DRAMATIC ARTS
GRADE 12
NSC PAST PAPERS AND MEMOS
FEBRUARY/MARCH 2018
GENERAL NOTES FOR THE CHIEF MARKER AND MARKERS
1. The purpose of assessment/examination processes is not only to determine the 'remembering' of knowledge taught and learnt at each of the 6 cognitive levels of knowledge, but also to determine the complexity of the thinking process the candidate applies to the knowledge retrieved from memory. The tool to assess these two components is Anderson and Krathwohl's revised Blooms' Taxonomy.
2. The marking guideline discussion forum, before marking commences, cannot sufficiently predict all responses. Provincial markers need to take this into account, be open to candidates' responses and make sure that different teaching styles do not disadvantage the learner/candidate.
3. Spend the first day unpacking the quality and quantity of the evidence in the marking guidelines, standardise required responses and find common definitions and concepts. Assimilate the
4. If the marking guidelines do not give clear guidance, a marker must indicate, with a short comment, why marks were awarded or not.
5. Tick clearly next to the required cognitive level/thinking process of complexity/ concept/content/skills/knowledge aspects required when a mark is awarded. Markers should engage actively with the answer.
6. During the marking process, have regular rounds of consultation to ensure marking is standardised.
7. Where a candidate writes more than the suggested number of words, do not penalise (e.g. essay question).
8. Mark globally where possible. Markers accept any correct, relevant and well motivated answers.
9. Markers must check that candidates' responses align with the Curriculum Assessment Policy Statement's Broad Topics and Topics, Content (concepts, skills and knowledge).
STANDARDISATION OF MARKING ACROSS THE PROVINCES |
Rating of Essay and Response Questions
The chief marker in each province must clarify the paradigm from which the questions and the accompanying marking guidelines were designed and set:
1. Item difficulty:
How complex is the design of the question?
2. Task difficulty:
What is the cognitive level and thinking process required from the candidate?
3. Stimulus difficulty:
How difficult or easy is it to understand and apply the source?
4. Expected response difficulty:
What is the quantity (how much) and quality (how well) of the expected response, required from the candidate, as provided in the marking guidelines? Does it align with the item, task and stimulus?
Are the marks appropriately weighted and allocated?
–Leong: 2002
In the training of markers at the beginning of the marking process, the chief marker in each province should adhere to the following procedure. This will assist with the standardisation of the scoring of candidate's essays and responses for each part of the examination. It will also standardise national marking procedures, processes and results.
Introduction to the Task
Introduction to the Rubric and Anchor Papers
Practise Scoring Individually
INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION
SECTION A: 20th CENTURY THEATRE MOVEMENTS
QUESTION 1
Topic | 12.1: 20th Century 'isms' | |||||
Cognitive level of difficulty | Analysing, evaluating, creating | |||||
Command verbs | Discuss, evaluate, create | |||||
Explanation of command verb | To determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth or condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding. | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Process | Metacognition | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Very Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response Rubric (ECR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 9 | Middle | 12 | High | 9 |
Quality Level | Mark allocation | Quality of evidence |
High End | Score point | The response indicates application of a reasonable strategy that leads to a correct solution in the context of the problem. The procedural representations are correct. The explanation and/or justification is logically sound, clearly presented, fully developed, supports the solution, and does not contain significant conceptual errors. The response demonstrates a complete understanding and analysis of the problem. |
24–30 | ||
Average and Above Average | Score point | The response indicates application of a reasonable strategy that may or may not lead to a correct solution. The use of content/skill is essentially correct. The explanation and/or justification is generally well developed, feasible, and supports the solution. The response demonstrates a clear understanding and analysis of the problem. |
15–23 | ||
Achieved | Score point | The response indicates an incomplete application of a reasonable strategy that may or may not lead to a fit-for-purpose solution. The use of content/skill is fundamentally correct. The explanation and/or justification support the solution and are plausible, although it may not be well developed or complete. The response demonstrates a conceptual understanding and analysis of the problem. |
11–14 | ||
Weak | Score point | The response indicates little or no application of a reasonable strategy. It may or may not have the correct answer. The use of content/skill is incomplete or missing. The explanation and/or justification reveal serious flaws in reasoning. The explanation and/or justification may be incomplete or missing. The response demonstrates a minimal understanding and analysis of the problem. |
1–10 | ||
Not Achieved | Score point | The response is completely incorrect or irrelevant. There may be no response, or the response may state, 'I don't know.' |
0 |
The following content pointers serve as a guide:
The candidate must:
The content of the essay must cover the following:
Markers note:
DESCRIPTOR MARKS | THE CANDIDATE DEMONSTRATES THE FOLLOWING: | |
Outstanding Metacognitive Knowledge Create | 27–30 90–100 A+ | Thinking process: Appraises factual, conceptual, procedural and meta-cognitive knowledge in relation to the question, source and content.
