ENGLISH FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE
PAPER 1
GRADE 12
NSC PAST PAPERS AND MEMOS
FEBRUARY/MARCH 2018
INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION
This memorandum must be used together with the attached English FAL assessment rubrics for SECTIONS A, B and C.
MEMORANDUM
SECTION A: ESSAY
QUESTION 1
Instructions to Markers:
- Candidates are required to write on ONE topic only.
- The ideas listed below the topics are only some ways in which the topic could be interpreted.
- Full credit must be given for the candidate's own interpretation.
- Marking must be objective. Give credit for relevant ideas.
- Use the 50-mark assessment rubric to mark the essays. The texts produced by candidates must be assessed according to the following criteria as set out in the assessment rubric:
- Content and planning (30 marks)
- Language, style and editing (15 marks)
- Structure (5 marks)
NOTE: - Adhere to the length of 250–300 words as prescribed in the CAPS document. However, should the maximum word count be reached mid- sentence, read to the end of that sentence.
- No additional penalties may be imposed as the rubric itself imposes penalties.
1.1 An escape
Narrative/Reflective/Descriptive
- If narrative, the essay must have a strong story line and an interesting ending. The essay is usually written in the past tense.
- If reflective, the essay should convey emotional reactions and feelings the candidate experiences/experienced.
- If descriptive, the candidate should create a picture in words, using as many senses as possible to make the description clear.
NOTE: A candidate may write an essay which contains elements of more than one type of essay. [50]
1.2 We have been friends since Grade 1
Narrative/Reflective/Descriptive
- If narrative, the essay must have a strong story line and an interesting ending. This topic lends itself to the possibility of being written in both the past tense and the present tense.
- If reflective, the essay should convey emotional reactions and feelings the candidate experiences/experienced.
- If descriptive, the candidate should create a picture in words, using as many senses as possible to make the description clear.
NOTE: A candidate may write an essay which contains elements of more than one type of essay. [50]
1.3 The home in which I grew up
Descriptive/Reflective/Narrative
- If descriptive, the candidate should create a picture in words, using as many senses as possible to make the description clear.
- If reflective, the essay should convey emotional reactions and feelings the candidate experiences/experienced.
- If narrative, the essay must have a strong story line and an interesting ending. The essay is usually written in the past tense.
NOTE: A candidate may write an essay which contains elements of more than one type of essay. [50]
1.4 'Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated.' – Confucius Discuss this statement.
Discursive/Narrative/Reflective/Descriptive/Argumentative
- If discursive, the arguments for and against must be well-balanced and clearly analysed in the essay. Supporting evidence must be provided for arguments given. The candidate may come to a particular conclusion at the end of the essay which should include recommendations.
- If narrative, the essay must have a strong story line and an interesting ending.
- If reflective, the essay should convey emotional reactions and feelings the candidate experiences/experienced.
- If descriptive, the writer should create a picture in words, using as many senses as possible to make the description clear.
- If argumentative, the essay must reflect a specific argument or viewpoint for or against the topic. The candidate should give a range of arguments to support and substantiate his/her view. The conclusion should be a strong, clear and convincing statement of the writer's opinion.
NOTE: A candidate may write an essay which contains elements of more than one type of essay. [50]
1.5 We are responsible for what future generations will inherit from us Argumentative/Reflective/Discursive
- If argumentative, the essay must reflect a specific argument or viewpoint for or against the topic. The candidate should give a range of arguments to support and substantiate his/her view. The conclusion should be a strong, clear and convincing statement of the writer's opinion.
- If reflective, the essay should convey emotional reactions and feelings the candidate experiences/experienced.
- If discursive, the arguments for and against must be well-balanced and clearly analysed in the essay. Supporting evidence must be provided for arguments given. The candidate may come to a particular conclusion at the end of the essay which should include recommendations.
NOTE: A candidate may write an essay which contains elements of more than one type of essay. [50]
1.6 Freedom of speech is both a right and a responsibility. Do you agree? Argumentative
- The essay must reflect a specific argument or viewpoint for or against the topic.
- The candidate should give a range of arguments to support and substantiate his/her view.
- The conclusion should be a strong, clear and convincing statement of the writer's opinion.
- If discursive, the arguments for and against must be well-balanced and clearly analysed in the essay. Supporting evidence must be provided for arguments given. The candidate may come to a particular conclusion at the end of the essay which should include recommendations. [50]
1.7 Interpretation of pictures
Narrative/Descriptive/Reflective/Argumentative/Discursive
- The candidate should give the essay a suitable title.
