HISTORY PAPER 2 GRADE 12 NATIONAL SENIOR CERTIFICATE MEMORANDUM JUNE 2017
1. SOURCE BASED QUESTIONS 1.1 The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-based questions:
COGNITIVE LEVELS
HISTORICAL SKILLS
WEIGHTING OF QUESTIONS
LEVEL 1 (L1)
Extract evidence from sources
Selection and organisation of relevant information from sources
Define historical concepts/terms
30% (15)
LEVEL 2 (L2)
Interpretation of evidence from sources
Explain information gathered from sources
Analyse evidence from sources
40% (20)
LEVEL 3 (L3)
Interpret and evaluate evidence from the sources
Engage with sources to determine its usefulness, reliability, bias and limitations
Compare and contrast interpretations and perspectives presented in sources and draw independent conclusions
30% (15)
1.2 The following information below indicates how to source-based questions are assessed:
In the marking of source-based questions, credit needs to be given to any other valid and relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or examples.
In the allocation of marks, emphasis should be placed on how the requirements of the question have been addressed.
In the marking guideline, the requirements of the question (skills that need to be addressed) as well as the level of the question are indicated in italics.
1.3 Assessment procedures for source-based questions
Use a tick (✓) for each correct answer.
Pay attention to the mark scheme e.g. (2 x 2) which translates to two reasons and is given two marks each (✓✓✓✓); (1 x 2) which translates to one reason and is given two marks (✓✓).
If a question carries 4 marks then indicate by placing 4 ticks (✓✓✓✓).
Paragraph question Paragraphs are to be assessed globally (holistically). Both the content and structure of the paragraph must be taken into account when awarding a mark. The following steps must be used when assessing a response to a paragraph question:
Read the paragraph and place a bullet (.) at each point within the text where the candidate has used relevant evidence to address the question.
Re-read the paragraph to evaluate the extent to which the candidate has been able to use relevant evidence to write a paragraph.
At the end of the paragraph indicate the ticks (√) that the candidate has been awarded for the paragraph; as well as the level (1,2, or 3) as indicated in the holistic rubric and a brief comment e.g. ___________ . __________________________ . _________________________ _____________________________________________ . _________________ √√√√√ Level 2 Used mostly relevant evidence to write a basic paragraph
Count all the ticks for the source-based question and then write the mark on the bottom margin to the right, e.g. 32 50
Ensure that the total mark is transferred accurately to the front/back cover of the answer script.
2. ESSAY QUESTIONS 2.1 The essay questions require candidates to:
Be able to structure their argument in a logical and coherent manner. They need to select, organise and connect the relevant information so that they are able to present a reasonable sequence of facts or an effective argument to answer the question posed. It is essential that an essay has an introduction, a coherent and balanced body of evidence and a conclusion.
2.2 Marking of essays questions
Markers must be aware that the content of the answer will be guided by the textbooks in use at the particular centre.
Candidates may have any other relevant introduction and/or conclusion than those included in a specific essay marking guideline for a specific essay.
When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should be credited for any other relevant answer.
2.3 Global assessment of the essay The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires the teacher to score the overall product as a whole, without scoring the component parts separately. This approach encourages the learner to offer an individual opinion by using selected factual evidence to support an argument. The learners will not be required to simply regurgitate ‘facts’ in order to achieve a high mark. This approach discourages learners from preparing ‘model’ answers and reproducing them without taking into account the specific requirements of the question. Holistic marking of the essay credits learners’ opinion supported by evidence. Holistic assessment, unlike content-based marking, does not penalise language inadequacies as the emphasis is on the following:
The construction of argument
The appropriate selection of factual evidence to support such argument
The learner’s interpretation of the question
2.4 Assessment procedures of the essay 2.4.1 Keep the synopsis in mind when assessing essays. 2.4.2 During the first reading of the extended writing, ticks need to be awarded for a relevant introduction (indicated by a bullet in memorandum) each of the main points/aspects that is properly contextualised (also indicated by bullets in the memorandum) and a relevant conclusion (indicated by a bullet in the memorandum) e.g. in an answer where there are 5 main points there will be 7 ticks. 2.4.3 The following additional symbols can also be used:
Introduction, main aspects and conclusion not properly contextualised ^
Wrong statement
Irrelevant statement
Repetition R
Analysis A√
Interpretation I√
2.5 The Matrix 2.5.1 Use of analytical matrix in the marking of essay In the marking of essays, with reference to page 5, the given criteria shown in the matrix should be used. In assessing the extended writing note should be taken of both the content and presentation. At the point of intersection of the content and presentation based on the seven competency levels, a mark should be awarded.