Cognitive level: Demonstrates an ability to create, reorganise, discover, renew, change, improve |
Excellent Metacognitive Knowledge Evaluate | 24–26 80–89 A | Thinking process: Appraises factual, conceptual, procedural and meta-cognitive knowledge in relation to the question, source and content and integrates the demands of the question and source in a differentiated, interpretative and interesting manner
Cognitive level: Demonstrates an ability to judge, critique, recommend, evaluate, propose |
Meritorious Procedural Knowledge Analyse | 21–23 70–79 B | Thinking process: Analyses, distinguishes and explores factual, conceptual and procedural knowledge in relation to the question, source and content. and integrates the demands of the question and source in an differentiated and interpretative manner
Cognitive level: Demonstrates an ability to infer, deconstruct concepts, interrelate, attribute, discover |
Substantial Procedural Knowledge Apply | 18–20 60–69 C | Thinking process: Analyses and distinguishes factual, conceptual and procedural knowledge in relation to the question, source and content. Integrates the demands of the question and source in an organised, differentiated and interpretative manner
Cognitive level: Demonstrates an ability to apply, construct, integrate |
Adequate Conceptual Knowledge Understand | 15–17 50–59 D | Thinking process: Explains, interprets and rephrases factual and conceptual knowledge in relation to the question, source, content and integrates the demands of the question and source in a conventional manner
Cognitive level: Demonstrates an ability to interpret, infer, exemplify, classify, summarise, compare, explain |
Moderate Conceptual Knowledge Understand | 12–14 40–49 E | Thinking process: Explains and interprets factual and conceptual knowledge to the question, source and content. Integrates the demands of the question and source in a differentiated manner
Cognitive level: Demonstrates an ability to interpret, infer, exemplify, classify, summarise, compare, explain, |
Elementary Factual Knowledge Remember | 10–11 30–39 F | Thinking process: Defines and applies knowledge from memory. Integrates the demands in relation to the question and source in an uncomplicated/straight forward/fundamental level within a common manner
Cognitive level: Demonstrates an elementary ability to problem solve, identify, list, relate, define |
Not Achieved Factual Knowledge Remember | 1–9 20–29 G | Thinking process: Remembers and applies knowledge from memory. Attempts to integrate the question and source but demonstrates a limited, to basic ability, to solve the demands of the question and quote
Cognitive level: Demonstrates a limited ability to identify, list, relate, define |
Not Achieved Factual Knowledge Remember | 0 H | Thinking process: Demonstrates no understanding of the question or source, unable to write an essay, provides no examples from the play text or the theatre movement OR
Cognitive level: Presents memorised information and content that does not answer the question |
The following content pointers serve as general information on the theatre movements.
EPIC THEATRE
Intention and purpose:
Techniques: Use of:
Audience response:
THEATRE OF THE ABSURD
Intention and purpose. The Absurdist world:
Characters:
Language and dialogue:
Themes are based on the:
POSTMODERNISM
Intention and purpose. Postmodernism:
Metatheatre/Text:
Performances are:
Rehearsal processes are:
Audience is:
Play texts:
Texts (visual, aural, the human body, etc.):
TOTAL SECTION A: 30
SECTION B: SOUTH AFRICAN THEATRE: 1960–1994
The candidate must answer only ONE question in this section.
QUESTION 2: WOZA ALBERT! BY PERCY MTWA, MBONGENI NGEMA AND BARNEY SIMON
SOURCE B
2.1
Topics | 11.4: South African Theatre: Protest | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Identify | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To recognise a problem, need, facts etc. And to show what it is and that it exists/To prove who or what someone or something | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 0 | Middle | 1 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant answers.
The following is a guide:
Albert:
2.2
Topics | 11.4: South African Theatre: Protest | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more detail or revealing relevant facts or information about it/Give a reason to justify or excuse (an event or action) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant answers which reflect knowledge of the original production of Woza Albert!.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Vocal Skills:
2.3
Topics | 11.4: South African Theatre: Protest | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Analysing | |||||
Command verb | Analyse | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Examine, study something methodically and in detail, typically in order to discover, explain and interpret it | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 1 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant answers which reflect an understanding and analysis of how pre-recorded music might change the impact of the play.
