BUSINESS STUDIES
GRADE: 12
TERM: 1
ASSESSMENT TASK:CASE STUDY
YEAR:2022
BUSINESS STUDIES GRADE 12 PROGRAMME OF ASSESSMENT
TERM | TASK | FORM OF ASSESSMENT | CONTENT | WEIGHTING | DATE |
1 | 1 | Case Study | At least 4 topics as per the ATP in Term 1 | 15 | MARCH 2022 |
2 | Controlled Test | Control test should cover all term 1 topics as per the ATP for Term 1 | 20 | MACH 2022 | |
2 | 3 | Presentation | At least 4 topics as per the ATP of Term 2 | 15 | June 2022 |
3 | 4 | Project | Term 3 topics as per the ATP | 20 | September 2022 |
5 | Prelim Exam | P1: Business Environments & Business Operations P2: Business Ventures & Business Roles | 30 | September 2022 | |
4 | 6 | Final Examination | P1: Business Environments & Business Operations P2: Business Ventures & Business Roles | 75 | October/November 2022 |
Terms of references for a case study and controlled test
CASE STUDY
CONTROLLED TEST
The control test must adhere to the following:
ANNEXURE A
BUSINESS STUDIES
CONSOLIDATION SCHEDULE
NAME OF LEARNER : ___________________________________
EXAMINATION NUMBER : ________________________________
NAME OF SCHOOL : ________________________________
TASKS | TOTAL | MARKS OBTAINED | INTERNAL MODERATION | EXTERNAL MODERATION |
Case Study | 50 | |||
Controlled Test | 100 | |||
Presentation | 50 | |||
Project | 50 | |||
Preparatory exam | 300 | |||
FINAL SBA MARK (550/5,5) | 100 |
We hereby certify that these marks are a true reflection of the above learner’s work | ||
Signature | Date | |
Learner | ||
Educator | ||
Principal / HOD |
ANNEXURE B
DECLARATION BY LEARNER
SCHOOL NAME : ___________________________________
NAME OF LEARNER : ___________________________________
TEACHER’S NAME : ___________________________________
I hereby declare that all SBA tasks contained in this portfolio are my original work and that if I have used any sources, I have acknowledged them.
I will endeavour to keep my work original and not plagiarise other sources/people’s work. I agree that if it is determined by the relevant authorities that I have engaged in any fraudulent activities whatsoever about my SBA mark, I shall forfeit completely for this assessment (s)
_________________________ ______________
CANDIDATE’S SIGNATURE DATE
________________________ ______________
PARENT/ GUARDIAN DATE
As far as I know, the above statement by the candidate is true and I accept that the work offered is his/her name
_________________________ ______________
TEACHER’S SIGNATURE DATE
SCHOOL STAMP |
ANNEXURE C
EVIDENCE OF SCHOOL & DISTRICT MODERATION
DISTRICT | |
SUBJECT | |
GRADE | |
NAME OF SCHOOL | |
NAME OF EDUCATOR (S) | |
NAME OF HOD | |
DATE | |
10% of portfolios have to be moderated for school-based moderation |
QUALITY / STANDARD OF ASSESSMENT TASK | YES | NO | COMMENTS |
MODERATION TOOL | |||
Does the task correspond with the programme of assessment? | |||
Is the case study/controlled test/June/Prelim exams CAPS compliant? | |||
Is there evidence that the HOD/ Senior Teacher moderated the task? | |||
Does the task reflect the content coverage for the term and the grade as per abridged CAPS chapter 4? | |||
Is the duration of the task indicated and in accordance with the abridged CAPS chapter 4? | |||
Are the instructions clear? | |||
Is the mark allocation/ weighting for the task per CAPS section 4? | |||
Does the task incorporate the different cognitive levels (Blooms’ Taxonomy)? | |||
Does the task reflect the use of a variety of data response questions? (Scenarios/Case studies/indirect statements?) | |||
ASSESSMENT TOOLS | |||
Are the assessment tools e.g. rubric, memoranda, checklists, etc. for every assessment task included in the educator’s portfolio file? | |||
Is a correct assessment tool used as indicated in the CAPS document and SBA guideline? | |||
Is a tool consistently applied during the assessment of the task? | |||
MARKING | |||
Are the tasks dated? By the marker and moderator(s) | |||
Is marking done according to assessment tools? | |||
Are the marks correctly added and recorded? | |||
RECORDS | |||
Is the subject working mark sheet /record sheets included in the teacher’s file? | |||
Are the working mark sheets /record sheets in accordance with the CAPS? | |||
Are the learners’ marks corresponding with the working mark sheet/ record sheets? | |||
Are the marks correctly converted according to the weighting as reflected in the CAPS document? | |||
Number of tasks completed | No. | Specify Case Study and control test | |
NAMES OF LEARNERS WHOSE PORTFOLIOS WERE MODERATED | MARK ALLOCATED BY
| MARK ALLOCATED BY
| |
AREAS OF GOOD PRACTICE |
|
CHALLENGES |
|
RECOMMENDATIONS/FOLLOW-UP |
|
HOD/ MODERATOR SIGNATURE DATE
TEACHER SIGNATURE DATE
CLUSTER MODERATOR SIGNATURE DATE
SCHOOL STAMP |
ANNEXURE C
EVIDENCE OF SCHOOL MODERATION GRADE 10-12
DISTRICT | |
SUBJECT | |
GRADE | |