The first reading of essay will be to determine to what extent the main aspects have been covered and to allocate the content level (on the matrix).
C
LEVEL
4
The second reading of essay will relate to the level (on the matrix) of presentation.
C
LEVEL 4
P
LEVEL 5
Allocate an overall mark with the use of the matrix.
C
LEVEL 4
30-33
P
LEVEL 5
MARKING MATRIX FOR ESSAY: TOTAL MARKS: 50
PRESENTATION
CONTENT
LEVEL 7 Very well planned and structured essay. Good synthesis of information. Developed an original, well balanced and independent line of argument with the use of evidence and sustained and defended the argument throughout. Independent conclusion is drawn from evidence to support the line of argument.
LEVEL 6 Very well planned and structured essay. Developed a relevant line of argument. Evidence used to defend the argument. Attempts to draw an independent conclusion from the evidence to support the line of argument.
LEVEL 5 Well planned and structured essay. Attempts to develop a clear argument. Conclusion drawn from the evidence to support the line of argument.
LEVEL 4 Planned and constructed an argument. Evidence used to some extent to support the line of argument. Conclusions reached based on evidence.
LEVEL 3 Shows some evidence of a planned and constructed argument. Attempts to sustain a line of argument. Conclusions not clearly supported by evidence.
LEVEL 2 Attempts to structure an answer. Largely descriptive or some attempt at developing a line of argument. No attempt to draw a conclusion.
LEVEL 1 Little or no attempt to structure the essay.
LEVEL 7 Question has been fully answered. Content selection fully relevant to line of argument.
47-50
43-46
LEVEL 6 Question has been answered. Content selection relevant to a line of argument.
43-46
40-42
38-39
LEVEL 5 Question answered to a great extent. Content adequately covered and relevant.
38-39
36-37
34-35
30-33
28-29
LEVEL 4 Question recognisable in answer. Some omissions or irrelevant content selection.
30-33
28-29
20-23
LEVEL 3 Content selection does not relate to the question, but does not answer it, or does not always relate to the question. Omissions in coverage.
LEVEL 1 Question inadequately addressed or not at all. Inadequate or irrelevant content.
14-17
0-13
SECTION A: SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS QUESTION 1 WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE BLACK CONSCIOUSNESS MOVEMENT AND THE SOWETO UPRISING ON THE ANC? 1.1 1.1.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
English
Afrikaans (2 × 1) (2)
1.1.2 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2] 60 minutes (1 × 2) (2) 1.1.3 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
Keep Black illiterate
Prepare them for servitude
To ensure constant supply of cheap labour for white owned industries Any other relevant response. (Any 2 × 2) (4)
1.1.4 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
State
Church (2 × 1)(2)
1.1.5 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
Not a word is mentioned of the contribution made by the Africans towards these institutions and towards the development of the country generally. (1 × 2) (2)
1.1.6 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1A – L2]
No
The economy was largely dependent on cheap black labour
The mining industry was largely dependent on cheap black labour
The mining industry led to the industrialization of South Africa Any other relevant response. (Any 2 × 2) (4)
1.2 1.2.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1] Bantu Education (1 × 2) (2) 1.2.2 [Comparison of information in Sources 1A and 1B – L3]
Source 1A states that Bantu Education was designed to domesticate blacks that is why subjects like gardening, soil conservation (Source 1A) was introduced.
Source 1B states that Bantu Education was designed to supply labour to white industries that that is why subjects like gardening, soil conservation (Source 1A) was introduced.
Both sources show that Blacks were deprived of proper mathematics (Source 1A) which limited their career opportunities and forced them to become domesticated (Source 1B). Any other relevant response. (Any 2 × 2) (4)
1.2.3 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1B – L1]
SASO
SSSM (2 × 1) (2)
1.2.4 [Determining justification within Source 1B – L3] Justified
Blacks were seen as inferior race and treated accordingly.
Blacks were denied any political rights.