The following is a guide:
Pre-recorded music:
2.4
Topics | 11.4: South African Theatre: Protest | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Motivate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Give a reason, present facts and arguments in support of doing, stating something | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an evaluation of the continued success of Woza Albert!.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Woza Albert! provides audiences with:
2.5.1
Topics | 11.4: South African Theatre: Protest | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Name | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To identify, specify or mention by name | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | High |
Markers accept any relevant answers which display the selection of a different genre, e.g. realism.(1)
2.5.2
Topics | 11.4: South African Theatre: Protest | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Describe | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To give, narrate, relate, tell, describe, express a detailed account of | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 2 | Middle | 0 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant answers which describe a scene from the play, e.g. 'I would select the barber shop scene in which the barber cuts the customers' hair and is interviewed by Skulu.' (2)
2.5.3
Topics | 11.4: South African Theatre: Protest | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more details or revealing relevant facts or information about it/Give reasons to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 2 | Middle | 2 | High | 2 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display creativity and the application of the chosen style of performance as selected in QUESTION 2.5.2 in the staging of their scene.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Genre of performance, e.g. realism might include:
2.6
Topics | 11.4: South African Theatre: Protest | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Analysing | |||||
Command verb | Analyse | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Examine, study something methodically and in detail, typically in order to discover, explain and interpret it | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 2 | Middle | 2 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of all the elements of the final scene to make it a 'thrilling conclusion' and have the ability to inspire solidarity and action.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The final scene:
Action:
Performance style:
2.7
Topics | 11.4: South African Theatre: Protest | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Evaluate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Meta Cognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response (ECR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 3 | Middle | 5 | High | 4 |
Refer to the notes and the rubric in the annexure to guide your marking.
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which reflect understanding, analysing, evaluating, applying and creating, based on the subject matter of the question. Candidates must refer to specific examples from the play text and current events.
The following is a guide:
Exploitation
Poverty
Policing
QUESTION 3: SOPHIATOWN BY THE JUNCTION AVENUE THEATRE COMPANY
3.1.1
Topics | 11.4: South African Theatre: Protest | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Describe | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To give, narrate, relate, tell, express a detailed account of | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 1 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant answers which demonstrate an understanding of appropriate mood.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The mood created by song is :
The effect on the audience is possibly:
3.1.2
Topics | 11.4: South African Theatre: Protest | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Motivate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Provide a reason, present facts and arguments in support of doing, stating something | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which demonstrate an understanding of what the car represents.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The car, as a symbol, represents:
3.1.3
Topics | 10:12: Personal Resource Development, Acting and Performance, Performance text in Context, Theatre Production | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more details or revealing relevant facts or information about it. Give reasons to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 0 | Middle | 1 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which reflect an understanding of the purpose of the song.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The song as a theatrical device:
3.1.4
Topics | 10:12: Personal Resource Development, Acting and Performance, Performance text in Context, Theatre Production | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Applying | |||||
Command verb | Suggest | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Cause, argue, demonstrate, show that (something) exists or is the case. Put forward for consideration. To mention an idea, possible plan, or action for other people to consider. To produce an idea in the mind. | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which reflect the candidates' understanding of the use of a variety of languages in the play. Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The creators decided to use a variety of languages because:
3.1.5
Topics | 11.4: South African Theatre: Protest | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Motivate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Give a reason, present facts and arguments in support of doing, stating something | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 3 | Middle | 3 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers that demonstrate creativity in the staging of the scene.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Message:
Staging:
3.1.6
Topics | 10.4: Scene Study. Physical and Vocal Characterisation | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Analysing | |||||
Command verb | Discuss | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Write about (a topic) in detail, taking into account or considering different issues/ideas/opinions related to it | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 2 | Middle | 2 | High | 2 |
Markers accept any relevant answers which reflect an understanding of the candidate's ability to reflect on the vocal and physical portrayal of a character. Award full marks for:
Candidates must refer to both vocal and physical aspects
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an understanding and analysis of the vocal and physical training/skills required from each actor.
The following is a guide:
Vocal skills:
Physical skills:
Vocal Expression
3.2.1
Topics | 11.5: South African Text | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more details or revealing relevant facts or information about it. Give reasons to justify or excuse (an action or event). | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 3 | Middle | 3 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which demonstrate an understanding of the themes of the play text.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Societal rules or laws preventing the characters from reaching their goals are, e.g.:
Bantu Education Act:
Liquor Act
Group Areas Act
3.2.2
Topics | 11.2: Realist Text | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Evaluate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth, or condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Meta Cognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response (ECR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | Middle | High |
Refer to the notes and the rubric in the annexure to guide your marking.
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers that demonstrate analysis and understanding of the different levels of conflict which reflect the mood and messages of the play.
The following is a guide:
INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT:
Princess and Ruth
Conflict:
Behaviour:
Consequence:
Mamariti benefits financially by Ruth staying with her in the house. Jakes sees Ruth's arrival as an opportunity for him to write a real story that will impact on people's lives and possibly earn him a promotion as a feature writer.
