompt response |
1½ | Technically secure with occasional errors resulting from stress Quality of tone and intonation mostly reliable Generally prompt responses |
1 | Mostly fluent but some unevenness of technique Some degree of variety in quality of tone and intonation Hesitant and uncertain responses with occasional restarts |
½ | Limited knowledge of the structure with frequent errors in notes and technically incompetent Poor tone quality and intonation Frequent restarts and little concept of key |
0 | No sense of fluency Many serious errors No sense of structure |
The assessment criteria for the study are on page 16.
TECHNICAL WORK | ||
MAXIMUM MARK | MARK AWARDED | |
SCALES AND ARPEGGIOS | 10 | |
STUDY | 20 | |
TOTAL | 30 |
TWO studies may replace the Scales/Technical exercises and ONE study.
OPTION 2: VOICE AND PERCUSSION/IAM INSTRUMENTS
VOICE: TWO STUDIES | ||
MAXIMUM MARK | MARK AWARDED | |
STUDY 1 | 15 | |
STUDY 2 | 15 | |
TOTAL | 30 |
OR
PERCUSSION/AFRICAN INSTRUMENTS | ||
MAXIMUM MARK | MARK AWARDED | |
STUDY 1 | 15 | |
STUDY 2 | 15 | |
TOTAL | 30 |
OR
OPTION 3: VOICE AND PERCUSSION/AFRICAN INSTRUMENTS
VOICE AND PERCUSSION/AFRICAN INSTRUMENTS
(2 MARKS EACH)
Scales/Arpeggios/Rudiments/Exercises
1. ___________________
2. ___________________
3. ___________________
4. ___________________
5. ___________________
TOTAL _______________
10
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA OF TECHNICAL WORK
5 x 2 = 10
2 | Fluent, accurate and even with a competent technical facility High quality of tone and secure intonation Prompt response |
1½ | Technically secure with occasional errors resulting from stress Quality of tone and intonation mostly reliable Generally prompt responses |
1 | Mostly fluent but some unevenness of technique Some degree of variety in quality of tone and intonation Hesitant and uncertain responses with occasional restarts |
½ | Limited knowledge of the structure with frequent errors in notes and technically incompetent Poor tone quality and intonation Frequent restarts and little concept of key |
0 | No sense of fluency Many serious errors No sense of structure |
The assessment criteria for the study are on page 16.
TECHNICAL WORK | ||
MAXIMUM MARK | MARK AWARDED | |
SCALES AND ARPEGGIOS | 10 | |
STUDY | 20 | |
TOTAL | 30 |
TWO studies may replace the Scales/Technical exercises and ONE study.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR STUDY
FLUENCY; ACCURACY 20 | STYLISTIC SENSE 20 | GENERAL 20 |
(18–20) EXCELLENT Accurate, fluent and precise playing | (18–20) EXCELLENT Clear understanding of the required style | (18–20) EXCELLENT Excellent tone production, touch, intonation, technical competence and suitable tempo |
(14–17) GOOD Mainly accurate and fluent playing | (14–17) GOOD Good sense of performance in appropriate style | (14–17) GOOD Good tone production, touch, intonation, technical competence and tempo |
(10–13) AVERAGE Essentially accurate with adequate fluency | (10–13) AVERAGE A fair sense of the required style | (10–13) AVERAGE Fair tone production, touch, intonation, technical competence and tempo |
(6–9) ACCEPTABLE Tentative tempo, pulse often not clear, frequent hesitations; limited level of accuracy | (6–9) ACCEPTABLE Performance shaky and lacking a sense of style | (6–9) ACCEPTABLE Some idea of tone production, touch, intonation, technical competence and tempo |
(0-5) UNACCEPTABLE Very poor continuity with frequent stumbles, restarts and/or stoppages; very little accuracy; many errors | (0-5) UNACCEPTABLE Style just vaguely discernible | (0-5) UNACCEPTABLE Lacking tone production, touch, intonation, technical competence and tempo |
60 marks ÷ 3 = 20 marks (Options 1 and 3) OR 60 marks ÷ 4 = 15 marks (Option 2) |
5.2 Sight-reading
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR SIGHT-READING