- The candidate may interpret the pictures in any way.
- The candidate may choose to write any type of essay.
- The interpretation must be linked to the picture.
- The candidate may write in any appropriate tense.
1.7.1 Picture: Tap
- Literal interpretations: the importance of water in our lives, lack of service delivery, access to water.
- Figurative interpretations: drought, water conservation.
1.7.2 Picture: An athlete
- Literal interpretations: sport, talents, competition.
- Figurative interpretations: rat-race, competing to be the best, taking up challenges. [50]
TOTAL SECTION A: 50
SECTION B: LONGER TRANSACTIONAL TEXT
QUESTION 2
Instructions to Markers:
- Candidates are required to answer ONE question.
- Marking must be objective. Give credit for relevant ideas.
- Use the 30-mark assessment rubric to mark the responses in this section. The texts produced by candidates must be assessed according to the following criteria as set out in the assessment rubric:
- Content, planning and format (18 marks)
- Language, style and editing (12 marks)
NOTE: - Adhere to the length of 120–150 words as prescribed in the CAPS document. However, should the maximum word count be reached mid sentence, read to the end of that sentence.
- No additional penalties may be imposed as the rubric itself imposes penalties.
2.1 FRIENDLY LETTER
A letter of congratulations
- The letter should have an introduction, a body and a conclusion.
- The tone and register of the letter should be friendly and informal.
- The following aspects of format must be included:
- Address of sender
- Date
- Greeting/Salutation
- Suitable ending
- The candidate must express his/her congratulations to the friend. [30]
2.2 LETTER OF APPLICATION
Application for the position of general assistant
- Acceptable variations of format must be allowed.
- The letter should be addressed to the production manager.
- The tone and register of the letter should be formal.
- The letter should have an introduction, a body and conclusion.
- The following aspects of format must be included:
- Address of sender
- Date
- Recipient: The Production Manager
- Name of the production company
- Address of recipient
- Greeting/Salutation
- Subject line
- Suitable ending
- Signature
- Name of sender
- The purpose of the letter must be clear. [30]
2.3 INFORMAL REPORT
A report on a project
- The report must have:
- A topic
- A recipient
- A sender
- The report must be written using an informal format but formal language. [30]
- Slang or colloquial language is NOT acceptable.
- Information about the project must be included.
2.4 INTERVIEW
Interview with a private nurse
- A context must be provided at the beginning of the interview.
- The dialogue must be between yourself and the nurse.
- The tone and register should be appropriate to the person being interviewed.
- The questions must be probing and to the point.
- The names of the speakers should be followed by colons.
- A new line should be used to indicate each new speaker. [30]
TOTAL SECTION B: 30
SECTION C: SHORTER TRANSACTIONAL TEXT
QUESTION 3
Instructions to Markers:
- Candidates are required to answer ONE question.
- Marking must be objective. Give credit for relevant ideas.
- Use the 20-mark assessment rubric to mark the responses in this section. The texts produced by candidates must be assessed according to the following criteria as set out in the attached rubric:
- Content, planning and format (12 marks)
- Language, style and editing (8 marks)
NOTE: - Adhere to the length of 80–100 words as prescribed in the CAPS document. However, should the maximum word count be reached mid- sentence, read to the end of that sentence.
- No additional penalties may be imposed as the rubric itself imposes penalties.
3.1 INVITATION CARD
Invitation to a farewell dinner
- The invitation must include the following aspects:
- Date, venue and time
- Type of function
- Language should be suited to the context.
- Full sentences are not necessary.
- No marks should be awarded for illustrations. [20]
3.2 DIARY ENTRIES
The candidate's feelings before and after his/her first day at work.
- There MUST be TWO diary entries with two different dates/times.
- The diary entries should be written in the first person.
- The language should be simple and informal.
- The tone must reflect suitable emotions. [20]
3.3 DIRECTIONS
Directions from the shopping centre to the local post office
- The directions may be in point or paragraph form.
- Complete sentences are not necessary.
- Directions must be in the correct sequence, including reference to distance, turns and landmarks.