Mingus and Charlie
Conflict:
Behaviour:
Consequence:
INTERNAL CONFLICT:
Jakes and Ruth:
Conflict:
Behaviour:
QUESTION 4: SIENER IN DIE SUBURBS BY PG DU PLESSIS
4.1
Topics | 11.5: South African Text | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Name | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Specify (time, or place) as something desired, suggested, or decided on To identify, specify, or mention by name | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 1 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant answers which demonstrate an understanding of the setting of the play.
Time
Place
4.2
Topics | 11.5: South African Text | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Name | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Specify (time or place) as something desired, suggested, or decided on To identify, specify or mention by name | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity / Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 0 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant answers which demonstrate an understanding of the dramatic structure of the play.
The following is a guide:
Dramatic Structure:
4.3
Topics | 11.2: Play Text 1: Realist Text | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Analysing | |||||
Command verb | Suggest | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Cause, argue, demonstrate, show that (something) exists or is the case/ Put forward for consideration/To mention an idea, possible plan, or action for other people to consider/To produce an idea in the mind | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 0 | Middle | 2 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which reflect an understanding of how the time lapse in the play reflects the realistic nature of the play.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Time and Action:
4.4
Topics | 10.4: Scene Study | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Give | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Give a reason, present facts and arguments in support of doing, stating | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which reflect an understanding of the character of Ma.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Ma:
4.5
Topics | 10.4: Scene Study | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Motivate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Give a reason, present facts and arguments in support of doing, stating something | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers. Acknowledge reasons which reflect knowledge of Ma's character.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Costume
Ma could wear:
4.6
Topics | 10.4: Scene Study | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more detail or revealing relevant facts or information about it/Give a reason to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 2 | Middle | 2 | High | 2 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an understanding of the vocal and physical skills required from each character. Award full marks for:
Vocal Skills:
Physical Skills:
4.7
Topics | 10.4: Scene Study | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Analysing | |||||
Command verb | Discuss | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Write about (a topic) in detail, taking into account or considering different issues or idea or opinions related to it | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Procedural | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 2 | Middle | 2 | High | 2 |
Markers accept any relevant answers which discuss the significance of the 'enkelgarage' to the action of the play.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The 'enkelgarage 'is significant because:
4.8
Topics | 10.4: Scene Study | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Motivate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Give a reason, present facts and arguments in support of doing, stating something | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant answers which reflect the candidates' understanding of the dramatic value of the 'AT YOUR OWN RISK' sign. Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The 'AT YOUR OWN RISK' sign could indicate:
4.9
Topics | 11.2: Realist Text | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Evaluate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth, or condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Meta Cognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response (ECR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 3 | Middle | 5 | High | 4 |
Refer to the notes and the rubric in the annexure to guide your marking.
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which reflect understanding, analysing, evaluating, applying, creating and drawing conclusions around the subject matter of the question.
The following is a guide:
Characters are:
Conflict is:
Dialogue:
TOTAL SECTION B: 40
SECTION C: SOUTH AFRICAN THEATRE: POST-1994 – CONTEMPORARY
The candidate must answer only ONE question in this section.
QUESTION 5: NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH BY JOHN KANI
5.1
Topics | 12.6: South African Contemporary Theatre (post 1994) | |||||
Cognitive level of difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Describe | |||||
Explanation of command verb | To give, narrate, relate, express | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 1 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant answers.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The actor may decide to:
5.2
Topics | 10.12: Staging Conventions | |||||
Cognitive level of difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more detail or revealing relevant facts or information about it/Give a reason to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant answers.
Sipho's entrance might add to the dramatic tension because:
5.3.1
Topics | 10.12: Staging Conventions | |||||
Cognitive level of difficulty | Applying | |||||
Command verb | Suggest | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Cause, argue, demonstrate, show that (something) exists or is the case/ Put forward for consideration/To mention an idea, possible plan, or action for other people to consider/To produce an idea in the mind | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 1 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant answers.
Thando is excited because she:
Thando is confused because she:
5.3.2
Topics | 10.3: South African Theatre | |||||
Cognitive level of difficulty | Applying | |||||
Command verb | Analyse | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Examine, study something methodically, in detail | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an understanding of vocal and physical skills.
Vocal Skills:
Physical Skills:
5.3.3
Topics | 12. 6: South African Contemporary Theatre (post 1994) | |||||
Cognitive level of difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more details or revealing relevant facts or information about it. Give reasons to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 1 | High | 1 |
Mpho's influence on Thando:
5.4
Topics | 10.4: Scene Study | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Analysing | |||||
Command verb | Discuss | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Write about (a topic) in detail, taking into account or considering different issues/ideas/opinions related to it | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Procedural | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any well-motivated answers which reflect an analysis of the conflict between Sipho and Mandisa.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Conflict occurs because:
5.5.1
Topics | 12.5: Prescribed Play Text 2: South African Contemporary Theatre (post 1994) | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Analysing | |||||
Command verb | Discuss | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Write about (a topic) in detail, taking into account or considering different issues/ideas/opinions related to it | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Procedural | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 2 | Middle | 2 | High | 2 |
Markers accept any well-motivated answers which reflect an analysis of Sipho's statement.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
5.5.2
Topics | 12.5: Prescribed Play Text 2: South African Contemporary Theatre (post 1994) | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Describe | |||||
Explanation of command verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more detail or revealing relevant facts or information about it Give reasons to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 1 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any well-motivated answers which reflect an understanding of an authentic vocal expression of Sipho's feelings.