STYLE AND INTERPRETATION 5 | ACCURACY 5 | FLUENCY 5 |
(5) EXCELLENT Musically persuasive, convincing shaping of phrases, artful articulation and dynamics | (5) EXCELLENT Accurate reading of notes and rests | (5) EXCELLENT Consistent and suitable tempo, fluent performance |
(4) GOOD Some understanding of phrasing, articulation and dynamics | (4) GOOD Mostly accurate reading of notes and rests, | (4) GOOD Tempo largely maintained |
(3) ACCEPTABLE Satisfactory control of some aspects of musical style | (3) ACCEPTABLE Acceptable level of accuracy in reading of notes and rests | (3) ACCEPTABLE Acceptable tempo, although somewhat slow, fluency acceptable |
(2) WEAK Little attention to details of musical interpretation | (2) WEAK Mostly inaccurate reading of notes and rests | (2) WEAK Inconsistent tempo, far too slow, fluency flawed |
(0–1) UNACCEPTABLE No attention to musical detail | (0–1) UNACCEPTABLE Performance abandoned or curtailed | (0–1) UNACCEPTABLE Static tempo, no fluency |
Total: 15 marks |
5.3 Aural assessment
SAMPLE: AURAL ASSESSMENT
AURAL COMPONENT (15)
QUESTION PAPER FOR EXAMINER ONLY
1. Sight-singing
(Learner may study sight-singing for 30 seconds. Adjust doh if necessary.) (6)
2. Play the music phrase twice. The candidate must clap the rhythm. (6)
3. Singing of triads/chords (3)
TOTAL: 15
SAMPLE: AURAL ASSESSMENT
AURAL COMPONENT (15)
ANSWER SHEET FOR CANDIDATE ONLY
1. Sight-singing
(Learner may study sight-singing for 30 seconds. Adjust doh if necessary.) (6)
Mark:____
2. Clapping the rhythm (6)
Mark:____
3. Singing of triads/chords
3.1 ____________________
3.2 ____________________
(3)
Mark: ____
TOTAL: 15
5.4 Performance Pieces
IAM | JAZZ | WAM |
Piece 1 Own choice (solo piece/ improvisation/ensemble) (30) | Piece 1 Own choice (solo piece/ improvisation/ensemble) (30) | Piece 1 Own choice (solo piece) (30) |
Piece 2 Own choice (solo piece/ensemble) (30) | Piece 2 Own choice (solo piece/ensemble) (30) | Piece 2 Own choice (solo piece/ensemble) (30) |
Piece 3 Ensemble (30) | Piece 3 Ensemble (30) | Piece 3 Ensemble (30) |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR PREPARED PIECES AND ENSEMBLE
FLUENCY; ACCURACY 20 | STYLISTIC SENSE 20 | GENERAL 20 |
(18–20) EXCELLENT Accurate, fluent and precise playing | (18–20) EXCELLENT Clear understanding of the required style | (18–20) EXCELLENT Excellent tone production, touch, intonation, technical competence and suitable tempo |
(14–17) GOOD Mainly accurate and fluent playing | (14–17) GOOD Good sense of performance in appropriate style | (14–17) GOOD Good tone production, touch, intonation, technical competence and tempo |
(10–13) AVERAGE Essentially accurate with adequate fluency | (10–13) AVERAGE A fair sense of the required style | (10–13) AVERAGE Fair tone production, touch, intonation, technical competence and tempo |
(6–9) ACCEPTABLE Tentative tempo, pulse often not clear, frequent hesitations; limited level of accuracy | (6–9) ACCEPTABLE Performance shaky and lacking a sense of style | (6–9) ACCEPTABLE Some idea of tone production, touch, intonation, technical competence and tempo |
(0-5) UNACCEPTABLE Very poor continuity with frequent stumbles, restarts and/or stoppages; very little accuracy; many errors | (0-5) UNACCEPTABLE Style just vaguely discernible | (0-5) UNACCEPTABLE Lacking tone production, touch, intonation, technical competence and tempo |
60 marks for each piece ÷ 2 = 30 marks per piece x 3 = 90 marks |
6. CONCLUSION
This Examination Guidelines document is meant to articulate the assessment aspirations espoused in the CAPS document. It is therefore not a substitute for the CAPS document and educators should teach to the entire CAPS document.
Qualitative curriculum coverage as enunciated in the CAPS cannot be over-emphasised.