Blacks were denied any economic rights – seen as source of cheap black labour.
Blacks were separated from other races and were provided with poor facilities and poor education. Any other relevant response. (Any 2 × 2) (4)
1.3 1.3.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1] ANC (1 × 2) (2) 1.3.2 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
ANC was the oldest/first party that was established to formally oppose apartheid
Most prominent leaders of the Soweto Uprisings were members of the banned ANC
BC supported and spread the ideas of the ANC in exile
ANC worked underground to influence the youth of SA
ANC internationally recognized as the official mouthpiece of the oppressed in SA Any other relevant response. (Any 2 × 2) (4)
1.4 1.4.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1D – L1]
To forge pride and unity amongst the masses of our people
To forge confidence in their ability to throw off their oppression. (Any 2 × 1) (2)
1.4.2 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
BC and the ANC shared the same ideology
BC members became members or were members of the banned ANC Any other relevant response. (Any 2 × 2) (4)
1.4.3 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1C – L2]
Opposition against Apartheid was very weak (feint) after the imprisonment of the leadership during the Rivonia Trial.
Opposition to Apartheid was weak because the NP government imprisoned, banned or exiled political freedom fighters. Any other relevant response. (Any 1 × 2) (2)
1.5 [Interpretation, analysis and synthesis of evidence from all relevant sources – L3]
ANC established to fight for equality of Blacks (Source 1C)
Blacks received inferior education (Source 1A)
Inferior educations aims to supply white industries with cheap black labour (Source 1B)
BC challenged poor education system through SASO and SASM (Source 1B)
BC challenged racism, oppression and exploitation – same ideals of the ANC (Source 1B)
BC planned by ANC in exile (Source 1C)
BC members who were exiled or banned joined the ANC in exile (Source 1C)
ANC welcomed BC as a genuine force of revolution (Source 1C)
BC radically changed the consciousness of the oppressed people to a mind-set of liberation (Source 1D)
ANC was banned in the 1960s – pulse of our people had been rendered faint by banning, imprisonment, exile, murder and banishment” but was kept alive by the BCM (Source 1D) Any other relevant response.
Use the following rubric to allocate marks
LEVEL 1
Uses evidence in an elementary manner e.g. shows no or little understanding of how the Black Consciousness Movement and the Soweto Uprising galvanised Blacks towards the aims of the ANC.
Uses evidence partially to report on topic or cannot report on topic.
MARKS 0–2
LEVEL 2
Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great extent to the topic e.g. shows an understanding of how the Black Consciousness Movement and the Soweto Uprising galvanized Blacks towards the aims of the ANC.
Uses evidence in a basic manner.
MARKS 3–5
LEVEL 3
Uses relevant evidence e.g. shows a thorough understanding of how the Black Consciousness Movement and the Soweto Uprising galvanized Blacks towards the aims of the ANC.
Evidence relates well to the topic
Uses evidence very effectively in an organised paragraph that shows understanding of the topic.
MARKS 6–8
(8) [50]
QUESTION 2: HOW DID THE DIFFERENT POLITICAL PARTIES RESPOND TO THE IDEALS OF THE TRC? 2.1 2.1.1 [Own knowledge – L1] Human rights abuses that happened during Apartheid (1 × 2) (2) 2.1.2 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
South Africa's peaceful transition to democracy
The truth and reconciliation process as a new way of living for humankind. (2 × 1) (2)
2.1.3 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2] Many victims were not paid the R30 000 reparations. Any other relevant response. (1 × 2) (2) 2.1.4 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
To find the truth of what happened in the past
To contribute towards nation building and reconciliation
Perpetrators to come forward and disclose the whole truth
Perpetrators to be given amnesty if they had political motives
Victims to forgive perpetrators Any other relevant response. (Any 2 × 2) (4)
2.1.5 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2A – L2]
He referred to those whites who committed political crimes but refused to apply for amnesty which could have contributed positively towards nation building and reconciliation
He referred to the NP leadership who refused to testify – this had a negative impact on the reconciliation proses Any other relevant response. (Any 2 × 2) (4)
2.1.6 [Engaging with the content of Source 2A to determine bias – L3]
The White people were badly let down by their NP leadership.