The following is a guide;
Sipho is angry, bitter and hurt and the tone of his voice should reflect this. His tone might communicate:
5.6
Topics | 12.5: Prescribed Play Text 2: South African Contemporary Theatre (post 1994) | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more details or revealing relevant facts or information about it. Give reasons to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any well-motivated answers which reflect an understanding and analysis of Mandisa's sense of humour and point of view about the situation.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The statement is humorous because:
5.7
Topics | 12.5: Prescribed Play Text 2: South African Contemporary Theatre (post 1994) | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Evaluate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth, or condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding. | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Metacognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response (ECR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 3 | Middle | 4 | High | 3 |
Refer to the notes and the rubric in the annexure to guide your marking.
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which reflect understanding, analysis, evaluation, application and draw conclusions around the subject matter of the question. Acknowledge creativity in this answer. The following is a guide:
The realistic nature of the play is supported by:
Language:
Characters:
Staging:
QUESTION 6: GROUNDSWELL BY IAN BRUCE
6.1
Topics | 11.1: Realism and Stanislavsky | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Identify | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To recognise a problem, need, facts etc. and to show what it is and that it exists. To prove who or what someone or something is | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 0 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant answers.
The following is a guide:
The play could be classified as EITHER :
6.2
Topics | 10.3: South African Theatre | ||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Remembering | ||
Command verb | Name | ||
Explanation of Command Verb | Specify (time or place) as something desired, suggested, or decided on To identify, specify or mention by name | ||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | ||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | ||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | ||
Mark allocation | 3 |
A: Thami
B: Smith
C: Johan (3)
6.3
Topics | 10.3: South African Theatre | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more details or revealing relevant facts or information about it. Give reasons to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 3 | Middle | 3 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an understanding and analysis of how costume realistically reflects character, role and situation.
Award 2 marks for each costume.
The following is a guide:
THAMI
Character:
Situation:
Costume:
SMITH
Character:
Situation:
Costume:
JOHAN
Character:
Situation:
Costume
6.4
Topics | 10.3: South African Theatre | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Motivate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Provide a reason, present facts and arguments in support of doing, stating something | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 3 | Middle | 3 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an analysis of how each character's physical and vocal expression might be directed.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
THAMI
Posture:
Dialogue:
SMITH
Posture:
Dialogue:
JOHAN
Posture:
Dialogue:
6.5
Topics | 10.3: South African Theatre | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Analysing | |||||
Command verb | Discuss | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Write about (a topic) in detail, taking into account or considering different issues or idea or opinions related to it | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 2 | Middle | 2 | High | 2 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an understanding and analysis of the complexities of each character and how the tension is created between the characters in the play because of their personal desires.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Each character has a personal agenda and is using the others to achieve their own goals and dreams in life.
THAMI
SMITH
JOHAN
6.6.1
Topics | 10.12: Staging Conventions | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Analysing | |||||
Command verb | Argue | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Examine, study something methodically and in detail to explain and interpret it | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Procedural | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers. Award marks for either arguing for or against
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The play does NOT have gender bias because:
6.6.2
Topics | 10.12: Staging Conventions | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Analysing | |||||
Command verb | Comment | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Write about (a topic) in detail, taking into account or considering different issues or idea or opinions related to it | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Procedural | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which evaluate the differences/ similarities of an all-female cast.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Social-media bias:
6.6.3
Topics | 10.3: South African theatre | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Evaluate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth, or condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding. | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Metacognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response (ECR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 3 | Middle | 4 | High | 3 |
Refer to the notes and the rubric in the annexure to guide your marking.
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which reflect understanding, analysis, evaluation, application and draw conclusions around the subject matter of the question. Acknowledge creativity in this answer. Studying and watching the play:
Characters:
Sense of Belonging and Identity:
QUESTION 7: MISSING BY REZA DE WET
7.1.1
Topics | 12.5: Prescribed Play Text 2: South African Theatre (1960–1994) 12.6: South African Contemporary Theatre (post 1994) | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more details or revealing relevant facts or information about it Give reasons to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 0 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant answers.
The following is a guide:
The date is significant because:
7.1.2
Topics | 12.5: Prescribed Play Text 2: South African Theatre (1960–1994) | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more details or revealing relevant facts or information about it Give reasons to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 0 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant answer.