- No marks are awarded for sketches or maps. [20]
TOTAL SECTION C: 20
GRAND TOTAL: 100
ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR ESSAY – FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE [50 MARKS]
Criteria | | Exceptional | Skilful | Moderate | Elementary | Inadequate |
CONTENT & PLANNING (Response and ideas) Organisation of ideas for planning; Awareness of purpose, audience and context 30 MARKS | Upper level | 28–30 | 22–24 | 16–18 | 10–12 | 4–6 |
- Outstanding/Striking response beyond normal expectations
- Intelligent, thought-provoking and mature ideas
- Exceptionally well organised and coherent, including introduction, body and conclusion
| - Very well-crafted response
- Fully relevant and interesting ideas with evidence of maturity
- Very well organised and coherent, including
introduction, body and conclusion | - Satisfactory response -Ideas are reasonably coherent and convincing
- Reasonably organised and coherent, including introduction, body and conclusion
| - Inconsistently coherent response
- Unclear ideas and unoriginal
- Little evidence of organisation and coherence
| - Totally irrelevant response
- Confused and unfocused ideas
- Vague and repetitive
- Unorganised and incoherent
|
Lower level | 25–27 | 19–21 | 13–15 | 7–9 | 0–3 |
- Excellent response but lacks the exceptionally striking qualities of the outstanding essay
- Mature and intelligent ideas
- Skilfully organised and coherent, including introduction, body and conclusion
| - Well-crafted response
- Relevant and interesting ideas
- Well organised and coherent, including
introduction, body and conclusion | - Satisfactory response but some lapses in clarity
- Ideas are fairly coherent and convincing
- Some degree of organisation and coherence, including introduction, body and conclusion
| - Largely irrelevant response
- Ideas tend to be disconnected and confusing
- Hardly any evidence of organisation and coherence
| - No attempt to respond to the topicCompletely irrelevant and inappropriate
- Unfocused and muddled
|
LANGUAGE, STYLE & EDITING Tone, register, style, vocabulary appropriate to purpose/effect and context; Word choice; Language use and conventions, punctuation, grammar, spelling 15 MARKS | Upper level | 14–15 | 11–12 | 8–9 | 5–6 | 0-3 |
- Tone, register, style and vocabulary highly appropriate to purpose, audience and context
- Exceptionally impressive use of language,
- Compelling and rhetorically effective in tone
- Virtually error-free in grammar and spelling
- Very skilfully crafted
| - Tone, register, style and vocabulary very appropriate to purpose, audience and context
- Language is effective and a consistently appropriate tone is used
- Largely error-free in grammar and spelling
- Very well crafted
| - Tone, register, style and vocabulary appropriate to purpose, audience and context
- Appropriate use of language to convey meaning
- Rhetorical devices used to enhance content
| - Tone, register, style and vocabulary less appropriate to purpose, audience and context
- Very basic use of language
- Diction is inappropriate
- Very limited vocabulary
| - Language incomprehensible
- Tone, register, style and vocabulary not appropriate to purpose, audience and context
- Vocabulary limitations so extreme as to make comprehension impossible
|
Lower level | 13 | 10 | 7 | 4 | |
- Language excellent and rhetorically effective in tone
- Virtually error-free in grammar and spelling
- Skilfully crafted
| - Language engaging and generally effective
- Appropriate and effective tone
- Few errors in grammar and spelling
- Well-crafted
| - Adequate use of language with some inconsistencies
- Tone generally appropriate and limited use of rhetorical devices
| - Inadequate use of language
- Little or no variety in sentences
- Exceptionally limited vocabulary
| |
STRUCTURE Features of text; Paragraph development and sentence construction 5 MARKS | | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0-1 |
- Excellent development of topic
- Exceptional detail
- Sentences, paragraphs exceptionally well-constructed
| - Logical development of details
- Coherent
- Sentences, paragraphs logical, varied
| - Relevant details developed
- Sentences, paragraphs well-constructed
- Essay still makes sense
| - Some valid points
- Sentences and paragraphs faulty
- Essay still makes some sense
| - Necessary point lacking
- Sentences an paragraphs faulty
|
ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR LONGER TRANSACTIONAL TEXT – FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE [30 MARKS]
Criteria | Exceptional | Skilful | Moderate | Elementary | Inadequate |
CONTENT, PLANNING & FORMAT Response and ideas; Organisation of ideas for planning; Purpose, audience, features/conventions and context 18MARKS | 15-18 | 11-14 | 8-10 | 5-7 | 0-4 |
- Outstanding response beyond normal expectations
- Intelligent and mature ideas
- xtensive knowledge of features of the type of text
- Writing maintains focus
- Coherence in content and ideas