Many of them carry a burden of a guilt which would have been lessened had they actively embraced the opportunities offered by the Commission
The denial by so many white South Africans that they even benefited from apartheid is a crippling, self-inflicted blow to their capacity to enjoy and appropriate the fruits of change. (Any 2 × 2) (4)
2.2 2.2.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
Numerous atrocities (killings) of the past have not been properly investigated
There was an over-emphasis on the role of the former security forces
The assassination of about 400 top IFP leaders has not been thoroughly probed
There has not been an in-depth analysis of what many would call 'black-on-black' violence. (4 × 1) (4)
2.2.2 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
He believed that the TRC was established to prosecute all white NP officials who were in one way or the other involved in political killings during Apartheid
He believed the ANC wanted to use the TRC as a vehicle to prosecute whites
He did not believe in the ideals of the TRC
He wanted to focus on nation building
He wanted to focus on reconciliation and not on seeking justice Any other relevant response. (Any 1 × 2) (2)
2.2.3 [Definition of historical concepts from Source 2B – L1]
Emerging democracy Country that recently gained their independence and needs to grow in democratic rule. (1 × 2)(2)
Amnesty Official pardon for those who committed political crimes during Apartheid. (1 × 2)(2)
2.3 2.3.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1] IFP (1 × 1)(1) 2.3.2[Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1] During the 1980s, the South African Defence Force trained and armed an offensive parliamentary unit of the IFP. (1 × 1)(1) 2.3.3[Interpretation of evidence from Source 2B – L2]
They allowed themselves to be used by the NP to commit Black on Black violence
They refused to participate during the process of negotiations
They wanted their own independent state which was in line with the NP’s policy of separate development Any other relevant response. (Any 2 × 2) (4)
2.3.4 [Comparison of information in Sources 2A and 2C – L3]
Source 2A states that the TRC failed because of NP failed to come forward whereas Source 2C states that the Inkhata Party was responsible for the second largest amount of human rights violations
Source 2A states that the Whites could not enjoy and appropriate the fruits of change whereas Source 2C states that TRC failed to summons the head of the IFP because of a fear of generation violence in the volatile (unstable) Kwa-Zulu Natal region Any other relevant response. (2 × 2) (4)
2.4 2.4.1 [Engaging with the content of Source 2D to determine bias – L3]
There are members of the ANC killing our people.
It is members of the army, members of the police force and members of the intelligence service who are also behind this violence
People who participate in this violence for whatever reason – kill innocent people just because others have killed innocent people – these ‘freedom fighters’ – are not serving the cause of freedom. (Any 2 × 2) (4)
2.5 [Interpretation, analysis and synthesis of evidence from all relevant sources – L3]
ANC blamed the whites for not coming forward (Source 2A)
Whites failed to take advantage of the TRC by refusing to testify (Source 2A).
De Klerk was critical of the TRC for alleging that he was responsible for human rights violations while he was president – he said he did not know of these crimes (Source 2B)
NP believed that TRC was not the way to go but rather Ubuntu (Source 2B)
Other leading figures of the Apartheid regime also escaped the net of the TRC because few of them testified but none was punished
Atrocities committed by the IFP/Zulus were largely ignored (Source 2C)
Zulu leaders refused to testify
Some members of the ANC were critical of the TRC and saw it as an attempt to criminalize the liberation struggle
NP feared that the TRC would be used as a political weapon against its opponents by a dominant ANC bent on retribution.
Both the NP and IFP also criticised the appointment of many Commissioners, including the Chairperson, Archbishop Tutu, who was seen, especially by the IFP as staunchly pro-ANC, and the vice-Chairperson, Alex Boraine, with whom the NP had a history of altercation. Any other relevant response.
Use the following rubric to allocate marks:
LEVEL 1
Uses evidence in an elementary manner e.g. shows no or little understanding of how the different political parties responded to the ideals of the TRC.
Uses evidence partially to report on topic or cannot report on topic.
MARKS 0–2
LEVEL 2
Evidence is mostly relevant and relates to a great extent to the topic e.g. shows an understanding of how the different political parties responded to the ideals of the TRC.
Uses evidence in a basic manner.
MARKS 3–5
LEVEL 3
Uses relevant evidence e.g. shows a thorough understanding of how the different political parties responded to the ideals of the TRC.
Evidence relates well to the topic
Uses evidence very effectively in an organized paragraph that shows understanding of the topic.