The following is a guide:
The wind creates a haunting and ominous atmosphere. There are different kinds of wind:
7.1.3
Topics | 12.5: Prescribed Play Text 2: South African Theatre (1960–1994) 12.6: South African Contemporary theatre (post 1994) | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more details or revealing relevant facts or information about it Give reasons to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 1 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answer.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The circus music is significant because:
7.2
Topics | 12.1 20th Century '-isms' | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Applying | |||||
Command verb | Suggest | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Cause, argue, demonstrate, show that (something) exists or is the case Put forward for consideration To mention an idea, possible plan, or action for other people to consider To produce an idea in the mind | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 0 | Middle | 2 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which reflect an understanding of the symbolic significance of the colour of the confirmation dress.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The colour white refers to the fact that Meisie could be seen as:
7.3
Topics | 12.5: Prescribed Play Text 2: South African Theatre (1960–1994) | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Analysing | |||||
Command verb | Analyse | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Examine, study something methodically and in detail, typically in order to discover, explain and interpret it | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which reflect an analysis of how the advertisement creates a mysterious mood.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
A mysterious mood is created by the:
7.4
Topics | 12.5: Prescribed Play Text 2: South African Theatre (1960–1994) 12.6: South African Contemporary theatre (post 1994) 12.7 Performance Text in Context, Theatre Production | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Evaluate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To determine, judge, consider the significant, value, purpose, purpose, worth, or condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Procedural | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response (ECR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an evaluation of how the picture could be suitable or not suitable as an advertisement for the play.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The picture is suitable because:
The picture is not suitable because:
7.5
Topics | 12.5: Prescribed Play Text 2: South African Theatre (1960–1994) | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Describe | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To give, narrate, relate, tell, express a detailed account of | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which reflect an understanding of technical considerations. Candidates may choose any relevant stage.
The following is a guide:
Proscenium arch stage because:
7.6
Topics | 12.5: Prescribed Play Text 2: South African Theatre (1960–1994) | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Motivate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Give a reason, present facts and arguments in support of doing, stating something | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 2 | Middle | 2 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an understanding of how props can be used to highlight the messages of the play.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The following props could be used:
7.7
Topics | 12.5: Prescribed Play Text 2: South African Theatre (1960–1994) | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more details or revealing relevant facts or information about it Give reasons to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 3 | Middle | 3 | High | 0 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an understanding and analysis of the significance of blindness as a motif in the play.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Blindness is a motif because:
7.8
Topics | 10.4: Scene Study. Physical and Vocal Characterisation | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Evaluating | |||||
Command verb | Discuss and evaluate | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth, or condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Metacognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response (ECR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 3 | Middle | 4 | High | 3 |
Refer to the notes and the rubric in the annexure to guide your marking.
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which reflect understanding, analysis, evaluation, application and draw conclusions around the suitability of the play being staged at school.
The following is a guide:
Themes:
Characters:
Genre:
Budget:
Staging:
Relevance:
TOTAL SECTION C: 40
SECTION D: THE HISTORY OF THEATRE, PRACTICAL CONCEPTS, CONTENT AND SKILLS
QUESTION 8
8.1
Topics | 10.12: Staging Conventions | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Remembering | |||||
Command verb | Identify | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To recognise a problem, need, facts etc. and to show what it is and that it exists To prove who or what someone or something is | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 0 |
A: Backdrop/Cyclorama/Scenery
B: Stage/Stage floor (2)
8.2
Topics | 10.12: Staging Conventions | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Give | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Give a reason, present facts and arguments in support of doing, stating something | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Factual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Basic Constructed Response (BCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display the candidates' knowledge of how certain props could have various theatrical uses.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The ladders could be used to symbolise:
8.3
Topics | 10.12: Staging Conventions | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Analysing | |||||
Command verb | Discuss | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Write about (a topic) in detail, taking into account or considering different issues/ideas/opinions related to it | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Procedural | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an understanding and discussion of how the staging in the source reflects any ONE of the 20th century movements '-ism'.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The staging could reflect, e.g. Epic Theatre/Expressionism, because: • It utilises representational props as multifunctional items on stage
8.4
Topics | 11.10 Poor Theatre 12.8 Revision | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Describe | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | To give, narrate, relate, tell, express a detailed account of | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an understanding of Grotowski's staging.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
For the production of Kordian, Grotowski applied his Poor Theatre principles by:
8.5
Topics | 11.10 Poor Theatre | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more details or revealing relevant facts or information about it Give reasons to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Easy | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which demonstrate an understanding of Grotowski's principles of acting.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Grotowski's acting principles:
The Holy Actor:
Via Negativa:
8.6
Topics | 11.10 Poor Theatre | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Analysing | |||||
Command verb | Analyse | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Examine, study something methodically and in detail, typically in order to discover, explain and interpret it | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which display an analysis of how Grotowski's choice of set and stage might create staging challenges.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
Grotowski might have faced challenges such as:
8.7
Topics | 11.10 Poor Theatre | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Understanding | |||||
Command verb | Explain | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more details or revealing relevant facts or information about it Give reasons to justify or excuse (an action or event) | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Conceptual | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Moderate | |||||
Rubric type | Short Constructed Response (SCR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 1 | Middle | 2 | High | 1 |
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers which demonstrate an explanation of how Grotowski's choice of set and stage might have impacted on an audience.