NAME OF SCHOOL | |
NAME OF EDUCATOR (S) | |
NAME OF HOD | |
DATE | |
10% of portfolios have to be moderated for school-based moderation |
QUALITY / STANDARD OF ASSESSMENT TASK | YES | NO | COMMENTS |
MODERATION TOOL | |||
Does the task correspond with the programme of assessment? | |||
Is the case study/controlled test/June/Prelim exams CAPS compliant? | |||
Is there evidence that the HOD/ Senior Teacher moderated the task? | |||
Does the task reflect the content coverage for the term and the grade as per abridged CAPS chapter 4? | |||
Is the duration of the task indicated and in accordance with the abridged CAPS chapter 4? | |||
Are the instructions clear? | |||
Is the mark allocation/ weighting for the task per CAPS section 4? | |||
Does the task incorporate the different cognitive levels (Blooms’ Taxonomy)? | |||
Does the task reflect the use of a variety of data response questions? (Scenarios/Case studies/indirect statements?) | |||
ASSESSMENT TOOLS | |||
Are the assessment tools e.g. rubric, memoranda, checklists, etc. for every assessment task included in the educator’s portfolio file? | |||
Is a correct assessment tool used as indicated in the CAPS document and SBA guideline? | |||
Is a tool consistently applied during the assessment of the task? | |||
MARKING | |||
Are the tasks dated? By the marker and moderator(s) | |||
Is marking done according to assessment tools? | |||
Are the marks correctly added and recorded? | |||
RECORDS | |||
Is the subject working mark sheet /record sheets included in the teacher’s file? | |||
Are the working mark sheets /record sheets in accordance with the CAPS? | |||
Are the learners’ marks corresponding with the working mark sheet/ record sheets? | |||
Are the marks correctly converted according to the weighting as reflected in the CAPS document? | |||
Number of tasks completed | No. | Specify Case Study and control test | |
NAMES OF LEARNERS WHOSE PORTFOLIOS WERE MODERATED | MARK ALLOCATED BY
| MARK ALLOCATED BY
| |
AREAS OF GOOD PRACTICE |
|
CHALLENGES |
|
RECOMMENDATIONS/FOLLOW-UP |
|
HOD/ MODERATOR SIGNATURE DATE
TEACHER SIGNATURE DATE
CLUSTER MODERATOR SIGNATURE DATE
SCHOOL STAMP |
BUSINESS STUDIES 2022 Grade: 12 Term: 1 Assessment Task: Case Study Marks: 50 Issue Date: __________________ Submission Date: ________________ Surname of Learner: __________________________________________ Name of Learner : ____________________________________________ MAIN TOPICS COVERED | |
FINAL MARK | 50 |
TERM 1 : Case Study
DURATION : 2 Hours
TOTAL : 50 Marks
NB: This task should be completed under controlled conditions
QUESTION 1
1.1 Read the case study below and answer the questions that follow:
TUMI MANUFACTURERS LIMITED (TM) Tumi manufacturers is a large business that specialises in manufacturing plastic Bottles it has more TM has a vacancy for a financial manager. Nadine, the human resource manager conducted job TM has placed an advertisement on the office notice board that contains fringe benefits that the TM boards of directors complained to the top management that the business dealings are not transparent Management of TM designed a questionnaire consisting of questions on how to improve the quality of |
1.1.1 Identify TWO Acts that Tumi Manufacturers complies with. Motivate your answer by quoting from the case study above.
Use the table below as a GUIDE to answer QUESTION 1.1.1
ACTS | MOTIVATIONS |
1. | |
2. |
(6)
1.1.2 Explain the purposes of the Acts identified in QUESTION 1.1.1 (4)
1.1.3 Identify the recruitment method used by TM to attract suitable candidates for the vacancy.
Motivate your answer by quoting from the case study above.
Use the table as a GUIDE to answer QUESTION 1.1.3
RECRUITMENT METHOD | MOTIVATION |
1. |
(3)
1.1.4 Discuss the positive impact of the recruitment method identified in QUESTION 1.1.3 (6)
1.1.5 Differentiate between the TWO components of job analysis. (6)
1.1.6 Advise TM on how can apply the following King Code principle for good corporate governance.
1.1.7 Identify the type of unethical business practices from the case study above. Motivate your answer by quoting from the case study above.
Use the table below as a GUIDE to answer QUESTION 1.1.7
TYPE OF UNETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICE | MOTIVATION |
(3)
1.1.8 Explain how the unethical business practice identified in QUESTION 1.1.7 pose a challenge to TM as a business. (6)
1.1.9 Quote TWO ways in which TM applies the Delphi technique and Force Field analysis problem-solving techniques to solve complex business problems
Use the table below as a GUIDE to answer QUESTION 1.1.8
PROBLEM-SOLVING TECHNIQUE | APPLICATION |
Delphi technique | 1. 2. |
Force Field analysis | 1. 2. |
(4)
1.1.10 Advised TM on other ways in which they can apply the TWO problem solving techniques mentioned in QUESTION 1.1.9 (4)
TOTAL: [50]