- Highly elaborated and all details support the topic
- Appropriate and accurate format
| - Very good response demonstrating good knowledge of features of the type of text
- Maintains focus – no digressions
- Coherent in content and ideas, very well elaborated and details support topic
- Appropriate format with minor inaccuracies
| - Adequate response demonstrating knowledge of features of the type of text
- Not completely focused – some digressions
- Reasonably coherent in content and ideas
- Some details support the topic
- Generally appropriate format but with some inaccuracies
| - Basic response demonstrating some knowledge of features of the type of text
- Some focus but writing digresses
- Not always coherent in content and ideas Few details support the topic
- Has vaguely applied necessary rules of format
- Some critical oversights
| - Response reveals no knowledge of features of the type of text
- Meaning is obscure with major digressions
- Not coherent in content and ideas
- Very few details support the topic
- Has not applied necessary rules of format
|
LANGUAGE, STYLE & EDITING Tone, register, style, purpose/effect, audience and context; Language use and conventions; Word choice; Punctuation and spelling 12 MARKS | 10-12 | 8-9 | 6-7 | 4-5 | 0–3 |
- Tone, register, style and vocabulary highly appropriate to purpose, audience and context
- Grammatically accurate and well-constructed
- Virtually error-free
| - Tone, register, style and vocabulary very appropriate to purpose, audience and context
- Generally grammatically accurate and well-constructed
- Very good vocabulary
- Mostly free of errors
| - Tone, register, style and vocabulary appropriate to purpose, audience and context
- Some grammatical errors
- Adequate vocabulary
- Errors do not impede meaning
| - Tone, register, style and vocabulary less appropriate to purpose, audience and context
- Inaccurate grammar with numerous errors
- Limited vocabulary
- Meaning obscured
| - Tone, register, style and vocabulary do not correspond to purpose, audience and context
- Error-ridden and confused
- Vocabulary not suitable for purpose
- Meaning seriously impaired
|
MARK RANGE | 25-30 | 19-23 | 14-17 | 9-12 | 0-7 |
ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR SHORTER TRANSACTIONAL TEXT – FIRST ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE [20 MARKS]
Criteria | Exceptional | Skilful | Moderate | Elementary | Inadequate |
CONTENT, PLANNING & FORMAT Response and ideas; Organisation of ideas for planning; Purpose, audience, features/conventions and context 12MARKS | 10-12 | 8-9 | 6-7 | 4-5 | 0-3 |
- Outstanding response beyond normal expectations
- Intelligent and mature ideas
- xtensive knowledge of features of the type of text
- Writing maintains focus
- Coherence in content and ideas
- Highly elaborated and all details support the topic
- Appropriate and accurate format
| - Very good response demonstrating good knowledge of features of the type of text
- Maintains focus – no digressions
- Coherent in content and ideas, very well elaborated and details support topic
- Appropriate format with minor inaccuracies
| - Adequate response demonstrating knowledge of features of the type of text
- Not completely focused – some digressions
- Reasonably coherent in content and ideas
- Some details support the topic
- Generally appropriate format but with some inaccuracies
| - Basic response demonstrating some knowledge of features of the type of text
- Some focus but writing digresses
- Not always coherent in content and ideas Few details support the topic
- Has vaguely applied necessary rules of format
- Some critical oversights
| - Response reveals no knowledge of features of the type of text
- Meaning is obscure with major digressions
- Not coherent in content and ideas
- Very few details support the topic
- Has not applied necessary rules of format
|
LANGUAGE, STYLE & EDITING Tone, register, style, purpose/effect, audience and context; Language use and conventions; Word choice; Punctuation and spelling 8 MARKS | 7-8 | 5-6 | 4 | 3 | 0–2 |
- Tone, register, style and vocabulary highly appropriate to purpose, audience and context
- Grammatically accurate and well-constructed
- Virtually error-free
| - Tone, register, style and vocabulary very appropriate to purpose, audience and context
- Generally grammatically accurate and well-constructed
- Very good vocabulary
- Mostly free of errors
| - Tone, register, style and vocabulary appropriate to purpose, audience and context
- Some grammatical errors
- Adequate vocabulary
- Errors do not impede meaning
| - Tone, register, style and vocabulary less appropriate to purpose, audience and context
- Inaccurate grammar with numerous errors
- Limited vocabulary
- Meaning obscured
| - Tone, register, style and vocabulary do not correspond to purpose, audience and context
- Error-ridden and confused
- Vocabulary not suitable for purpose
- Meaning seriously impaired
|
MARK RANGE | 17-20 | 13-15 | 10-11 | 7-8 | 0-5 |