Award full marks for:
The following is a guide:
The staging:
The setting:
QUESTION 9
Topics | 10.4: Scene Study. Physical and Vocal Characterisation | |||||
Cognitive Level of Difficulty | Create | |||||
Command verb | Discuss | |||||
Explanation of Command Verb | Write about (a topic) in detail Consider different issues or ideas or opinions related to it | |||||
Complexity of Thinking Level | Meta Cognitive | |||||
Level of Complexity/ Problem Solving | Difficult | |||||
Rubric type | Extended Constructed Response (ECR) | |||||
Mark allocation | Low | 3 | Middle | 4 | High | 3 |
Refer to the notes and the rubric in the annexure to guide your marking.
Markers accept any relevant and well-motivated answers. This answer should take the form of a personal reflection. Candidates should be awarded marks for reflecting on their own personal involvement with any play text and performances and should refer to dramatic processes, principles and skills.
Play texts:
Perfomances:
Productions:
TOTAL SECTION D: 40
GRAND TOTAL: 150
ANNEXURE A: RUBRIC FOR QUESTIONS: 2, 3, 4, 8: 10 MARKS
DESCRIPTOR | MARK | THE CANDIDATE |
Outstanding Metacognitive Knowledge Create | 9–10 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels:
|
Meritorious Procedural Knowledge Evaluate | 7–8 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels:
|
Average Conceptual Knowledge Analyse | 5–6 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels:
|
Elementary Factual Knowledge Apply | 3–4 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels:
|
Achieved Factual Knowledge Understand | 1–2 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels:
|
Not Achieved Factual Knowledge Remember | 0 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels:
|
ANNEXURE B: RUBRIC FOR QUESTIONS 5, 6, 7: 12 MARKS
DESCRIPTOR | MARK | THE CANDIDATE |
Outstanding Metacognitive Knowledge Create | 11–12 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels:
|
Meritorious Procedural Knowledge Evaluate | 9–10 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels:
|
Average Conceptual Knowledge Analyse | 7–8 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels:
|
Elementary Factual Knowledge Apply | 5–6 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels:
|
Achieved Factual Knowledge Understand | 3–4 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels:
|
Not Achieved Factual Knowledge Remember | 0–2 | Thinking process:
Cognitive levels:
|
ANNEXURE C: BASIC CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE RUBRIC (BCR)
High Score | Score point | The response provides a complete interpretation and/or correct solution. It demonstrates a thorough understanding of the concept or task (contextualise the bold print to the task asked for in the item) It indicates logical reasoning and conclusions. It is accurate, relevant, and complete. |
2 | ||
Average | Score point | The response provides evidence of a partial interpretation and/or solution. The process/explanation is incomplete. It demonstrates an incomplete understanding of the concept (what they must know) or task (what they must do). It contains minor flaws in reasoning, procedures, content. It neglects to address some aspects of the task. |
1 | ||
Not achieved | Score point | The response does not meet the criteria required to earn one point. The response indicates inadequate understanding of the task and/or the idea or concept/skills needed to answer the item (question). It may only repeat information given in the test item. The response may provide an incorrect solution/response and the provided supportive information may be totally irrelevant to the item, or possibly, no other information is shown. The student may have written on a different topic or written, 'I don't know'. |
0 |
SHORT CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE RUBRIC (SCR)
Quality level | Mark allocation | Quality of evidence |
High End | Score point | The response indicates application of a reasonable strategy that leads to a correct solution in the context of the problem. The content is essentially correct. The explanation and/or justification is logically sound, clearly presented, fully developed, supports the solution, and does not contain significant content/skills errors. The response demonstrates a complete understanding and analysis of the problem. |
Average | Score point | The response indicates application of a reasonable strategy that may be incomplete or undeveloped. It may or may not lead to a correct solution. The content is fundamentally correct. The explanation and/or justification supports the solution and is plausible, although it may not be well developed or complete. The response demonstrates a conceptual understanding and analysis of the problem. |
Weak | Score point | The response indicates little or no attempt to apply a reasonable strategy or applies an inappropriate strategy. It may or may not have the correct answer. The content is incomplete or missing. The explanation and/or justification reveals serious flaws in reasoning. The explanation and/or justification may be incomplete or missing. The response demonstrates a minimal understanding and analysis of the problem. |
Not Achieved | Score point | The response is completely incorrect or irrelevant. There may be no response, or the response may state 'I don't know'. |
EXTENDED CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE RUBRIC (ECR)