MARKS 6–8
(8) [50]
SECTION B QUESTION 3: CIVIL RESISTANCE, 1970s TO 1980s: SOUTH AFRICA: THE CRISIS OF APARTHEID IN THE 1980s “The contributions of the Anti-Apartheid Movements was the final nail in the coffin of the Apartheid government.” Do you agree with this statement? Substantiate your answer with relevant historical evidence. SYNOPSIS Candidates must indicate whether they agree with the statement or not and supply a short reasons to substantiate their point of view. ELABORATION
The Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) in Britain aimed to end Apartheid through boycotts and isolating SA from the international community.
They held demonstrations outside: the SA Embassy in Britain and against companies who did business with SA
The result of this action: Barclays Bank sold their holdings in SA
They held a star-studded concert at Wembley to demand the release of Mandela
IAAM initiated sport, cultural, academic and economic sanctions that isolated SA internationally
Sport Boycotts:
AAM prevented SA from participating in international competitions:
The Gleneagles Agreement called on commonwealth countries to cut all sporting ties with SA
SA was expelled from the International Olympics
Cultural Boycotts:
British and American musicians refused to perform in SA
Academic Boycotts:
SA academics were barred from attending international academic conferences
Consumer Boycotts:
The general public was urged to boycott SA products
Disinvestment
Chase Manhattan Bank cutting its links with SA
The European Economic Community banned new investments in SA in 1985
1986 America banned all new loans and investments in SA
Large companies like General Electric, Pepsi Cola, IBM General Motors and Mobil closed their operations in SA
Sanctions
In 1977 the UN banned the selling of weapons to SA
In 1973 OPEC imposed an oil embargo against SA
The USA refused to buy SA agricultural products, iron and steel
The USA banned direct air travel between the countries
International trade unions called on the Anti-Apartheid movements to boycott SA goods and to support sanction and disinvestment initiatives.
The Frontline states allowed ANC to establish bases and military training camps in their countries.
From here the ANC was able to step up MK raids and intensify the armed struggle.
By the late 1980s the SA economy was on the verge of collapse
Sanctions and disinvestment led to increased unemployment and poverty
This led to increased internal resistance
All this made it very difficult for the NP to survive in power
It was thus the combination of internal and external pressures that would lead to the downfall of Apartheid Any other relevant answer.
CONCLUSION Candidates must tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion. [50]
QUESTION 4: THE COMING OF DEMOCRACY TO SOUTH AFRICA AND COMING TO TERMS WITH THE PAST: NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AND THE GNU “The Sunset clause broke the deadlock between the ANC and the NP and paved the way for the first democratic elections in 1994.” Critically assess this statement with reference to the process of negotiation in South Africa between 1990 and 1994. SYNOPSIS The candidate should focus on the key words in the statement “Sunset clause broke the deadlock” and assess whether they agree or disagree with the statement. ELABORATION
Unbanning of political parties
Release of Mandela
Grootte Schuur-minute
Pretoria-Minute
Codes 1
Whites only referendum
Codesa 2 and outbreak of violence
Boipatong and Bisho massacre
Goldstone commission
Record of Understanding
Sunset clause
Multi-party talks at World Trade Centre
Assassination of Chris Hani
Elections
CONCLUSION Candidates must tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion. [50]
QUESTION 5: THE COLLAPSE OF COMMUNISM AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER To what extent did the collapse of communism influence political developments in South Africa between the years 1989–1990? SYNOPSIS Candidates need to assess to what extent the collapse of communism contributed to the political developments in SA. ELABORATION
Economic conditions in Russia in the late 1980s
Gorbachev’s policy of Glasnost and Perestroika
Gorbachev ends the nuclear arms with the USA
Gorbachev ends the war in Afghanistan
USSR relinquishes her dominance over Eastern Europe
The fall of the Berlin Wall and end of communism
Impact on the ANC – lost the financial and military support of USSR
Impact on the NP – lost support of the West – demanded the end of Apartheid
Battle of Cuito Cuanavale and the independence of Namibia
Change of leadership – De Klerk takes over power
De Klerk willing to negotiate with the ANC
Release of Mandela and establishment of platform for negotiations
CONCLUSION Candidates must tie up their argument with a relevant conclusion. [50]