Quality Level | Mark allocation | Quality of evidence |
High End | Score point | The response indicates application of a reasonable strategy that leads to a correct solution in the context of the problem. The procedural representations are correct. The explanation and/or justification is logically sound, clearly presented, fully developed, supports the solution, and does not contain significant conceptual errors. The response demonstrates a complete understanding and analysis of the problem. |
Average and Above Average | Score point | The response indicates application of a reasonable strategy that may or may not lead to a correct solution. The use of content/skill is essentially correct. The explanation and/or justification is generally well developed, feasible, and supports the solution. The response demonstrates a clear understanding and analysis of the problem. |
Achieved | Score point | The response indicates an incomplete application of a reasonable strategy that may or may not lead to a fit-for-purpose solution. The use of content/skill is fundamentally correct. The explanation and/or justification support the solution and is plausible, although it may not be well developed or complete. The response demonstrates a conceptual understanding and analysis of the problem. |
Weak | Score point | The response indicates little or no application of a reasonable strategy. It may or may not have the correct answer. The use of content/skill is incomplete or missing. The explanation and/or justification reveal serious flaws in reasoning. The explanation and/or justification may be incomplete or missing. The response demonstrates a minimal understanding and analysis of the problem. |
Not Achieved | Score point | The response is completely incorrect or irrelevant. There may be no response, or the response may state 'I don't know.' |
Recall and Reproduction | Skills and Concepts | Strategic Thinking and Reasoning | Extended Thinking/ Complex Reasoning |
✔ Easy | Moderate Challenging | Difficult | Very difficult |
ANNEXURE D
BLOOMS' TAXONOMY
Classification system to define and distinguish different levels of human cognition |
THE KNOWLEDGE DIMENSION 4 LEVELS OF THINKING PROCESSES | THE COGNITIVE PROCESS DIMENSION: 6 COGNITIVE LEVELS | ||||||
Remembering | Understanding | Applying | Analysing | Evaluating | Creating | ||
Factual | List | Summarise | Respond | Select | Check for | Generate | |
Conceptual | Recognise | Classify | Provide | Differentiate | Determine | Assemble | |
Procedural | Recall | Clarify | Carry out | Integrate | Judge | Design | |
Meta cognitive | Identify | Predict | Use | Deconstruct | Reflect | Create |
1. Remembering | |
Retrieving memorised information, knowledge, facts, definitions, lists, conventions, trends, sequences, classifications, categories, criteria, methodology and ways and means of dealing with specifics of the universals, abstractions principles, generalisations, theories and structure | |
Name | Specify (time, or place) as something desired, suggested, or decided on |
Identify | To recognise a problem, need, fact, etc. and to show what it is and that it exists |
Select | Carefully choose, determine or decide as being the best or most suitable |
2. Understanding | |
Construct meaning from different types of knowledge, organise, compare, translate, interpret and extrapolate | |
Explain | Make something clear, easy to understand by describing it in more detail or revealing relevant facts or information about it give a reason so as to justify or excuse (an action or event) |
Describe | To give, narrate, relate, tell, describe, express a detailed account of |
Motivate | Give a reason, present facts and arguments in support of doing, stating something |
3. Applying | |
Carry out, execute, implement or use a procedure to solve or develop a problem in a new situation by applying acquired knowledge, facts rules, methods, techniques and rules | |
Suggest | Cause, argue, demonstrate, show that (something) exists or is the case |
4. Analysing | |
Break information into parts. Determine how the parts relate, by identifying, differentiating or organising elements, relationships, principles, motives, purpose or cause. Make inferences/conclusions and find evidence to support generalisations. | |
Respond | Reply react or answer in words |
Discuss | Write about (a topic) in detail, taking into account or considering different issues or idea or opinions related to it |
Write | Compose, write, produce |
Analyse | Examine, study something methodically and in detail, typically in order to discover, explain and interpret it |
Consider | Think carefully about something, typically before making a decision, judgment, choice. |
5. Evaluating | |
Present and defend opinions by making judgments about information, validity of ideas, or quality of work based on a set of criteria and standards through checking and critiquing | |
Evaluate | To determine, judge, consider the significance, value, purpose, worth, or condition of something by careful appraisal and study for the purpose of understanding, interpreting or guiding. |
6. Creating | |
Use of creative individual insight and thoughts to reorganising and compile information through generating, planning and creating a new pattern, product or structure | |
Create | Evolve from one's own thought or imagination, as a work of art, an invention or something new Cause to come into being. |